Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Was his driving down the road 63 mph a problem? If so, why is it that you and all the other tail-gater defenders here are bit*hing about something else?
If you had read the thread, you would know that KYJellyDad was driving 63 mph down a 2-lane highway, where the speed zone was 55 mph.
Some idiot bonehead - who very likely drives EXACTLY like several of the members here - came up behind him and rode his bumper. He didn't pass him, he just rode his bumper.
THAT was the problem. How can you fail to understand that?
The idiocy that ensued from that point is another matter entirely.
And this one. These are only the most recent.
As you state it here is seems reasonable...
UNTIL you consider KY's original post where his solution was to willfully cause an accident.
Was his driving down the road 63 mph a problem? If so, why is it that you and all the other tail-gater defenders here are bit*hing about something else?
You are still avoiding the main point here, his original post!
My problem is that he advocated SLAMMING on his brakes to cause an accident!
You are not understanding this at all are you?
No no, I understand it perfectly. It's YOU that's in the fog. I am defending nothing other than a person's right to drive down the road, minding their own business, without having some road-rage butt-hole riding their bumper.
Now... Find where I've defended brake checking, or just hang it up.
Omaha, the OP is what started all this, you are missing THAT point.
Of COURSE the OP started all this. The OP starts EVERY thread.
Now... Why don't you find me the quote where I was defending him slamming on his brakes? You KNOW you've been trying to find it.
What I am defending is his - and everyone else's right - to drive down a highway, minding their own business, without having some road-rage redneck a-hole (the likes of several members here) riding his bumper in order to prove how macho they are. THAT is what I am defending.
If you don't like it, don't be that a-hole redneck I mentioned...
Of COURSE the OP started all this. The OP starts EVERY thread.
Now... Why don't you find me the quote where I was defending him slamming on his brakes? You KNOW you've been trying to find it.
What I am defending is his - and everyone else's right - to drive down a highway, minding their own business, without having some road-rage redneck a-hole (the likes of several members here) riding his bumper in order to prove how macho they are. THAT is what I am defending.
If you don't like it, don't be that a-hole redneck I mentioned...
I was referring to KYdads post and how you leave out the fact that he advocated slamming on his brakes and causing an accident, a point that you seem to ignore.
I have stated repeatedly that tailgating is unsafe and illegal. Most of us agree with that.
I agree with you that folks should not be tailgated.
Do you agree that they should not purposely cause an accident if they are?
I was referring to KYdads post and how you leave out the fact that he advocated slamming on his brakes and causing an accident, a point that you seem to ignore.
I have stated repeatedly that tailgating is unsafe and illegal. Most of us agree with that.
I agree with you that folks should not be tailgated.
Do you agree that they should not purposely cause an accident if they are?
Of course. Where have I ever stated anything different?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.