Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-23-2017, 10:06 AM
 
345 posts, read 250,942 times
Reputation: 303

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperL View Post
Amazing what the brain can forget. The Yamaha built 3.0 V6 that came in the Taurus SHO was absolute crap. Yep, for the time it made a lot of power, but it didn't last long. The engine was prone to timing issues with the cams. It was an interference engine. Most commonly the engine cratered long before the 12 month/ 12,000 mile warranty expired. Ford took a huge beating on this engine. Remarkably, the timing system on the Yamaha 3.0 is identical to the one on the Dodge 4.7. Dodge hasn't had the problems with theirs but designer of both, General Dynamics, warned the Chrysler group that the timing system was prone to failures due to the experiences with the Yamaha engine.
It looks like an expensive thing to construct, although you do get OK overall size from V6s (and balance problems).

I wonder how one of those engines compares to a modern aluminum LSx in terms of HP/lb and fuel consumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2017, 12:43 PM
 
Location: East TX
2,116 posts, read 3,054,708 times
Reputation: 3350
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperL View Post
Amazing what the brain can forget. The Yamaha built 3.0 V6 that came in the Taurus SHO was absolute crap. Yep, for the time it made a lot of power, but it didn't last long. The engine was prone to timing issues with the cams. It was an interference engine. Most commonly the engine cratered long before the 12 month/ 12,000 mile warranty expired. Ford took a huge beating on this engine. Remarkably, the timing system on the Yamaha 3.0 is identical to the one on the Dodge 4.7. Dodge hasn't had the problems with theirs but designer of both, General Dynamics, warned the Chrysler group that the timing system was prone to failures due to the experiences with the Yamaha engine.
Knew several people that had good luck with them and made well over 100k with no major issues. Perhaps the people that drove them like Days of Thunder and didn't maintain them had issues?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 04:51 PM
 
Location: Niceville, FL
13,258 posts, read 22,878,826 times
Reputation: 16418
Spousal Unit bought a used Taurus SHO with allegedly 80K miles on it back in his grad school days. It was dead in our driveway before we finished paying the loan off, largely because of engine issues.

That experience put me firmly on the 'only buy new because then you know exactly where it's been' camp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 08:05 PM
 
345 posts, read 250,942 times
Reputation: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachmouse View Post
Spousal Unit bought a used Taurus SHO with allegedly 80K miles on it back in his grad school days. It was dead in our driveway before we finished paying the loan off, largely because of engine issues.

That experience put me firmly on the 'only buy new because then you know exactly where it's been' camp.
C'est la vie.

I can't think of much of anything post 1971 that's worth rebuilding (Turbo Regal maybe?).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Midwest
9,446 posts, read 11,201,706 times
Reputation: 18005
SHO was Super High Output IIRC. As noted above, it was also Super High Cost and it had some reliability issues as it piled the miles on.

I had a '92 bright red SHO. I had every Tom, Dick, and Harry challenge me at stoplights and from a roll on the highway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2017, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Louisville KY
4,856 posts, read 5,833,783 times
Reputation: 4341
Quote:
Originally Posted by kapikap View Post
there you go, the festiva shogun. I could swear it was used in the ford escort, merkur xr4ti, in very limited numbers???

anyway, the sho in a festiva is like putting a v6 vtec in a civic, vr6 in a gti, with a good tune and turbo, forgetaboutit!
Nope Escort GT and EXP, Mercur XR4Ti used a 2.3(turbo for Mercur). Escort never had a v6. The V6 was midmounted in the Festiva, the idea was based on a particular Renault that was converted to midengine and used in WRC, group B I think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2017, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Louisville KY
4,856 posts, read 5,833,783 times
Reputation: 4341
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpstateJohn View Post
The Festiva SHOgun was never a production car. Only 7 were built. There was also one, officially, built SHO Ranger, built by Jack Rousch.
They also sold bodykits, and many people have made SHOgun clones. The wheels and supertrapp mufflers ehere easy to get. they weren't super great, but they better than in the Taurus as far as performance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2017, 08:52 PM
 
Location: Outskirts of Gray Court, and love it!
5,680 posts, read 5,909,490 times
Reputation: 5830
Quote:
Originally Posted by JaxRhapsody View Post
Nope Escort GT and EXP, Mercur XR4Ti used a 2.3(turbo for Mercur). Escort never had a v6. The V6 was midmounted in the Festiva, the idea was based on a particular Renault that was converted to midengine and used in WRC, group B I think.
Escort and EXP had the 1.6ltr up to 85. GT was turbo charged IIRC. Then it was upgraded to a 2.0. The EXP never saw the 2.0. The XR4Ti was a 2.3ltr turbocharged engine. The "Escort EXP" used a 2.0 engine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2017, 09:03 PM
 
5,481 posts, read 8,593,272 times
Reputation: 8284
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperL View Post
Amazing what the brain can forget. The Yamaha built 3.0 V6 that came in the Taurus SHO was absolute crap. Yep, for the time it made a lot of power, but it didn't last long. The engine was prone to timing issues with the cams. It was an interference engine. Most commonly the engine cratered long before the 12 month/ 12,000 mile warranty expired. Ford took a huge beating on this engine. Remarkably, the timing system on the Yamaha 3.0 is identical to the one on the Dodge 4.7. Dodge hasn't had the problems with theirs but designer of both, General Dynamics, warned the Chrysler group that the timing system was prone to failures due to the experiences with the Yamaha engine.
I recall the v8 SHO having some cam issues where they had to be welded. I know because I owned a 97 SHO with the v8.

The V6 yamaha's were pretty bulletproof if you ask me. I know because I owned 3 of them all with over 100k miles and no engine issues whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2017, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
10,001 posts, read 5,711,232 times
Reputation: 22161
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperL View Post
Amazing what the brain can forget. The Yamaha built 3.0 V6 that came in the Taurus SHO was absolute crap. Yep, for the time it made a lot of power, but it didn't last long. The engine was prone to timing issues with the cams. It was an interference engine. Most commonly the engine cratered long before the 12 month/ 12,000 mile warranty expired. Ford took a huge beating on this engine. Remarkably, the timing system on the Yamaha 3.0 is identical to the one on the Dodge 4.7. Dodge hasn't had the problems with theirs but designer of both, General Dynamics, warned the Chrysler group that the timing system was prone to failures due to the experiences with the Yamaha engine.
The 3.0 and 3.2 were virtually bullet-proof as long as you performed proper preventative maintenance on them. It was the 3.4 V8 in the 3rd-gen SHO that had the timing issues. The cams were sleeved onto the sprockets without adequate reinforcement, so sometimes the sprocket would out-spin the camshaft under heavy load and that's when you had serious timing issues and possibly destroyed valves and pistons. It was a major problem when it happened but there was a simple preventative fix using a roll pin to reinforce the sprocket/cam sleeve joint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top