Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2016, 05:13 AM
 
Location: Born in L.A. - NYC is Second Home - Rustbelt is Home Base
1,607 posts, read 1,085,244 times
Reputation: 1372

Advertisements

Is OK to use the name of a famous Beatles song for the title of my book? Or is there a copyright problem? The book has nothing to do with the song or the Beatles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2016, 05:53 AM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,810,680 times
Reputation: 40166
Song titles cannot be copyrighted.

However, phrases - including titles of various works - can be trademarked.

It really depends on the title and its use. For example 'Yellow Submarine' is trademarked. 'Yesterday' is not.

I recommend the following source of information as a start:
Are Song Titles & Lyrics Protected by Copyright or Trademark Law? | TheLaw.com

And here is the United States Patent and Trademark Office, where you can search trademarked phrases:
Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 05:54 AM
 
Location: Richmond VA
6,885 posts, read 7,887,329 times
Reputation: 18214
Book titles aren't copyrighted either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2016, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Born in L.A. - NYC is Second Home - Rustbelt is Home Base
1,607 posts, read 1,085,244 times
Reputation: 1372
Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2016, 11:04 AM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,520,027 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
Song titles cannot be copyrighted.

However, phrases - including titles of various works - can be trademarked.

It really depends on the title and its use. For example 'Yellow Submarine' is trademarked. 'Yesterday' is not.

I recommend the following source of information as a start:
Are Song Titles & Lyrics Protected by Copyright or Trademark Law? | TheLaw.com

And here is the United States Patent and Trademark Office, where you can search trademarked phrases:
Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stagemomma View Post
Book titles aren't copyrighted either.
That's a bit of an overstatement. The prototype of a title subject to copyright would be Ezra Pound's "In a Station of the Metro," a poem whose title is it's first line. Here is the test:

"To be protected by copyright, a work must contain a certain minimum
amount of authorship in the form of original literary, musical, pictorial, or
graphic expression."

Titles can meet that test, but often they do not.

Of course, even where a title is subject to copyright, fair use carves out some room to use it. Fair use does not appear to apply in the OP. The question is, what is the song title? Yesterday is certainly no problem, but Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band? It might be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2016, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Summit, NJ
1,878 posts, read 2,026,945 times
Reputation: 2482
One of the biggest selling books a few years ago was called "Born to Run," and had nothing to do with the song.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2016, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Maine
22,921 posts, read 28,263,704 times
Reputation: 31234
Quote:
Originally Posted by averysgore View Post
One of the biggest selling books a few years ago was called "Born to Run," and had nothing to do with the song.
True. But "Born to Run" was a phrase long before Springsteen used it.

MOONLIGHT MILE is another example. Pretty good book. GREAT song by the Stones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2016, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,810,680 times
Reputation: 40166
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCityTheBridge View Post
That's a bit of an overstatement. The prototype of a title subject to copyright would be Ezra Pound's "In a Station of the Metro," a poem whose title is it's first line. Here is the test:

"To be protected by copyright, a work must contain a certain minimum
amount of authorship in the form of original literary, musical, pictorial, or
graphic expression."

Titles can meet that test, but often they do not.

Of course, even where a title is subject to copyright, fair use carves out some room to use it. Fair use does not appear to apply in the OP. The question is, what is the song title? Yesterday is certainly no problem, but Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band? It might be.
The Beatles song Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band is, as I pointed out before, not copyrighted. As a title, it cannot be. That is copyright law.

However - again, as I previously pointed out - while titles cannot be copyrighted, they can be trademarked if they are sufficiently original. Yesterday? Not a chance. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band? I would be very surprised if whatever agency currently owns that song does not also possess trademark protection for it.

And, no, it doesn't matter if the title is repeated in the work. Lyrics, for example, have copyright protection automatically conveyed upon their creation. Yet that doesn't make the pulled-from-the-lyrics title copyrighted. Think about it - the vast majority of popular music songs take their titles from their lyrics. The odd song that doesn't, such as Bohemian Rhapsody - is the unusual exception.

Titles cannot be copyrighted. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2016, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Aloverton
6,560 posts, read 14,457,035 times
Reputation: 10165
One of my clients did it, twice--he's a music junkie and makes it a theme in all his stuff--and hasn't gotten any flak yet for either book. And both have sold well enough that, from a legal standpoint, there's something to go after.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2016, 03:20 PM
 
9,238 posts, read 22,894,483 times
Reputation: 22699
Whether or not it's required, it would still be "good form" to at least acknowledge the origin of the title in the Foreword or Acknowledgments section.


For example, Wally Lamb wrote She's Come Undone and politely acknowledged the song by The Guess Who, even though The Guess Who spelled it "Undun." But then he wrote I Know This Much Is True, and he did not acknowledge the band Spandau Ballet. People like me got a little irked at that. Not a big deal, and not illegal, but just the decent thing to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top