Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Wellesley, MA
58 posts, read 43,902 times
Reputation: 49

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Most people don’t own the same house for 30 years so the example doesn’t really match reality. On average a mortgage is paid off between years 7-9 sometimes by a refinance and others by selling which often results in a new mortgage
That's irrelevant.

 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:40 PM
 
18,548 posts, read 15,586,958 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
... but I will be guaranteed to lose money by renting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
No because I’m paying less than a renter per month. I’m the one with the extra income per month and I’m the one guaranteed to be both rent and mortgage free in another few years, then my cost will be negligible. My cost are fixed to the day I started my mortgage while yours will always be indexed for inflation. Your rent will not be the same every month for 30 years.
You are attempting to creatively redefine what a "loss" is in order to argue your point of view. In the previous post you said renting is a loss. This is only the case if you ignore the benefit of having a roof over one's head. And now you are saying that owning is beneficial because you are assuming you must have a roof over your head one way or the other.

You cannot have it both ways.

Another way of looking at this is that if you say owning is not a loss when it costs less than rent, then you must also, to be consistent, say renting is not a loss because renting is not more than renting!

Either you are talking about the cost relative to rent, or you are talking about the cost in absolute terms.

The fact that you have to be inconsistent with your definition of "loss" speaks volumes about the validity of your argument.
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:46 PM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,948,338 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
You aren’t defining capitalism or pretty much defining it and you couldn’t be more off base with the definition. You are entirely clueless on how things actually work. Im a homeowner btw and I think I’ve mentioned it multiple times in this thread.
Then you should be renting. You’re not following your own advice.
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:52 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,587,222 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
Sure they are. I might need a new roof or hvac within 30 years, but I can amortize that into my cost.
Sorry you are lost. Your cost to own are never fixed. Insurance, tax and maintenance make this impossible to be true. Again you keep up with nonsense even when it’s clear you are wrong

Quote:
I can even get a tax deduction on the interest of a home equity line of credit to pay for it if I wanted to.
Whoa whoa whoa is this a bit of that over selling I was speaking of? Yes yes it is exactly. Thanks for accepting it and walking right into it for me.

Quote:
Regardless, it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the equity and appreciation I’m making. In another few years my mortgage cost is reduced to just insurance and taxes so I’m good either way.
I think this actually translates to “I know my cost aren’t fixed even though I just tried to argue they were”
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:53 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,587,222 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanquishedagain View Post
That's irrelevant.
No it isn’t, your comparison you attempted to make doesn’t match what people actually do. It’s fwr from irrelevant
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:53 PM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,948,338 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
You are attempting to creatively redefine what a "loss" is in order to argue your point of view. In the previous post you said renting is a loss. This is only the case if you ignore the benefit of having a roof over one's head. And now you are saying that owning is beneficial because you are assuming you must have a roof over your head one way or the other.

You cannot have it both ways.

Another way of looking at this is that if you say owning is not a loss when it costs less than rent, then you must also, to be consistent, say renting is not a loss because renting is not more than renting!

Either you are talking about the cost relative to rent, or you are talking about the cost in absolute terms.

The fact that you have to be inconsistent with your definition of "loss" speaks volumes about the validity of your argument.
And you’re accusing me of being creative?

Call it whatever you want, but you need a home. You can either pay someone else’s mortgage so you can use theirs or you can pay for your own and cut out the middle man.
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:55 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,587,222 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
Then you should be renting. You’re not following your own advice.
You just lack the ability to read and comprehend things because I’ve never said people shouldn’t buy so I’m not really sure what advice you think I’ve given that I’m not following. The financial benefits to owning are oversold, period. For the millionth time that doesn’t mean there aren’t financial benefits to owning just that the benefits are oversold every day
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Wellesley, MA
58 posts, read 43,902 times
Reputation: 49
The level of stupidity on this thread is making my head hurt. Renting is a guaranteed loss. Most of the time buying is not a loss or at least is a MUCH smaller loss. These are facts, this little group of trolls here are the only people I've ever heard try to argue otherwise. This conversation also has zero to do with the OP, lol.
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:58 PM
 
18,548 posts, read 15,586,958 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy100 View Post
And you’re accusing me of being creative?

Call it whatever you want, but you need a home. You can either pay someone else’s mortgage so you can use theirs or you can pay for your own and cut out the middle man.
Paying rent is not paying someone else's mortgage. It is paying for the temporary use of someone else's property. Whether the landlord has a mortgage or not has no effect on the rent I pay, as the latter is set by the rental market.
 
Old 05-13-2018, 03:59 PM
 
9,613 posts, read 6,948,338 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
No it isn’t, your comparison you attempted to make doesn’t match what people actually do. It’s fwr from irrelevant
You’re going to have to keep it simple if you want to make an apples to apples comparison. Yes people buy more house than they need, yes they upgrade and refinance and add pools and buy even bigger and bigger houses and more acreage. That’s not at all a rent vs own argument. Claiming “it’s not what people actually do” is just purposely trying to muddy the waters to obscure what’s otherwise fairly straight forward.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top