Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2015, 05:42 PM
 
1,658 posts, read 2,695,105 times
Reputation: 2285

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
There is nothing wrong with a 1973, if you don't mind those ugly bumpers. It's very easy to re-tune it for much better performance. New intake manifold, 4 barrel carburetor, electronic distributer, headers and a better flowing exhaust system can bring back much of the horsepower that was lost by the EPA regulations that year. In most states classics that age do not require any smog tests, so most people will disconnect all but the PCV valve. Still, my favorite years
were 1969-72, mostly because of the styling.
I received a good deal on a Javelin at the end of the '73 model year and I really liked the styling, especially the grill and bumper. It came with the small 304, 150HP V-8 but it was fun to drive on the highway and got a lot of attention, perhaps because of its plum/white color combo.


https://www.google.com/search?q=1973...FSLapgodXFQGqQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2015, 05:48 PM
 
12,115 posts, read 33,689,401 times
Reputation: 3868
for got the Javelin, refresh my memory, was it around in '73? or did the 74 Matador fastback replace it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2015, 05:56 PM
 
1,658 posts, read 2,695,105 times
Reputation: 2285
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlrl View Post
for got the Javelin, refresh my memory, was it around in '73? or did the 74 Matador fastback replace it?
I believe the last year was 1974, although some cars had 1975 colors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2015, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Butler County Ohio and Winters in Florida
929 posts, read 2,724,186 times
Reputation: 635
I like the 1973 Pontiac Grand Am .
One of my all time favorites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2015, 03:16 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,722,262 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghostrider7811 View Post
I like the 1973 Pontiac Grand Am .
One of my all time favorites.
They were nice cars, but I never cared for the rear styling - much preferred the Grand Prix. Other than that, they were much the same car - and the '73 Grand Prix was one of my all time favorites. Wanted one so bad I could taste it.

Years later, I happened upon a used '77 Cutlass Salon in near mint condition, bought it, and it was the nicest car I've ever owned. No words can do justice to that series....you had to experience them to understand. We have lost so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2015, 04:00 PM
 
3,763 posts, read 5,861,321 times
Reputation: 5550
I bought a '73 Luxury Lemans 4 door at the end of the model year. I had my first job and I was really proud of that car. It had the bigger engine 400cc which meant it went around everything except the gas station. Of course , couple months later , the Arab Oil Embargo hit so learned how to "feather" the gas pedal. The bumpers on the car were ugly but I kept that car for 12 years. My parents had a Delta 88 with the 350 engine which was gutless. It road great but not exciting.

Last edited by Rogarven; 11-11-2015 at 05:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2015, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Sylmar, a part of Los Angeles
8,342 posts, read 6,433,296 times
Reputation: 17463
75 and earlier cars are smog check exempt in Calif. you can modify the engine to your hearts content. Smog checks are a additional expense and hassel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2015, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Butler County Ohio and Winters in Florida
929 posts, read 2,724,186 times
Reputation: 635
Default 1973

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
They were nice cars, but I never cared for the rear styling - much preferred the Grand Prix. Other than that, they were much the same car - and the '73 Grand Prix was one of my all time favorites. Wanted one so bad I could taste it.

Years later, I happened upon a used '77 Cutlass Salon in near mint condition, bought it, and it was the nicest car I've ever owned. No words can do justice to that series....you had to experience them to understand. We have lost so much.
I worked at a gas station as a teenager, one of our good customers had a 1976 Oldsmobile 442.
It was medium blue, white stripes and interior. Loaded interior with console shift and gauges.
455 V8 and a fairly quick rear end gear if I recall properly. I loved that car.
The 76-77 Olds Cultass were sharp in almost all models.
I love the 70s med and full size 2 door cars from GM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2015, 04:07 AM
 
Location: San Diego A.K.A "D.A.Y.G.O City"
1,996 posts, read 4,771,072 times
Reputation: 2743
I think the quality of the cars went to hell around 71-74 and improved around 75 up into the later 70's.

My buddy at work that I didn't even know brought his 73 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham that has little foot rest in the back to work yesterday and I was able to check it out.

As I sat inside the car I was appalled by the cheap plastic everywhere, including the cracks on the dash, and door panels, and loose pull straps. The fitment of the trim was pretty bad considering it being a Cadillac. The seats were really nice and soft, but everything else inside of it was of low quality. Hardly any chrome trim made the interior look extremely bland. Even the exterior panels and trim looked cheap and lacked bright work that stood out since the trim around the windows aren't chrome or stainless like they were in the past, but aluminum oxide and pot metal.

It reminded me of my 72 Cadillac and how much disliked it for those same reasons.

On the other hand the 69-70 models were much better overall. So I can definitely tell and feel the difference from just a few years.

Now GM and Cadillac improved its quality in 75, especially in 77 with it's downsized models. Now I can't speak for all cars, but the early 70's was garbage for quality control at GM.

Not sure how Ford did, but I heard Ford was better in the 70's for it's quality and construction than GM cars for the majority of the decade.

The 50's- early 60's up to about 64 or 65 were the best made cars to ever come out of Detroit from a quality and styling standpoint. It was truly The Golden Era of American automobiles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2015, 04:16 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,722,262 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdlife619 View Post
I think the quality of the cars went to hell around 71-74 and improved around 75 up into the later 70's.

My buddy at work that I didn't even know brought his 73 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham that has little foot rest in the back to work yesterday and I was able to check it out.

As I sat inside the car I was appalled by the cheap plastic everywhere, including the cracks on the dash, and door panels, and loose pull straps. The fitment of the trim was pretty bad considering it being a Cadillac. The seats were really nice and soft, but everything else inside of it was of low quality. Hardly any chrome trim made the interior look extremely bland. Even the exterior panels and trim looked cheap and lacked bright work that stood out since the trim around the windows aren't chrome or stainless like they were in the past, but aluminum oxide and pot metal.

It reminded me of my 72 Cadillac and how much disliked it for those same reasons.

On the other hand the 69-70 models were much better overall. So I can definitely tell and feel the difference from just a few years.

Now GM and Cadillac improved its quality in 75, especially in 77 with it's downsized models. Now I can't speak for all cars, but the early 70's was garbage for quality control at GM.

Not sure how Ford did, but I heard Ford was better in the 70's for it's quality and construction than GM cars for the majority of the decade.

The 50's- early 60's up to about 64 or 65 were the best made cars to ever come out of Detroit from a quality and styling standpoint. It was truly The Golden Era of American automobiles.
I would probably agree with that for GM cars, but not Ford. The late 60s Fords were far superior to the early 60s - and 50s. Ford's big cars changed seismically for the better in '65 and improved over the next few years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top