U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2012, 06:41 AM
 
Location: Montreal -> CT -> MA -> Montreal -> Ottawa
17,330 posts, read 32,290,217 times
Reputation: 28890

Advertisements

I do.

As much as I didn't want a Kindle, that's as much as I love it now. It's so much lighter than a hardcover book. It's great that I can borrow Kindle books from the library, without the expense of buying them and the hassle of leaving the house to go get them. It's so much more comfortable to read in bed -- I can even lie on my side since there's no "other side" of the book on the Kindle to get squished by the pillows.

I still don't read *all* my books on the Kindle -- there are many that I still buy used from Amazon resellers -- so I have a pretty good mix of both.

And because I have such a good mix of both, I've discovered something: I seem to get through a book quicker on the Kindle than when I'm reading paper.

I don't know if it's because it's so much less cumbersome, which makes me want to read more. I don't know if it's because every "page" is shorter, so "just a few more pages" doesn't take a long time, no matter how many times I say "just a few more pages and then I'll go to sleep." I don't know if the easy page-turning saves *that* much time. I don't know if it's because I don't (can't) leaf through the pages, just for the heck of it. I don't know if it's because I don't go back -- although I could -- to re-read something. I don't know exactly why, but I find that books get read quicker on my Kindle than if I'm reading a paper book.

Have you found that to be the case for you, too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-01-2012, 02:04 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
10,122 posts, read 17,311,135 times
Reputation: 13758
Yep, I'm reading more than ever with my Kindle.

But I've gone almost entirely with Kindle. I have a hardcover I won for free on Goodreads and I keep wishing I had it on Kindle instead!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Montreal -> CT -> MA -> Montreal -> Ottawa
17,330 posts, read 32,290,217 times
Reputation: 28890
Quote:
Originally Posted by PA2UK View Post
Yep, I'm reading more than ever with my Kindle.

But I've gone almost entirely with Kindle. I have a hardcover I won for free on Goodreads and I keep wishing I had it on Kindle instead!
Yeah, I can understand that, especially because of the weight of a hardcover.

It's really funny, though, how much quicker I read on the Kindle. After the first few books that I zipped through on the Kindle, I panicked, thinking "Oh my gosh, am I reading CONDENSED versions of these books???" But, no, I wasn't. It's so interesting...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 03:27 PM
 
16,327 posts, read 11,145,432 times
Reputation: 68805
I resisted the Kindle too but am a happy convert Like you, I still read paper books but most of my book reading is on the Kindle now. The weight is ideal - even with a flip cover. Bed reading is the best for the reason you mentioned and also reading while on my back and using my tummy as the table when the cover is flipped open easel-style.

I'd say I go through more books with the Kindle but not necessarily much faster than a real book. My reading style is different, though. With a real book, I always read to natural stopping places - a break within a chapter or the end of a chapter, for example. I tend to read for longer per session with a real book than with Kindle. With the Kindle I'll read whatever I can while I'm out and stop when I need to because it's my appointment time or whatever. So, I'll read more short bursts on the Kindle in addition to hunkering down at home for longer when I feel like it. I think that's why I finish more books with Kindle - but the overall time it takes to read each book seems equivalent to real books - it's just that the hours are broken up differently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Montreal -> CT -> MA -> Montreal -> Ottawa
17,330 posts, read 32,290,217 times
Reputation: 28890
Quote:
Originally Posted by toosie View Post
I resisted the Kindle too but am a happy convert Like you, I still read paper books but most of my book reading is on the Kindle now. The weight is ideal - even with a flip cover. Bed reading is the best for the reason you mentioned and also reading while on my back and using my tummy as the table when the cover is flipped open easel-style.

I'd say I go through more books with the Kindle but not necessarily much faster than a real book. My reading style is different, though. With a real book, I always read to natural stopping places - a break within a chapter or the end of a chapter, for example. I tend to read for longer per session with a real book than with Kindle. With the Kindle I'll read whatever I can while I'm out and stop when I need to because it's my appointment time or whatever. So, I'll read more short bursts on the Kindle in addition to hunkering down at home for longer when I feel like it. I think that's why I finish more books with Kindle - but the overall time it takes to read each book seems equivalent to real books - it's just that the hours are broken up differently.
Ha! So my theory is getting holes poked into it.

I also stop at natural breaks but somehow, somehow, the book seems to end quicker on a Kindle. Maybe it's just my imagination, though. Or maybe I actually just enjoy it more. I don't know.

Call me stumped. (Just don't call me Stumpy, I know that I'm short.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 03:34 PM
 
Location: California Mountains
1,448 posts, read 2,992,033 times
Reputation: 2356
I don't have an e-reader, but I have read thousands of e-books on the computer. For me, the reading goes much faster with a monitor than with a physical book. I normally read four or five e-books versus three physical books each week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Montreal -> CT -> MA -> Montreal -> Ottawa
17,330 posts, read 32,290,217 times
Reputation: 28890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ol' Wanderer View Post
I don't have an e-reader, but I have read thousands of e-books on the computer. For me, the reading goes much faster with a monitor than with a physical book. I normally read four or five e-books versus three physical books each week.
Okay! The theory is rebuilding itself! Interesting...!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 06:28 PM
 
1,833 posts, read 3,259,428 times
Reputation: 1795
I read faster on the Kindle app on the iPad. Sometimes I wish I had a Kindle though since the iPad gets heavy if I'm holding it in my hands when reading.

I still read regular books too. I find that I can only read a couple at a time on the iPad before I want to be holding a book and physically turning the pages. I'm perfectly content having both options available to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2012, 10:44 PM
 
Location: Ohio
1,561 posts, read 2,199,617 times
Reputation: 2498
Yes I do. Glad you made this thread because I wasn't sure if it was just me. But yeah, with the Kindle, I get through books much, much quicker than I did with regular books.

I love my kindle, even got a light for it for reading at night
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2012, 04:49 AM
 
Location: Montreal -> CT -> MA -> Montreal -> Ottawa
17,330 posts, read 32,290,217 times
Reputation: 28890
Quote:
Originally Posted by fromupthere View Post
I read faster on the Kindle app on the iPad. Sometimes I wish I had a Kindle though since the iPad gets heavy if I'm holding it in my hands when reading.

I still read regular books too. I find that I can only read a couple at a time on the iPad before I want to be holding a book and physically turning the pages. I'm perfectly content having both options available to me.
I swing both ways, too... so to speak. I do like my paper sometimes, but I guess because the Kindle isn't heavy like an iPad, I don't have that issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gobucks86 View Post
Yes I do. Glad you made this thread because I wasn't sure if it was just me. But yeah, with the Kindle, I get through books much, much quicker than I did with regular books.

I love my kindle, even got a light for it for reading at night
It's really a funny phenomena, isn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top