Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2014, 04:19 PM
 
25 posts, read 44,528 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

i doin't no why anyone needs to miss anything about there old car if they just keep them. plenty of people have just kept there old cars and drive them every day. i have my 59 chevy truck i bought in 71, my 67 ford galaxie i bought in 74 and my 83 chevy plow truck i had given to me 8 years ago. it is so easy to buy new inexpensive aftermarket parts for these cars and trucks you can completely restore them at any level you want and do most of the work yourself and drive them forever CUBA!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2014, 04:24 PM
 
25 posts, read 44,528 times
Reputation: 15
Smile just keep the old one

i doin't no why anyone needs to miss anything about there old car if they just keep them. plenty of people have just kept there old cars and drive them every day. i have my 59 chevy truck i bought in 71, my 67 ford galaxie i bought in 74 and my 83 chevy plow truck i had given to me 8 years ago. it is so easy to buy new inexpensive aftermarket parts for these cars and trucks you can completely restore them at any level you want and do most of the work yourself and drive them forever CUBA!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 01:48 AM
 
2,023 posts, read 5,310,679 times
Reputation: 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
No , it is not. Not this part - "More misinformation. Most of that could be contributed to people not taking care of their batteries, fuel, ignition system and or having their carburetors properly adjusted"

The context was cold winter weather. The previous poster's info was correct and not misinformation. Fact - the big V-8s of the 50s and 60s were dead in the water without help on the bitter cold mornings. Everyone in the northern plains with some grey on their head knows that. There are more factors than just carbureted vs. EFI.


You're wrong....and you're back on ignore.
Don't know about the 50s, but the big v8s of the 60s, 70s and 80s start as good as any mordern fuel injected engine in the winter in the northern plains.

Here is a carbureted 1977 425 Cadillac v8 starting up at -35F in the northern plains.


cold start at -35 degrees - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2014, 06:32 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,710,036 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by 73-79 ford fan View Post
Don't know about the 50s, but the big v8s of the 60s, 70s and 80s start as good as any mordern fuel injected engine in the winter in the northern plains.

Here is a carbureted 1977 425 Cadillac v8 starting up at -35F in the northern plains.


cold start at -35 degrees - YouTube
You'll forgive me, I hope, for weighting my own personal experience from that era more heavily than a silly YouTube video with absolutely unverifiable conditions.

Hard starting, in the absence of engine heaters, in bitter cold temperatures was a fact of life before engines got small and cars got stupid. More than a fair trade-off, I might add. I'll take having to have a heater installed over driving a Honda Civic any day of the week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 07:53 AM
 
25,838 posts, read 16,513,155 times
Reputation: 16024
My old car was a 2005 Ford Explorer Limited. New car is a 2012 Nissan Rogue

-I miss the mass of the vehicle and the weight. I always felt safe in it.


What I don't miss-

-Gas mileage. I went from around 15mpg to averaging 25.

-constant repairs. I had the Explorer towed to the dealership 3 times in 4 years.

-Heat system. The Explorer would blow cold air on the floor from the AC in the summer. They took the dash out and worked it over and afterwards same thing. Our feet would freeze. Nissan's AC works great.

-Ride. Explorer rode rough. Nissan is like a luxury car in comparison.

-Price/Resale. I took a beating on the Explorer. The Nissan Rogue retails for about half new of what a new Explorer Limited-but holds a much higher percentage of it's value. My vehicle expense has dropped dramatically.

This is my second Nissan Rogue and not one visit to the dealership for anything other than oil changes.

I'll never buy Ford again and I drove them for 30 years prior.

My next car? Nissan Pathfinder loaded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
1,780 posts, read 4,023,974 times
Reputation: 929
My old car was 1994 Mercury Grand Marquis. I still miss the cornering lamps that turned on along with its turn signals. Gave great visibility to curbs, potholes, etc on the edge of the road, especially when making tight right turns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 10:26 AM
 
327 posts, read 774,175 times
Reputation: 279
I've only been driving for 20 years, so the oldest car I've owned was a 1988. I miss the smaller size of cars from my childhood. Size creep is real in automobiles, and weight has increased a lot also. It's getting hard to find a sub-3,000 pound car.

When I was 16/17, I worked at a car lot. I spent a lot of time driving a 1985 Toyota pickup around, and I could roll the window down and rest my arm on the door without leaning over. My 2013 Toyota Tacoma is too big to do that without leaning on the door, and it weighs 50% more. Of course the new one can also tow a lot more than that old access cab, and I can haul the family around. I'd love to see more sub-3,000 lb sedans today, and one with rear wheel drive would be a bonus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2014, 09:31 AM
 
51 posts, read 81,455 times
Reputation: 85
I miss my old 95 Ford Exploder. I put 200,000 miles on that thing and never had a single mechanical problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 04:00 AM
 
Location: Santa Rosa
486 posts, read 831,925 times
Reputation: 497
I miss front bench seats and the shiftier on the column, nice to be able to fit 6 people in the sedan when needed. I guess they don't have that any more due to safety issues?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Central Jersey - Florida
3,377 posts, read 14,621,948 times
Reputation: 2272
My old girl friends!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top