Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So George Karl is a comedian or he just got out coached and players out played?
You proved you nothing about basketball because George Karl's team didn't 4 in a row, they lose 3 in a row in a 5 game series. So there is no connection
You proved you nothing about basketball because George Karl's team didn't 4 in a row, they lose 3 in a row in a 5 game series. So there is no connection
dude are you serious? i know nothing about basket ball yet you think the 2005 and 2007 nba playoff 1st rounds where best of 5? the nba changed to best of 7 in the 1st round after the 2002 season. the spurs beat the nuggets in 2005, 4-1 after losing the 1st game at home, and then again in 2007 after losing the 1st game at home. also george karl was the coach of the bucks when the 1st round was best of 5.
come on man i know you can do better.
wait arent you the guy who said the 76ers would win 3 games against any of the top teams in the east? your basketball knowledge is lacking, never mind.
on a side note, the spurs lost game 1 of the 2003 1st round to the suns at home as well.
notice any sort of pattern going on here? yes, 2003, 05, 07 the spurs all lost the 1st game at home and went on to win titles.
Do you know how many times a team that was down 0-2 went home and tied the series 2-2????????????????
As endearing as your condescension was, it doesn't add anything to your argument.
Teams that go down 0-2 and tie the series up at 2-2 are generally relatively evenly matched. In this case, it's my contention that the Pacers aren't on that level. Do they take 1 game at home? Yeah, maybe. But if you think Indy is going to tie up this series 2-2, I don't think we're watching the same game.
There was nothing from Game 1 that lead me to believe that this will be an evenly-matched series.
As endearing as your condescension was, it doesn't add anything to your argument.
Teams that go down 0-2 and tie the series up at 2-2 are generally relatively evenly matched. In this case, it's my contention that the Pacers aren't on that level. Do they take 1 game at home? Yeah, maybe. But if you think Indy is going to tie up this series 2-2, I don't think we're watching the same game.
There was nothing from Game 1 that lead me to believe that this will be an evenly-matched series.
The Pacers showed they are good enough to protect their home court. So like I said the series will be tied at 2-2 and after that Game 5 will be crucial
dude are you serious? I know nothing about basket ball yet you think the 2005 and 2007 nba playoff 1st rounds where best of 5? The nba changed to best of 7 in the 1st round after the 2002 season. The spurs beat the nuggets in 2005, 4-1 after losing the 1st game at home, and then again in 2007 after losing the 1st game at home. Also george karl was the coach of the bucks when the 1st round was best of 5.
Come on man i know you can do better.
Wait arent you the guy who said the 76ers would win 3 games against any of the top teams in the east? Your basketball knowledge is lacking, never mind.
On a side note, the spurs lost game 1 of the 2003 1st round to the suns at home as well.
Notice any sort of pattern going on here? Yes, 2003, 05, 07 the spurs all lost the 1st game at home and went on to win titles.
george karl was the coach of the sonics when they lost in 1994, ok????
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.