U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alabama > Birmingham area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2021, 05:10 PM
 
1,386 posts, read 989,918 times
Reputation: 615

Advertisements

Lo-freaking-L, they tried their Damnedest to pass the bill before October and now that it’s October, they are gonna wait to complete by November…. Wild
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2021, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Madison, Alabama
10,879 posts, read 6,958,708 times
Reputation: 7464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surge0001 View Post
Lo-freaking-L, they tried their Damnedest to pass the bill before October and now that it’s October, they are gonna wait to complete by November…. Wild
As long as the two bills remain tied together the Infrastructure Bill may never pass.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 10:35 PM
 
281 posts, read 353,820 times
Reputation: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mississippi Alabama Line View Post
Not sure what that has to do with anything.

We are talking about Birmingham traffic, and it is ALWAYS worse in the city limits, than it is OTM. Reworking the interchanges recently (as part of the bridge replacement) helped, but it's more constricted there, more choke points, more interchanges. There's more lanes OTM too. This is true for any city, really.

That's why I asked if you'd ever been there. Anyone with a working knowledge of the area knows this, but you makes these statements like they are fact.

What do I know? I only lived there for years.
All I know is that 280 from the foot of Oak Mountain to 31 is one gigantic choke point. Aside from limiting intersections and maybe introducing folks in that area to the joys (sic) of the Michigan Left, there's not much to be done.

As for the Northern Beltline....I suspect that's something my great-great grandchildren will get to roll along during their adult lives.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2021, 09:23 AM
 
3,228 posts, read 3,433,403 times
Reputation: 4403
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Williams View Post
All I know is that 280 from the foot of Oak Mountain to 31 is one gigantic choke point. Aside from limiting intersections and maybe introducing folks in that area to the joys (sic) of the Michigan Left, there's not much to be done.

As for the Northern Beltline....I suspect that's something my great-great grandchildren will get to roll along during their adult lives.
I think 280 should be turned into a semi-limited access road (similar to how 280 is between 31 and 459) and from 119 to Chelsea now while they still can. Not so much due to heavy traffic volume, but because of the terrain. Specifically, I am talking about the intersections with Shelby County 41 and Shelby County 43. It is incredibly frustrating from not just a time perspective, but also from a gas usage and brake usage, to have dozens of cars stop in both directions when they are travelling 60+ mph and have momentum from gravity just so 1 or 2 cars can cross or turn on to 280.

I think it would make a big difference and 20 years from now, people will be glad it was done much like residents of Homewood, Vestavia, and Mountain Brook appreciate that 280 in their neck of the woods generally flows much smoother than it does from The Summit to Greystone.

I think there are a few places through Inverness where service roads could be extended alongside 280 to where there are fewer intersections and lights but the businesses along 280 would probably balk at limiting access.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2021, 07:40 AM
 
Location: North of Birmingham, AL
817 posts, read 697,370 times
Reputation: 1070
I'm curious about how Memphis got the I-269 outer loop built so quickly, when it is arguably even farther out and passing through even more undeveloped areas than the proposed I-422 (and much longer). Maybe because eventually parts of it will be designated I-69 or it was deemed essential to that project?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2021, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Madison, Alabama
10,879 posts, read 6,958,708 times
Reputation: 7464
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaDave View Post
I'm curious about how Memphis got the I-269 outer loop built so quickly, when it is arguably even farther out and passing through even more undeveloped areas than the proposed I-422 (and much longer). Maybe because eventually parts of it will be designated I-69 or it was deemed essential to that project?
Can't answer your question, but I have one: Did Mississippi pay for that southern Memphis loop, or did Tennessee? It's essentially all in Mississippi, so I assume it was an MDOT project.

It's pretty much out in the middle of nowhere like the one that's now halfway around Nashville.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2021, 09:22 PM
 
3,228 posts, read 3,433,403 times
Reputation: 4403
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaDave View Post
I'm curious about how Memphis got the I-269 outer loop built so quickly, when it is arguably even farther out and passing through even more undeveloped areas than the proposed I-422 (and much longer). Maybe because eventually parts of it will be designated I-69 or it was deemed essential to that project?
The costs were split between the two states. The TN portion was paid for by TN, the MS portion by MS.

The total cost combined was something like $1.2 billion, so less than a quarter of what the northern beltline would cost.

The terrain for the route of 422 is what makes it so expensive. If it were flat land, then it would probably already have been built for like $1 billion.

It greatly improved access to the casinos in Tunica from places like Birmingham and Atlanta. That may have had some impact on Mississippi wanting to get it done.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2021, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Madison, AL
573 posts, read 574,070 times
Reputation: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveklein View Post
The terrain for the route of 422 is what makes it so expensive. If it were flat land, then it would probably already have been built for like $1 billion.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner! Just look at a topographic map of Jefferson County and a topographic map of SW Tennessee and NW Mississippi.

The Memphis area is a lot flatter than the Birmingham area. After all, Memphis is in a river valley and Birmingham is right at the southern end of the Appalachian Mountains.

Mountains make for beautiful scenery, but difficult and expensive road building. Just ask West Virginia.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2021, 06:23 PM
 
Location: North of Birmingham, AL
817 posts, read 697,370 times
Reputation: 1070
Makes sense on the terrain issues!
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2021, 03:01 PM
 
10,246 posts, read 6,073,869 times
Reputation: 31450
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveklein View Post
The costs were split between the two states. The TN portion was paid for by TN, the MS portion by MS.

The total cost combined was something like $1.2 billion, so less than a quarter of what the northern beltline would cost.

The terrain for the route of 422 is what makes it so expensive. If it were flat land, then it would probably already have been built for like $1 billion.

It greatly improved access to the casinos in Tunica from places like Birmingham and Atlanta. That may have had some impact on Mississippi wanting to get it done.

Yep. All one has to do is look at the terrain of I-22 between Jasper and I-65 to see why it took so long. And then look at a topographic map of northern Jefferson County. On the other hand, Birmingham metro will really need the distribution space in the decades to come.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alabama > Birmingham area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 AM.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top