U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you like the fact that gas companies are putting "10% or less" ethanol in gas?
Yes 6 10.53%
No 48 84.21%
Undecided 3 5.26%
Voters: 57. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2014, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Keosauqua, Iowa
9,550 posts, read 20,028,022 times
Reputation: 13407

Advertisements

I support ethanol - I've used it since it's been on the market, no adverse affects, no noticeable decrease in overall performance in my experience - but not corn ethanol simply because it's not cost-effective for the consumer without government subsides. There are options available that appear to be much better, such as hemp which I noted above, but they aren't being actively researched possibly due to the lobbying power of the NCGA.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2014, 04:58 PM
 
33,389 posts, read 32,731,010 times
Reputation: 19983
Quote:
Originally Posted by duster1979 View Post
I support ethanol - I've used it since it's been on the market, no adverse affects, no noticeable decrease in overall performance in my experience - but not corn ethanol simply because it's not cost-effective for the consumer without government subsides. There are options available that appear to be much better, such as hemp which I noted above, but they aren't being actively researched possibly due to the lobbying power of the NCGA.
yes hemp is another good alternative for ethanol fuel as well, though sugar is still better.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2014, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Poway, CA
2,698 posts, read 11,588,037 times
Reputation: 2243
Not a fan of ethanol due to its negative effect on motorcycles and other small engines, especially when the mix is 15% or higher. At a minimum, labeling for ethanol at gas stations needs to be more standardized and clear, not unlike how octane rating stickers are basically universal nationwide.

Mike
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 09:47 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,717 posts, read 15,497,525 times
Reputation: 41813
Ethanol has been horrible for the consumer. We get at least 10% worse mileage with it and tons of companies are making a fortune selling additives to combat the effects of it (Startron, Stabil, etc) My one car sits in my shop for weeks at a time and when I go to use it a lot of the fuel in the tank has evaporated from just sitting there. Not to mention what it does to the fuel system.

More and more stations are beginning to offer non ethanol pumps as an alternative, and when I have been able to find them my car runs so much better and I get MUCH better gas mileage. Hope they finally see the light and stop making it.

Don
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2014, 01:26 AM
 
Location: Louisville KY
4,737 posts, read 5,243,812 times
Reputation: 4167
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
If the media you ascribe to supports big oil you hate ethanol, but if you support buying American then ethanol is good. Either way there's absolutely zero affect, because your o2 adjusts accordingly. Ethanol does leave a smaller carbon footprint, and can create more power.
It has a lower octane rating than gasoline.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2014, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,572 posts, read 11,597,094 times
Reputation: 5106
Quote:
Originally Posted by JaxRhapsody View Post
It has a lower octane rating than gasoline.
Incorrect:

Ethanol's higher octane rating allows an increase of an engine's compression ratio for increased thermal efficiency.

Ethanol fuel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2014, 01:31 PM
 
1,091 posts, read 976,857 times
Reputation: 2844
Ooops...I meant a NO, and voted a Yes.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2014, 05:50 PM
 
17,501 posts, read 24,180,534 times
Reputation: 19301
Hmmm...
Ethanol was lobbyed in here by corn producing states, that were basically going broke, if not for government support to what they produce. Corn. Then that plague spread everywhere, as it was same time "good for business" - poorer mpg, engines wear out faster, as alcohol removes oil film from moving parts.
In Brzil, it was different situation. Brazil is one of the largest grain producers. They were hit by lack of demand for grains, from international buyers, and landed with dilemma - do we let our farmers go broke, or come up with something to help them out. So, they came up with gasohol.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2014, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,572 posts, read 11,597,094 times
Reputation: 5106
Here's a great read on ethanol use in the US. It's been in our gas since the 70's and is great for our economy, and reduces our dependence on foreign oil imports.

Ethanol fuel in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2014, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Louisville KY
4,737 posts, read 5,243,812 times
Reputation: 4167
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
Incorrect:

Ethanol's higher octane rating allows an increase of an engine's compression ratio for increased thermal efficiency.

Ethanol fuel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
which is why there is a fad of converting force inducted engines to run on it, versus 93(or whatevers highest in ones area) gas. Not too much need for advancing engine timing, or blah, blah, blah. It still takes a lot more of it to the equivalent of gasoline. I'd rather have gasoline that e85.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top