Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts > Boston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2016, 01:40 PM
 
1,203 posts, read 1,812,308 times
Reputation: 1205

Advertisements

I'd say $100k minimum. If you have things like student loans, credit card debt, etc, you'd need more IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2016, 03:22 PM
 
Location: East Coast
4,249 posts, read 3,720,970 times
Reputation: 6482
A year or two ago, Bill Maher cited a study regarding how much it took for a family (I believe of 4) to have what is generally considered a "middle class" lifestyle, which was a decent house in a safe neighborhood, 2 decent (not luxury) cars, a non-luxury vacation each year, etc - a nice lifestyle but not extravagant. It was just over $100K. So, if you're looking at a higher cost area like DC, NYC, Boston, Chicago, etc., (even though Chicago is a bit less expensive than Boston), I'd say you have to up that slightly.

But of course, there is so much tinkering -- maybe the family wants to be in or very close to the city, which is more expensive, but maybe that means they need only one, or even zero cars. Maybe they can work from anywhere, or own their own business, or do something remotely, and don't need or ever want to go into the city, so they can live very far out. Maybe they hate being outside, so they would never go to the beach for a vacation. Maybe they never want to go on vacation. Or maybe they love outside, so their ideal vacation is camping in a tent. Some people are very handy and can do basic electrical and plumbing repairs/additions themselves. Some people need to call in professionals for a light bulb change. That's also going to factor in.

The biggest driver is housing, so very much rides on that. If they have help with a down payment, or inherit their parents' house, or their grandparents' house, it would take a lot less. If they have no outside help, don't have a job with any bonuses, and have always needed to come up with every penny of housing expenses themselves, it would take a lot more.

I'd guess, on average, you'd probably need about $125K. More would be better (as always).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2016, 04:04 PM
 
161 posts, read 214,259 times
Reputation: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruins_Fan View Post
I'd say $100k minimum. If you have things like student loans, credit card debt, etc, you'd need more IMO.
Thank you for your input.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dm84 View Post
I think a family of 4 pulling in less than $100k around here is in a precarious position. That said, I do realize many if not most families in this area do pull in less than that.
Thanks for your input. Based on what I know about my family members there I can see how too much below that can result in a lot of tightening that financial belt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2016, 04:09 PM
 
161 posts, read 214,259 times
Reputation: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagoliz View Post
A year or two ago, Bill Maher cited a study regarding how much it took for a family (I believe of 4) to have what is generally considered a "middle class" lifestyle, which was a decent house in a safe neighborhood, 2 decent (not luxury) cars, a non-luxury vacation each year, etc - a nice lifestyle but not extravagant. It was just over $100K. So, if you're looking at a higher cost area like DC, NYC, Boston, Chicago, etc., (even though Chicago is a bit less expensive than Boston), I'd say you have to up that slightly.

But of course, there is so much tinkering -- maybe the family wants to be in or very close to the city, which is more expensive, but maybe that means they need only one, or even zero cars. Maybe they can work from anywhere, or own their own business, or do something remotely, and don't need or ever want to go into the city, so they can live very far out. Maybe they hate being outside, so they would never go to the beach for a vacation. Maybe they never want to go on vacation. Or maybe they love outside, so their ideal vacation is camping in a tent. Some people are very handy and can do basic electrical and plumbing repairs/additions themselves. Some people need to call in professionals for a light bulb change. That's also going to factor in.

The biggest driver is housing, so very much rides on that. If they have help with a down payment, or inherit their parents' house, or their grandparents' house, it would take a lot less. If they have no outside help, don't have a job with any bonuses, and have always needed to come up with every penny of housing expenses themselves, it would take a lot more.

I'd guess, on average, you'd probably need about $125K. More would be better (as always).


Thanks for your best guess on income requirements. I agree with all you said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2016, 02:20 AM
 
5,788 posts, read 5,102,477 times
Reputation: 8003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surf123 View Post
Thanks for your best guess on income requirements. I agree with all you said.
I'd say 150K just to get by decently. To be comfortable, I think you need at least 180K if you have 2 kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2016, 06:50 AM
 
Location: North of Boston
560 posts, read 751,311 times
Reputation: 656
living in an "average" town i would say $100k is comfortable assuming you bought the house 6+ years ago for a less outrageous price.

if you are buying now, $150K.

note this is "living comfortable" which is a higher standard (and subjective) than getting by which can be and is done on substantially less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2016, 11:15 AM
 
Location: North of Boston
3,686 posts, read 7,425,013 times
Reputation: 3663
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Well a lot of households and families earn A LOT less in the Boston area and would think they're on easy street and living large if they made 80k.

The median family income for most Eastern MA towns (say, inside 495) is over $100,000. It is true there are many families making less than $80K per year, but most families do, in fact, make more than $80K in the Boston area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2016, 11:21 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,937 posts, read 36,943,649 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by gf2020 View Post
The median family income for most Eastern MA towns (say, inside 495) is over $100,000. It is true there are many families making less than $80K per year, but most families do, in fact, make more than $80K in the Boston area.
I'm surprised by that. Quite a jump. According to the census bureau the median household income for the Boston Metro Area in 2013 was under 75k ($72,907).

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/pres.../cb14-r13.html

Where is it shown that is over 100k? I've generally not seen data on families, but on households, which is a bit different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2016, 11:21 AM
 
Location: New England
2,190 posts, read 2,231,420 times
Reputation: 1969
Quote:
Originally Posted by gf2020 View Post
The median family income for most Eastern MA towns (say, inside 495) is over $100,000. It is true there are many families making less than $80K per year, but most families do, in fact, make more than $80K in the Boston area.
Yes the per capita income the Middlesex county is 43k. That means for a family of four the average income would be 172k. For Essex county the average is 35k and for Norfolk the average is 45k. The suburbs of Boston is one of the wealthiest regions in the country, that's why it is so expensive to live here.

I think per capita income is better than looking at the average household income. Families in kids often have two parents in their prime working years therefore they make more than the statistics for the average household. The average household includes people living by themselves and retirees. While looking at per capita income might overestimate the averages slightly I think it is still a good estimate on what the average four person family makes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2016, 11:24 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,937 posts, read 36,943,649 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysmith95 View Post
Yes the per capita income the Middlesex county is 43k. That means for a family of four the average income would be 172k. For Essex county the average is 35k and for Norfolk the average is 45k. The suburbs of Boston is one of the wealthiest regions in the country, that's why it is so expensive to live here.
No, it doesn't mean that at all. Not even close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts > Boston

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top