Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-09-2017, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Rural Michigan
6,343 posts, read 14,676,901 times
Reputation: 10548

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
So are you saying that Ford took bailout money (disproven) or that GM did not fail due to bad management?
If so, please show with factual data that backs your opinion up.

Not so quick with "disproven"...

All in all, Ford took in $14.5 billion in loans and Ford Motor Credit, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford Motor Company, took in $5 billion in TARP funds. $19.5 billion total in Government funds.

Cash for clunkers was a bailout - one that benefitted many non-us manufacturers as well as GM. Ford sold a *lot* of cars during cash for clunkers based on PR from those who thought ford was "better" than GM because they didn't take a bailout. The only reason they didn't take a bailout was because they had *lots* of cash, that they were in process of handling over to the ford family when the wheels came off. This is extremely well documented & you could find that info if you cared to look, instead of spouting off anti-American anti-Union talking points that have been thoroughly disproven.

And GM did not fail due to bad management.

GM had $20 billion dollars in the bank at the end of 2007.

They could lose a few billion a year for *many* years before they would have (possibly) tanked..

Please, name a large operation that can survive losing half their sales overnight?

Leasing was 35% of the market (not just GM) before the crash & leasing literally dried up in just a few days.

Loans were no better. I knew dealers & they were flabbergasted that buyers with great credit were getting denied for (good) loans.

Banks *completely* stopped lending.

And, while we're talking about "bad management"..

Howabout opening a brand-new-full-sized truck plant about a minute before gas prices topped $4 a gallon?

GM?

No..

Toyota..

Toyota's U.S. workers avoid layoff threat for now | Reuters

Last edited by Zippyman; 09-09-2017 at 11:37 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-09-2017, 11:22 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,938,286 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian_M View Post
Tesla is just a transfer of wealth, tax money to Musk's pocket. End that stupid subsidy, exactly like China did, and see sales plummet. China went to ZERO sales, I think there are enough virtual signaling rich people in the Us that would still buy one though. Gotta have Something to brag about....
People who buy teslas aren't doing it because of a stupid government subsidy. Its 100k car the subsidy is a bonus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2017, 11:52 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 26,996,167 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zippyman View Post
Not so quick with "disproven"...

All in all, Ford took in $14.5 billion in loans and Ford Motor Credit, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford Motor Company, took in $5 billion in TARP funds. $19.5 billion total in Government funds.

Cash for clunkers was a bailout - one that benefitted many non-us manufacturers as well as GM. Ford sold a *lot* of cars during cash for clunkers based on PR from those who thought ford was "better" than GM because they didn't take a bailout. The only reason they didn't take a bailout was because they had *lots* of cash, that they were in process of handling over to the ford family when the wheels came off. This is extremely well documented & you could find that info if you cared to look, instead of spouting off anti-American anti-Union talking points that have been thoroughly disproven.

And GM did not fail due to bad management.

GM had $20 billion dollars in the bank at the end of 2007.

They could lose a few billion a year for *many* years before they would have (possibly) tanked..

Please, name a large operation that can survive losing half their sales overnight?

Leasing was 35% of the market (not just GM) before the crash & leasing literally dried up in just a few days.

Loans were no better. I knew dealers & they were flabbergasted that buyers with great credit were getting denied for (good) loans.

Banks *completely* stopped lending.

And, while we're talking about "bad management"..

Howabout opening a brand-new-full-sized truck plant about a minute before gas prices topped $4 a gallon?

GM?

No..

Toyota..

Toyota's U.S. workers avoid layoff threat for now | Reuters
I see you conveniently missed (ignored) my post after that, a post that shoots your bailout claims right in the butt.
As for bad management, we weren't talking about Toyota or any other foreign company.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2017, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Rural Michigan
6,343 posts, read 14,676,901 times
Reputation: 10548
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
I see you conveniently missed (ignored) my post after that, a post that shoots your bailout claims right in the butt.
As for bad management, we weren't talking about Toyota or any other foreign company.
Lol, whatever dude - if the truth hurts, it's surely "fake" amirite?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2017, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Coastal Mid-Atlantic
6,734 posts, read 4,413,618 times
Reputation: 8360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
Of course it's not going to upend anything. Electric cars are niche vehicles.
Hybrids came out 20 years ago and peaked in 2013 at 3.2% of the auto market.
I would say end, not upend. The range is just not there. Battery technology hasnt come along fast enough to keep up, or have the ability to self charge as your're driving. This it needs, but just hasn't been done efficiently enough just yet. Now people know of the $9,000 it will need to replace the batteries down the road. Tesla is a high end niche vehicle, less the technology it needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2017, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,229 posts, read 18,561,496 times
Reputation: 25798
I don't think any electric car will upend the industry, as there is really no need, nor benefits to electric cars. In fact they are a detriment in many ways except some torque which isn't really necessary anyway. My gasoline vehicle has plenty of torque.

Electric cars are an answer to a question not asked, but hey whatever floats your boat. Choices are great, just don't use my money to subsidies them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2017, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, MN
10,244 posts, read 16,364,120 times
Reputation: 5308
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
So are you saying that Ford took bailout money (disproven) or that GM did not fail due to bad management?
If so, please show with factual data that backs your opinion up.
This website tracks all the recipients of the bailout money:
Bailout List: Banks, Auto Companies, and More | Eye on the Bailout | ProPublica

GM was given $51 billion and Chrysler was given $11 billion. Ford was not a bailout recipient.

The only companies that got more than GM in the bailout were Fannie May, Freddie Mac and AIG.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2017, 02:40 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,568,036 times
Reputation: 22772
Tesla reported a wider loss and higher cash burn than expected today. They also only delivered 260 model 3's for the month but tried to reassure they were on target to get to 5000 per week by late q1 of 2018
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 09:11 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 26,996,167 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Tesla reported a wider loss and higher cash burn than expected today. They also only delivered 260 model 3's for the month but tried to reassure they were on target to get to 5000 per week by late q1 of 2018
The thing to be watched is who's cash is being burned, there's or ours (as in govt. subsidies).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2017, 10:02 AM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,939,336 times
Reputation: 6842
Musk makes outlandish promises, stock jumps, then those promises fail to deliver and stock crashes. When are people going to stop falling for this nonsense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top