Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which was the better sports car?
Mazda RX-7 13 31.71%
Acura NSX 28 68.29%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-09-2008, 12:16 PM
 
1,048 posts, read 2,388,185 times
Reputation: 421

Advertisements

I never cared for the RX-7, at least in that guise. It was an extremely delicate car, and a lot of them never really ran all that well in the real world. People that I nknew that had them were extremely displeased, especially if they'd owned a previous iteration of the 7.

The NSX was pretty much bulletproof, although I do recall some alignment issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-09-2008, 12:24 PM
 
3,743 posts, read 13,704,794 times
Reputation: 2787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Worley View Post
I never cared for the RX-7, at least in that guise. It was an extremely delicate car, and a lot of them never really ran all that well in the real world. People that I nknew that had them were extremely displeased, especially if they'd owned a previous iteration of the 7.

The NSX was pretty much bulletproof, although I do recall some alignment issues.
Yes, the FD RX-7 (1992-1995 in the US) was poorly engineered and developed a poor reliability reputation. The NSX was well engineered, if unchanged, for 10 years - by the time it ended production is was overpriced and underpowered, but it always had solid reliability. That's why I limited the discussion to "blue sky" comparisons - running well, on a good day, when both cars were superstars in the early 90s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2008, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Kansas
3,855 posts, read 13,268,829 times
Reputation: 1734
The best of the 3rd gen RX-7's weren't sold in the US though. Specifically the Series 8's ('99-'02) More powerful by 25 horses, improved braking and suspension, etc. They were only available in Japan. Too bad they weren't available to the rest of the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2008, 04:54 PM
kbg
 
Location: Chester County, Tennessee
223 posts, read 345,978 times
Reputation: 77
The Wankel Rotary should be enough to sway anyone with mechanical couth to steer clear of the anemic Mazda, now how about the old Datsun/Nissan 240Z with the big straight 6cyl. with the 4-speed, I once owned a '72 and always regreted selling her! I out run countless Chevy V-8's and never had a minutes trouble out of that little beast and sold it to a friend for $600 & a shotgun about 15 yrs ago! Damn it!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2008, 06:05 PM
 
93 posts, read 165,859 times
Reputation: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1979 View Post
Comparing an NSX to an RX7 is like comparing an S-class Mercedes to a Saturn.
Quite right. Not a fair comparison.

I owned an RX-7 Turbo and it was a great car. Very fast, loads of features and very reliable. I would love to drive an NSX some day. Truly one of the great modern sports cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2008, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Purgatory (A.K.A. Dallas, Texas)
5,007 posts, read 15,423,702 times
Reputation: 2463
I'll still take a 96 Supra Twin Turbo over either one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2008, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Phoenix metro
20,004 posts, read 77,392,370 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sayantsi View Post
Its funny you mention that, as it shows how perception colors the opinion. Just as an example, the RX-7 had a 0-60 of 5.1 sec and topped out around 160 mph. The NSX had a 5.6 sec 0-60 time and top speed of 165 mph. The NSX cost $30k more than the RX-7, but the performance of both cars was basically identical. Production numbers were low for both, but somehow the NSX was branded a Ferrari killer and the RX-7 was not, yet both had superior numbers.
Ive seen NSXs run much quicker than 5.6 seconds. RX-7's, while neat, were problematic. The NSX looks eons better to me and is definitely a lot more reliable. Performance is near equal on both, but the NSX is just stunning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2008, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC & New York
10,914 posts, read 31,400,832 times
Reputation: 7137
The NSX would win this comparison in my book since it redefined a category of exotic sports cars. It represented a forward-thinking, stellar approach to the possibility of a true sports car in the vein of a Ferrari that ran well and had few reliability issues, tires aside.

The RX-7 of that generation was fine for an everyday car, but it had lost its luster and had begun the morph into the sporty boulevardier that came next in the RX-8. I don't blame Mazda for this, however, since Nissan and Toyota abandoned their sports coupes at the same time, and Mazda was trying to be true to the roots of the sports car while trying to sell something people would purchase. However, when Nissan came back on the scene with the 350z, that changed things, especially in light of the RX-8.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2008, 10:19 AM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
7,688 posts, read 29,156,794 times
Reputation: 3631
Quote:
Originally Posted by getmeoutofhere View Post
I'll still take a 96 Supra Twin Turbo over either one.
That's reflected in the sky-high resale price. A low-mileage example is still worth about the original MSRP ten years later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2008, 11:14 AM
 
465 posts, read 1,417,733 times
Reputation: 131
If I had a choice I'd rather own a NSX. But those wankels have awesome power to displacement ratios, I think most of them are 1.3 liters. Just imagine if someone built a car with a big one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top