Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Vintage vs. Modern performance:
Vintage cars had the edge on performance 4 5.33%
Modern cars have the edge on performance 61 81.33%
Neither is inherently better than the other 10 13.33%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2012, 04:30 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat Gambler View Post
Just think...these two cars were/are turn key cars and are nothing special. Bought and driven...wreck today...search and be into a new one tomorrow.
About that "drag racing" with a classic with hard to get or next to impossible parts to find or get.
You could go to your grave and not find another. Something that always is on ANY classic car owners mind. Your first mistake could be your Last!



Two Turkeys on Thanksgiving Wrecking their Corvettes in The Woodlands - YouTube
I guess when you own a car like everyone elses...you always have to prove something with it.

"WE" just need to pull out of the garage...maybe take it out less than a block before people start eyeballing it.





The Doors - L.A. Woman Official Video HQ - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2012, 04:38 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by lgt View Post
What in the world are you talking about, your collectables?
A car that is almost 50 years old and still on the road...A two owner car....guess who #2 is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 05:37 PM
 
Location: South Jersey
7,780 posts, read 21,869,902 times
Reputation: 2355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat Gambler View Post
For 402 HP @ 6,500 RPM on regular fuel...and 420 HP @ 6,500 RPM on premium fuel at the flywheel that's odd.

they are underated from the factory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 06:12 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
they are underated from the factory.
I think many "hot rods" are in general. Can you believe a '90 GT 5.0 was only rated for 225 HP? They will smoke the tires almost non stop through 1st and 2nd and still leave "most"....er many newer cars in the dust with a 5 speed car... With an automatic...not so much. I knew a guy that had a '87. It had the 85 MPH speedo in it. LOL You could almost bury it in second gear...third for sure. That was a joke....then they switched to 140 MPH speedos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 06:27 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat Gambler View Post



Same with this '66. I do prefer the '65 much better though. I'm not crazy about the quarter windows in the '66. I like the vent louvers on the '65 much better as well as other '65 only features...gauge pod is another one. Did you guys watch this? It reminds me of the first day I drove off in my '65 after buying it. I should have trailered it home. I didn't...I took a buddy with me in my pick up at the time to follow me home and drive my truck approx 40 miles. The first time I shifted into 1st gear and let out the clutch and stepped on it...it looked and felt just like this. I think I almost s*** myself.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 06:37 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629
Notice that part about :36 seconds in where the engine is revving and he's not moving very fast. I 100% am sure smoke is rolling out of the wheel wells. The part after he turns around where the steering wheel whipping back and forth. A novice would think it doesn't handle. Listen to that engine and think again...try harder. The fricking back end is fishtailing all over the place and rolling smoke again. Supprize nobody called the Cops in that yuppie neighborhood too!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 07:57 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,851,256 times
Reputation: 12949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat Gambler View Post
Same with this '66. I do prefer the '65 much better though. I'm not crazy about the quarter windows in the '66. I like the vent louvers on the '65 much better as well as other '65 only features...gauge pod is another one. Did you guys watch this? It reminds me of the first day I drove off in my '65 after buying it. I should have trailered it home. I didn't...I took a buddy with me in my pick up at the time to follow me home and drive my truck approx 40 miles. The first time I shifted into 1st gear and let out the clutch and stepped on it...it looked and felt just like this. I think I almost s*** myself.


That looks almost as fast as my Honda...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 09:03 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by 415_s2k View Post
That looks almost as fast as my Honda...
Haha...does your Honda scream like that?

Jesus...did you see the back seatbelt fly up when he tore off? LMAO Crazy shister!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 10:04 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,851,256 times
Reputation: 12949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat Gambler View Post
Haha...does your Honda scream like that?
Actually, yeah, it does... little bit harder, actually: 9k RPM with a peak torque in the mid 8's is nothing to balk at!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 10:20 PM
 
2,528 posts, read 2,815,572 times
Reputation: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by 415_s2k View Post
Actually, yeah, it does... little bit harder, actually: 9k RPM with a peak torque in the mid 8's is nothing to balk at!
You'd love a Boss 302 then. Both the 289 K-code and the Boss 302 are/were solid lifter cam shafts. 6,000...7,000...8,000 and even a bit more (back in the day) on a race track with Parnelli Jones in Trans Am. Most don't beat them up that hard anymore. The blocks are getting harder and harder to find. Someone earlier asked me about a solid lifter cam and why I used one again. Well...when the valves and lifters start floating on a hydraulic flat tappet at around 5,000- 5,500.....you'll know why. Anyone who knows anything about Ford engines knows the 289 was a much harder revver than it's '68 302 replacement in standard form. Same thing with a 327 Chevy VS 350. That 327 is a fire breathing monster. Even more rare was the 302 they made. I think only one or a few years. You don't want to blow one of those bad boys up. They are very very rare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top