Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2013, 07:10 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,510 posts, read 33,305,373 times
Reputation: 7622

Advertisements

I was looking through my magazine collection and found the May, 1989 issue interesting.

In that issue, is a chart showing the fastest 0-60 mph and 1/4 mile times for each year of the cars tested by M/T.

I happened to notice that the $3,000 '68 Dodge Dart 340 had faster acceleration than the $6,000+ '72 Porsche 911S and the $25,000+ 1974 Maserati Bora.

Anyway, informative to compare the figures...



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2013, 07:11 PM
 
2,349 posts, read 5,435,099 times
Reputation: 3062
Cool. I love old data stuff like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Seoul
11,554 posts, read 9,324,204 times
Reputation: 4660
Interesting that 0-60 times in the 1960's were lower than the 0-60 times in the 1970's. Wonder why
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
2,990 posts, read 8,711,373 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warszawa View Post
Interesting that 0-60 times in the 1960's were lower than the 0-60 times in the 1970's. Wonder why
70's were the smog/gas shortage years. Engines performance drastically down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,166,939 times
Reputation: 29983
I can't believe how quick some of those 70s/80s NA 911s were considering the modest (by today's standards) power output. Then again they probably weighed a thousand pounds less than a contemporary Carrera. The turbo versions were hardly worth the bother.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 08:52 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,510 posts, read 33,305,373 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
I can't believe how quick some of those 70s/80s NA 911s were considering the modest (by today's standards) power output. Then again they probably weighed a thousand pounds less than a contemporary Carrera. The turbo versions were hardly worth the bother.
Yes, they were probably very light. Probably something like 2,300 or 2,400 lbs. Gearing, too, would be a factor. I think they had something like high-3s or low-4s axle ratio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 09:58 AM
 
8,402 posts, read 24,224,595 times
Reputation: 6822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
I was looking through my magazine collection and found the May, 1989 issue interesting.

In that issue, is a chart showing the fastest 0-60 mph and 1/4 mile times for each year of the cars tested by M/T.

I happened to notice that the $3,000 '68 Dodge Dart 340 had faster acceleration than the $6,000+ '72 Porsche 911S and the $25,000+ 1974 Maserati Bora.

Anyway, informative to compare the figures...


It's the same musclecar vs sports car facts that have always been the case. Musclecars do one thing well-go fast in a straght line. Sports cars do numerous things well, possibly at the expense of supreme performance in one category. The Bora may just have been overpriced for its time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 10:03 AM
 
17,622 posts, read 17,656,125 times
Reputation: 25680
Wow! My 2003 Chevrolet Malibu 3.1L 170 hp V6 is about as fast as a 1978 Porsche 928! Didn't know I had such a sports car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,793,239 times
Reputation: 39453
It is interesting to me how doggy these cars are by today's standards. Only the GTO would be considered a quick car today. The better times listed then are average car times today. Even big 4000 pound sedans are faster than the muscle of the past. However they have todays cars beat on style.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2013, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
2,259 posts, read 4,752,157 times
Reputation: 2346
how is the Pontiac Catalina just as fast as the Cobra...unless it was a 289 Cobra
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top