Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-03-2019, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, TX
3,255 posts, read 1,720,391 times
Reputation: 1081

Advertisements

Too much, ok to start experimenting or just a gray opinion on it?


For me, if you want to really work on futuristic designs, then first you gotta make sure the technology naturally flows, then try to also work on aerodynamics a bit


Seems like too many car manufacturers are trying to outperform in the looks department without even going for more internal factors anymore
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2019, 09:16 AM
 
19,034 posts, read 27,599,679 times
Reputation: 20273
If you were to look at this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Wmls-UTox0


you'd notice 2 trends:
1. flashy futuristic designs (gods, Lexus went nuts)
2. absolutely minimalist designs



I think, they started catering to those who have crow's taste - whatever shines is valued and, those who are tired of Lexus or Nissan type crazed outbursts.
Unfortunately, nothing inbetween.

Otherwise, with body removed, they are all pretty much same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2019, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, TX
3,255 posts, read 1,720,391 times
Reputation: 1081
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukrkoz View Post
If you were to look at this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Wmls-UTox0


you'd notice 2 trends:
1. flashy futuristic designs (gods, Lexus went nuts)
2. absolutely minimalist designs



I think, they started catering to those who have crow's taste - whatever shines is valued and, those who are tired of Lexus or Nissan type crazed outbursts.
Unfortunately, nothing inbetween.

Otherwise, with body removed, they are all pretty much same.
And how do you feel certain colors becoming more popular choices now such as solar yellow, banana yellow, dandelion, charcoal grey, destroyer grey, army green, leaf lavender, royal purple and of course, flame orange?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2019, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Cebu, Philippines
5,869 posts, read 4,210,466 times
Reputation: 10942
There will always be a trade off, between fashion on the one hand, and performance issues like aerodynamics, weight distribution, illumination, safety, and all the rest. It will be for government regulators and the marktplace to resolve, which will be done in a day-to-day basis, so "futuristic" is not yet known.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2019, 07:09 PM
 
Location: Floribama
18,949 posts, read 43,612,080 times
Reputation: 18760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciano700 View Post
And how do you feel certain colors becoming more popular choices now such as solar yellow, banana yellow, dandelion, charcoal grey, destroyer grey, army green, leaf lavender, royal purple and of course, flame orange?
Colors are more subdued now than they were in the mid 90s. I remember the bright teal green and raspberry purple.

https://www.mecum.com/lots/FL0119-35...e-car-edition/

http://gtcarlot.com/colors/car/27626361-3.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2019, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, TX
3,255 posts, read 1,720,391 times
Reputation: 1081
Quote:
Originally Posted by cebuan View Post
There will always be a trade off, between fashion on the one hand, and performance issues like aerodynamics, weight distribution, illumination, safety, and all the rest. It will be for government regulators and the marktplace to resolve, which will be done in a day-to-day basis, so "futuristic" is not yet known.
Sure, but mandations are becoming also less or more strictly obvious over time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2019, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, TX
3,255 posts, read 1,720,391 times
Reputation: 1081
Quote:
Originally Posted by southernnaturelover View Post
Colors are more subdued now than they were in the mid 90s. I remember the bright teal green and raspberry purple.

https://www.mecum.com/lots/FL0119-35...e-car-edition/

1996 Raspberry Metallic Chevrolet Cavalier Coupe #27626361 Photo #3 | GTCarLot.com - Car Color Galleries
Hmmm interesting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2019, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,537,436 times
Reputation: 35437
The designs on today’s cars are similar due to pedestrian impact safety requirements.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2019, 01:26 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,841,834 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciano700 View Post
Too much, ok to start experimenting or just a gray opinion on it?


For me, if you want to really work on futuristic designs, then first you gotta make sure the technology naturally flows, then try to also work on aerodynamics a bit


Seems like too many car manufacturers are trying to outperform in the looks department without even going for more internal factors anymore

automotive design is a tricky thing these days. start with the aerodynamics. the wind tells you what works best, not the eye. the only way to truly find what works best is to get the design into the wind tunnel and see what the airflow says.


as for internal factors, i presume you are talking about power train performance. and that gets into interesting areas, including regulations and cost factors. but note that the ford ecoboost V6 today puts out more power than the boss 429 of the late 60s, while sipping fuel compared to the boss that sucks it down like its free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2019, 06:07 AM
 
8,272 posts, read 10,991,123 times
Reputation: 8910
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
automotive design is a tricky thing these days. start with the aerodynamics. the wind tells you what works best, not the eye. the only way to truly find what works best is to get the design into the wind tunnel and see what the airflow says.
1934 Chrysler Airflow.

Already been done.

Today, the designs are many times for the young hipster dufusses who want to look "cool".

Yet, most, if not all, who purchase these obscenely ugly vehicles do not think of themselves as a hipster dufuss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top