Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you have the current issue of CR, its the auto review. The 3 series actually has above average reliability as a whole, compared to only average for the TL.
As a brand, Acura may be more reliable, but the specific models give the nod to BMW.
I think Consumer Reports pegs TL reliability below 3 reliability, actually.
If you have the current issue of CR, its the auto review. The 3 series actually has above average reliability as a whole, compared to only average for the TL.
As a brand, Acura may be more reliable, but the specific models give the nod to BMW.
wow, really. I do have a subscription to CR, and just got the April edition, I'll take a look, thanks. is this true from a used or new perspective?
i had an acura many moons ago and absolutely loved it so if i had any influence over this decision, that's what i'd go with, but alas, I don't. i like to see what other people say though!
First off, the OP is asking about older cars, not current generation.
Secondly, the M5 and CTS-V run basically the same, performance-wise (even though the CTS carries an additional 56 HP and another 168 ft. pounds of torque, so it's a little embarrassing that it doesn't soundly beat the M5), with every review of them dogging the CTS for its sub-par interior and fit and finish.
Also, the M5 is a 3-year-old car, the CTS-V is brand-new. Given that, the CTS should be spanking the M5, not scratching by.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.