Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts > Boston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: what do you think about smoking bans in Boston
greatest thing they ever did 46 70.77%
maybe in family oriented venues but not everywhere 10 15.38%
we should ban smoking bans altogether no matter what the venue 13 20.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2010, 11:44 AM
 
Location: lost in the USA
113 posts, read 108,830 times
Reputation: 61

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
And even though bars and restaurants seem like private areas to you, because they aren't private membership clubs and instead open to the general public for business... they are indeed public areas.

But... if you want to move out to a rural area like Montana, go smoke all the cigarettes you want to. But Montana being so much less populated than the rest of the US is why they they had no speeding limits on their highways for many decades.
While I couldnt find anything that gave a definite yes or no, The link provided below shows that local governments are allowed to ban smoking in private clubs in MA

EXEMPTIONS FROM SMOKING BANS FOR PRIVATE CLUBS

I wish I could move to montana and smoke all I want but unfortunantly, they also have a smoking ban

List of smoking bans in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2010, 08:48 AM
miu
 
Location: MA/NH
17,769 posts, read 40,163,673 times
Reputation: 18095
I also think that I have a personal right to be able to go to restaurant, pub or bar and NOT come home with my hair and clothing reeking of YOUR cigarette smoke. Just because it doesn't bother you because you've trashed your sense of smell, doesn't mean that I have to suffer for it.

And as someone who has a two-family house, I certainly have the personal right to a preference to never rent to a smoker. Your cigarette smoke imbeds itself into drywall and woodwork and yellows the paint. Cigarette smoking is a nasty activity. There is nothing cool or glamourous about it. The activity doesn't enhance anyone's life except those in the tobacco industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2010, 09:45 AM
 
7,235 posts, read 7,037,189 times
Reputation: 12265
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
I also think that I have a personal right to be able to go to restaurant, pub or bar and NOT come home with my hair and clothing reeking of YOUR cigarette smoke.
I'm not sure what you think a "personal right" is, but you have a legal right to a smoke-free bar/restaurant in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. There's no debate about this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
The activity doesn't enhance anyone's life except those in the tobacco industry.
And people who enjoy smoking. Nonsmokers don't seem to understand this--it's not just a dirty addiction people are trying to shake nor is it something adults do to be "cool". I enjoy a few cigarettes a week. As in, I truly enjoy them. I enjoy the smoke, the nicotine, the taste, everything. Shrug.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2010, 12:00 PM
 
14 posts, read 30,112 times
Reputation: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
I also think that I have a personal right to be able to go to restaurant, pub or bar and NOT come home with my hair and clothing reeking of YOUR cigarette smoke. Just because it doesn't bother you because you've trashed your sense of smell, doesn't mean that I have to suffer for it.
This is sort of the framework for thinking about this: our rights extend as far as they don't infringe on other's rights--with all sorts of caveats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2010, 06:26 PM
 
4 posts, read 2,374 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
I also think that I have a personal right to be able to go to restaurant, pub or bar and NOT come home with my hair and clothing reeking of YOUR cigarette smoke. Just because it doesn't bother you because you've trashed your sense of smell, doesn't mean that I have to suffer for it.
.

I dont think anyone on here is disagreeing with this statement. If you are going to rent an apartment to somone and dont want them smoking in it, than that is your right to put that in the rental agreement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 04:48 AM
 
13 posts, read 20,040 times
Reputation: 20
They should ban McDonalds, KFC, Burger King etc, cause you people are all getting too fat, is that what you call healthy?? I'm a smoker, a little less than a pack a day, 55 yrs old and I bet I'm in better shape than most of the anti-smokers there.Booze is another killer but we don't vote that out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 08:02 AM
 
3,755 posts, read 4,800,357 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlchase View Post
They should ban McDonalds, KFC, Burger King etc, cause you people are all getting too fat, is that what you call healthy?? I'm a smoker, a little less than a pack a day, 55 yrs old and I bet I'm in better shape than most of the anti-smokers there.Booze is another killer but we don't vote that out
People make a choice to go an eat at fast food restaurants. So banning them would send a very bad message to private businesses that the government can control them. You ban booze and the government will lose out on a ton of revenue as well as restaurants and bars. Don't see that happening.

Personally, a bar and/or restaurant should have the right to allow smoking if they wish. They will have to deal with any customer backlash that could occur from those heavily opposed to smoking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 08:43 AM
 
Location: a bar
2,722 posts, read 6,111,377 times
Reputation: 2978
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlchase View Post
They should ban McDonalds, KFC, Burger King etc, cause you people are all getting too fat, is that what you call healthy?? I'm a smoker, a little less than a pack a day, 55 yrs old and I bet I'm in better shape than most of the anti-smokers there.Booze is another killer but we don't vote that out
As mentioned several times throughout this 2 year old thread, the smoking ban was introduced to protect the health and well being of the bar employees, not the patrons.

To my knowledge serving greasy fast food and Jack and Cokes isn't a health risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,841 posts, read 22,014,769 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlchase View Post
They should ban McDonalds, KFC, Burger King etc, cause you people are all getting too fat, is that what you call healthy?? I'm a smoker, a little less than a pack a day, 55 yrs old and I bet I'm in better shape than most of the anti-smokers there.Booze is another killer but we don't vote that out
Ridiculous argument. No one voted cigarettes out. You can still buy cigarettes just like you can still by booze or a Big Mac.

The difference is that when I eat a Big Mac in public (which, btw, I never do... don't touch the stuff), the people around me aren't getting second-hand calories, sodium, cholesterol, fat, etc. It's not a health threat to anyone else. I think we can all agree that smoking is harmful to not only the smoker, but people in the vicinity who are at risk just by the very act of taking a breath.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2012, 09:10 AM
 
594 posts, read 1,634,184 times
Reputation: 332
Even when I was a smoker I didn't mind the smoking ban. If you're in a restaurant and can't wait until you finish your meal to smoke a cigarette, then you have problems. Real problems.

Also, as far as bars and clubs go, I worked for a long time in Boston as a DJ so at first I thought it was going to kill me, as I'd usually go through at least 3/4 a pack during a shift at a club, but after the first couple of weeks I realized that it was definitely worth the trade off of not being able to smoke in order to work in a smoke-free environment. I eventually realized that I'm only here for about 3 or 4 hours anyway, so it's not like it's the end of the world if I can't smoke for that long.

One of the best things that the city ever did, in my opinion, even if I was skeptical about it at the beginning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts > Boston

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top