Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Born & Raised DC > Carolinas > Seattle > Denver
9,338 posts, read 7,106,572 times
Reputation: 9487
Advertisements
i put a K&A conical air filter on my modified crown vic years ago, I noticed a pretty big difference after I got my performance chip reflashed. had to clean the MAF every 3 months or so though, as lubricant stuff from the filter would get in there.
...I bought a K&N replacement air filter for my 2012 Fusion I-4 that normally gets 29.2 MPG per the dashboard read. I reset the MPG this morning before I left the house...clocked in at 35.5 MPG for my normal commute this morning. Pretty stinkin' sweet for a $38 part I think.
If that is true, then why don't automobile manufacturers (which have WHOLE FLOORS of engineers) install similar filters?
I should think their sales would jump through the roof if this was possible? And they would do so with the quickness if it was possible?
In the past I have read of people who have replaced their factory air filters and not bothered to re-engineer the computer air intake monitoring devices - then had all sorts of problems with their cars.
Basically it is my opinion that all those factory engineers know a WHOLE lot more than "the guy down the street" and the closer to factory specification you keep your vehicle, the better gas mileage you will get...
Make sure you save ALL of your original equipment air cleaner parts so you can reinstall them when you need any warranty work done, if they see the K&N it will void your warranty.
If K&N Filter and Slick 50 really increased fuel mileage, every auto manufacturer would install them on their cars as a cheap way to meet government mandates for higher fuel efficiency without having to spend billions actually designing fuel efficient cars.
Now go buy an OEM filter and reset it again. I bet you'll get similar results. You can't test an old filter vs a new one and expect it to be a fair comparison.
I'll have to try that...although I changed out the Air Filter (OEM) last oil change...was still hovering around 29. I was just impressed to see it go over 30. Time will tell I guess.
Boy there's a lot of misinformation in this thread. K&N filters can make a difference on just about any stock car. The reason?
The stock airbox is designed by all those engineers that work for these auto manufacturers to be quiet. If you buy a full K&N system, you're ditching the stock airbox and usually enlarging the intake piping with smooth piping, rather than the factory rubber hoses which usually are designed to slow down the air velocity a bit, also for noise and emission levels. In short, an aftermarket K&N system can add horsepower, and also increase gas mileage... if you don't drive it any differently than you did before. The engine is working less hard to draw in air than it did before.
Now, in the case with a simple filter swap, the results are generally negligible, except in the case where someone replaces an old dirty filter with a new K&N. That's not a fair comparison to make.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.