Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2017, 12:06 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, LA
1,809 posts, read 5,423,799 times
Reputation: 698

Advertisements

My friend thinks her taurus is better than my Crown Victoria of same year(2000). I'm like "really?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2017, 12:33 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,544,925 times
Reputation: 35437
Better how? Both have pluses and minuses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 12:39 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, LA
1,809 posts, read 5,423,799 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
Better how? Both have pluses and minuses.
In general that is
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 04:32 AM
 
Location: Floribama
18,949 posts, read 43,628,834 times
Reputation: 18760
For Crown Vic/Grand Marquis I prefer 2002 or newer, since those got the redesigned frames and suspension for a better ride. I bought my mother a 2003 Grand Marquis and it rides like a dream.

As far as the original question, while both have pretty good engines (assuming the Taurus has the Vulcan V6), I'd say the Taurus has the weaker transmission. Although both are likely to have problems if the fluid hasn't been changed often enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 05:25 AM
 
Location: Podunk, IA
6,143 posts, read 5,257,894 times
Reputation: 7022
The only Ford sedan worth buying in 2000 was the Contour SVT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 08:24 AM
 
Location: East TX
2,116 posts, read 3,050,294 times
Reputation: 3350
The Crown Vic wasn't really good at anything, but wasn't bad at anything either. It is a solid full-frame car with lots of space, and is relatively simple to work on. The Taurus was next generation and was either benefit or downfall of front wheel drive, depending on personal opinion. Depending on what you want to use it for and what your personal preference is, it all is very subjective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Earth
797 posts, read 752,652 times
Reputation: 798
Crown Vic.
There's a reason why agencies use them.
Get a police interceptor version and your looking at a very reliable vehicle. Roomy as hell too.
Plus if you don't want the auto,any mustang tranny will hook it up to that 4.6.Which a few people have actually done.
Full dyno tune,bolt ons and you got a damn good car.

Not saying Taurus werent good either,but Crown Vic wins my vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 09:02 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,831,000 times
Reputation: 39453
Depends on the year and model. SHO? Manual or automatic transmission?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 09:05 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,269,032 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rynldsbr View Post
The Crown Vic wasn't really good at anything, but wasn't bad at anything either. It is a solid full-frame car with lots of space, and is relatively simple to work on. The Taurus was next generation and was either benefit or downfall of front wheel drive, depending on personal opinion. Depending on what you want to use it for and what your personal preference is, it all is very subjective.
This is why you'd buy a 2000 Crown Vic/Grand Marquis instead of a 2000 Taurus. A 17 year old car is going to break. The low technology RWD car with the enormous engine compartment is going to be much easier to repair as a DIY than any FWD sedan.

You can also probably still find a low mileage garage queen Grand Marquis in estate sales since that was the definitive old people car in 2000. It will have a few old people dents but you know it won't have been beat on. It's the ultimate $2,000 car since the estate executor just wants to get rid of it. It probably has age cracks on the tires, the battery needs to be swapped out, and things like flexible brake lines, ignition wires, and belts are suspect but that's true of any car that has mostly sat for 10 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,544,925 times
Reputation: 35437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackandgold51 View Post
In general that is

Generally the CV is a better all around car. If it's specifics both have pluses and minuses
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top