Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-02-2015, 06:05 AM
 
1 posts, read 947 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

I have a 20 year old suburban that I have kept in good shape. Recently, I had to have two manifold bolts replaced, the fuel filter and the fuel pump. Now I am getting a check engine light for my catalytic converter. It appears to be the only code showing. I don't have the money to repair it.. Should I get a second opinion? What will happen if I just ignore it?

Thanks,

Mike
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-02-2015, 06:24 AM
 
2,600 posts, read 8,795,689 times
Reputation: 2483
1. Get a second opinion.

2. You may have other items causing this as long as its running correctly.

3. A bad catalytic converter can clog up and create excess back pressure in your exhaust which can make your vehicle run badly and consume more gas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2015, 07:01 AM
 
17,598 posts, read 15,272,563 times
Reputation: 22920
Manifold bolts? I presume we're talking exhaust manifold?

That's probably your issue.. "Cat system below efficiency"?

you likely have a leaking exhaust manifold, which is triggering the cat below efficiency code.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2015, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Florida
1,646 posts, read 3,028,207 times
Reputation: 1126
Most cars use a second O2 sensor behind the cat just to monitor the cat's efficiency. A bad O2 sensor there will throw the code, and they are more likely to go bad than the cat itself. If it's running fine and the exhaust smells normal a bad after-cat O2 sensor won't cause ANY drivability problems, just the check engine light. If all seems fine other than the light go ahead and keep running it, won't hurt a thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2015, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Outskirts of Gray Court, and love it!
5,675 posts, read 5,887,642 times
Reputation: 5817
Its 20 years old, stuff is going to wear out! ITs at least a 95, so its not going to be a touchy about stuff as a newer engine. Whats the code?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2015, 10:13 PM
 
17,598 posts, read 15,272,563 times
Reputation: 22920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarborRat View Post
Most cars use a second O2 sensor behind the cat just to monitor the cat's efficiency. A bad O2 sensor there will throw the code, and they are more likely to go bad than the cat itself. If it's running fine and the exhaust smells normal a bad after-cat O2 sensor won't cause ANY drivability problems, just the check engine light. If all seems fine other than the light go ahead and keep running it, won't hurt a thing.
That would actually throw.. If I recall properly.. O2 Bank 1 sensor 3 code.. P0142-ish

vs the "Cat Below Efficiency" of P0420

BUT.. You caught something on post (I think) that I didn't.. OP says it's a 20 year old vehicle, which would put it pre-OBD II.

So.. I'm confused here.. I didn't think OBD1 monitored the cat.. If it's truly a 1995, it should be OBD1, which has no cat codes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2015, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Florida
1,646 posts, read 3,028,207 times
Reputation: 1126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Labonte18 View Post
That would actually throw.. If I recall properly.. O2 Bank 1 sensor 3 code.. P0142-ish

vs the "Cat Below Efficiency" of P0420....
It would actually probably throw both eventually on OBD2 cars. It uses that O2 to know when to throw the P0420 so it will throw that first, and then if the output voltage of that O2 is out of whack too long (and only once drive cycle parameters are met) it will throw the P0142 (actually the P0144 is more likely).


Quote:
Originally Posted by Labonte18 View Post
....
BUT.. You caught something on post (I think) that I didn't.. OP says it's a 20 year old vehicle, which would put it pre-OBD II.

So.. I'm confused here.. I didn't think OBD1 monitored the cat.. If it's truly a 1995, it should be OBD1, which has no cat codes.
Yes, 95 was the last year of OBD1 for most GMs, although a couple models did adopt OBD2 that year. Without knowing the code I guess we will never know . Not all OBD1 cars even had downstream O2 sensors to monitor the cat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2015, 09:18 AM
 
17,598 posts, read 15,272,563 times
Reputation: 22920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarborRat View Post
It would actually probably throw both eventually on OBD2 cars. It uses that O2 to know when to throw the P0420 so it will throw that first, and then if the output voltage of that O2 is out of whack too long (and only once drive cycle parameters are met) it will throw the P0142 (actually the P0144 is more likely).




Yes, 95 was the last year of OBD1 for most GMs, although a couple models did adopt OBD2 that year. Without knowing the code I guess we will never know . Not all OBD1 cars even had downstream O2 sensors to monitor the cat.

True.. The 420 is such a generic code.. I wish I knew the parameters for setting that on some vehicles. I've had that code set when there was an exhaust manifold leak (Actually, there was a hairline crack on the exhaust manifold at the first 'manifold' cat on a vehicle with multiple cats) and when the catalyst has come loose in the housing and many other times.. It rarely actually points to a problem with the cat itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top