Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-13-2022, 06:11 PM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
7,702 posts, read 5,446,630 times
Reputation: 16219

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
...Too many things can go wrong, and too many pilots have egos the size of a city that make them believe they can never do anything wrong. ....
I knew a pilot with an ego like that. He was a very humble man in general, and my dearest friend as a teenager (and we kept in touch throughout the years, the sort of friendship where we'd laugh out loud at the first sound of each other's voice), but he used to brag that he was so good that he could fly the box the plane came in.

As it turns out, he couldn't, and I lost the best friend I ever had to a fiery plane crash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2022, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,555 posts, read 10,607,780 times
Reputation: 36567
Quote:
Originally Posted by TamaraSavannah View Post
It is rather interesting to see where one's focus is. Been thru the first page.....and no mention of what the B 17 was called and for those of us in such worlds, that is what we lock in on.
I've noticed that too. I've looked at the Commemorative Air Force page and the page about the Dallas show and the only thing I can find is that it MIGHT have been the Texas Raider. Seems like that's something that they could have included as part of their announcement.

I've seen two airworthy B-17s (Memphis Belle and Sentimental Journey) and one B-29 (Fifi) at air shows. Much as I'd love to take a ride in one, the high cost has discouraged me from doing so. The loss of this B-17, while not on the same level as the loss of the people aboard, is still a painful blow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2022, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Western PA
10,823 posts, read 4,506,581 times
Reputation: 6667
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutdoorLover View Post
Well, I don't know the larger context, but the B17 is flying much slower and is rapidly overtaken by the P-63 coming in from behind and above it, so if anyone is at fault, it seems like it's the P-63. Thing is, it looks like he just stayed locked in his track and flew straight into the B-17, it's a direct hit. (and no, I am not trying to imply anyone did anything on purpose). Does anyone know anything about how these pilots are supposed to coordinate their paths in these air shows? I assume it's not just a chaotic free-for-all?
behind and above is the ideal attack profile for a prop aircraft, especially one built to strafe ground targets.


visibility out of one of these, ESPECIALLY forward and down and outward is actually pretty good. lots of inside the cockpit photos on the web





https://www.criticalpast.com/video/6...rcrafts-rudder
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2022, 07:37 PM
 
17,536 posts, read 13,324,825 times
Reputation: 32981
Quote:
Originally Posted by TamaraSavannah View Post
It is rather interesting to see where one's focus is. Been thru the first page.....and no mention of what the B 17 was called and for those of us in such worlds, that is what we lock in on.

The Wings over Dallas website was down and dark until tonight, just went live. First time I saw the names



B-17 “Texas Raidersâ€

P-63 Kingcobra
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2022, 06:20 AM
 
8,377 posts, read 4,359,448 times
Reputation: 11880
Looked like the B 17 was flying straight and level, not more than a couple hundred feet above the ground.


The P 63 came in fast from behind and above, about a 45 degree bank to port, and hit the B 17 high on the port side at the junction of the wing and fuselage.


The P 63 all but exploded on impact, there didn't appear to be any significant size pieces on impact that appeared to be more than shrapnel.


The tail of the B 17 was sheared off with flame obvious at the rear of the now tailless air plane.


The front of the B 17 went into an immediate, uncontrollable dive into the ground where it exploded into a fire ball.


The time from initial collision to impact with the ground, about 4 seconds.


To me it looked like the P 63 was attempting to fly by or over the B 17 and either misjudged or had a mechanical failure they could not correct for.



The B 17 never saw it coming. Short of the pilots maybe having a instinctive reaction to pull back on the yoke when the plane went nose down, it was over with barely any time to utter even a 'Oh crap'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2022, 06:25 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,861 posts, read 33,523,515 times
Reputation: 30763
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchoc View Post
https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/lo...b-961874c52bea




So very sad and gut wrenching. Several videos from different angles.

How tragic, especially for the little kids that saw it happen.


Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
It looks like a terrible accident. The bottom of the smaller plane was above the B-17 so it's entirely possible the pilot couldn't see the bomber...in a blind spot. It's also possible the smaller plane's pilot misjudged his turn radius.

Maybe the sun got in the smaller planes eyes? That was my original thought watching the video
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2022, 06:27 AM
 
15,398 posts, read 7,464,179 times
Reputation: 19333
I think one of the issues with the warbird displays is that they don't have the resources to plan like the Blue Angels or the Thunderbirds do. The military display teams plan their shows to use optical illusion to make them look more spectacular than they really are. When viewed from the ground, the planes look very close together, but from a different angle they are not as close as you would think. When the planes are actually close, they are not doing any complex moves. The military pilots also fly in formation a lot more than the warbird pilots. That's why the FAA introduced training requirements for airshow formation flight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2022, 09:38 AM
 
43,620 posts, read 44,346,965 times
Reputation: 20541
The victims' names have been published:
https://www.opb.org/article/2022/11/...2012%2C%202022.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2022, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,656 posts, read 13,964,967 times
Reputation: 18855
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
I think one of the issues with the warbird displays is that they don't have the resources to plan like the Blue Angels or the Thunderbirds do. The military display teams plan their shows to use optical illusion to make them look more spectacular than they really are. When viewed from the ground, the planes look very close together, but from a different angle they are not as close as you would think. When the planes are actually close, they are not doing any complex moves. The military pilots also fly in formation a lot more than the warbird pilots. That's why the FAA introduced training requirements for airshow formation flight.

Oh, like at Ramstein AFB in 1988? Remember it well for I was traveling that night and flew, as a passenger, with a responding burn team.



Now, maybe things have changed a lot since then.....but let's not give the illusion that the military is immune to such. From the XB-70#2 to 1982 Thunderbirds Diamond Crash, that should be proof enough of how hazardous this is. Further, keep in mind that military budgets are flexible and the money going to who sees which task is more important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2022, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,656 posts, read 13,964,967 times
Reputation: 18855
This has shown up in one of my veteran sources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sceufd1Xutc
(haven't reviewed it yet)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top