Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Buffalo area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2009, 07:14 PM
 
451 posts, read 692,458 times
Reputation: 148

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasRocks View Post
It's all about that Buffalo CAN NOT sell luxury boxes at the prices
big market cities can, Buffalo is a small market and shrinking
and the Ralph is like the 2nd oldest stadium in league.

Correct. Luxury boxes and corporate support are what keeps teams viable.

There is not enough corporate support in Buffalo to keep that team there, which is why they are reaching out towards even Rochester.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2009, 07:16 PM
 
451 posts, read 692,458 times
Reputation: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by jblake78728 View Post
You do realize Bloomington & St Paul are suburbs of Minneapolis, right? Its not like they are 150 miles apart.

If you are trying to say St Paul is hockeytown but Bloomington (and Minneapolis) couldn't care less it really doesn't help the whole argument you are trying to make.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, okay, seriously. St. Paul is NOT a suburb of Minneapolis. Wow. You should just give up right there.


per MNS wikipedia:

"As is well explained in a 1993 Sports Illustrated article,[9] owner Norman Green was much reviled in Minnesota following the decision (due to poor attendance during a string of losing seasons, the failure to reach stadium deals in Minneapolis or Saint Paul, and a sexual harassment lawsuit against Green that resulted in his wife threatening to leave him unless he moved the team) to move the franchise. The Sports Illustrated article included a quote from North Stars booster club president Julie Hammond: "When [Norm Green] came here, he said, 'Only an idiot could lose money on hockey in Minnesota.' Well, I guess he proved that point."

How convenient of you to leave those two pieces out.

Bloomington is where the current Mall of America is today, and the very land it sits on is where the Met Center used to be.

The Met Center, despite it being a favorite for players and fans, needed to be replaced, thus Green looking but coming up short in the Twin Cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2009, 07:23 PM
 
92,186 posts, read 122,439,279 times
Reputation: 18172
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS085 View Post
Correct. Luxury boxes and corporate support are what keeps teams viable.

There is not enough corporate support in Buffalo to keep that team there, which is why they are reaching out towards even Rochester.
Actually, the Bills has support in area close by in PA, the Syracuse area, the Southern Tier and into Southern Ontario.

Also, if take the area it's fan base covers, I think they will be fine.

As for the Sabres, you still can't knock the fan support for them either. It would be different if Canada was further away, but to be honest, it is adjacent to the area and should be counted anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2009, 07:31 PM
 
451 posts, read 692,458 times
Reputation: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post
Actually, the Bills has support in area close by in PA, the Syracuse area, the Southern Tier and into Southern Ontario.

Also, if take the area it's fan base covers, I think they will be fine.

Bills May Relocate after Bills Toronto Series: Ralph Wilson Seeks Financial Stability in Modern Football Economy | Suite101.com

In its NFL Team Valuations, Forbes.com noted that “over the past few seasons the team's small market and antiquated stadium have placed the Bills in the bottom third of revenue of the NFL.” Meanwhile, Canada's largest city and financial capital will have a big time chance to prove it is a more than capable adoptive home for this financial prodigal son of Mr. Wilson.

Sadly, the modern football economy has usurped the heart of the game. Buffalonians can sell out every game from here to the end of football eternity, but it’s the corporate sponsors that put down the money for the luxury boxes that keep teams viable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 05:52 PM
 
70 posts, read 178,538 times
Reputation: 55
They won't leave...period
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Hamburg, NY
1,350 posts, read 3,530,952 times
Reputation: 1044
Looks like LA got the go ahead for a new stadium ..........

Quote:
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Thursday he had signed a bill allowing the construction of a 75,000-seat stadium that developers hope will lure an NFL team back to the Los Angeles area.
Quote:
Majestic has targeted seven teams as candidates to move to the Los Angeles area: the Buffalo Bills, Jacksonville Jaguars, Minnesota Vikings, St. Louis Rams, San Diego Chargers, Oakland Raiders and San Francisco 49ers.
Schwarzenegger Signs L.A. Football Stadium Bill to Lure NFL - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News - FOXNews.com

I don't think the Bills are going to be the team because Ralph has said he isn't moving or selling the team as long as he is alive & I doubt the LA group is going to wait until he passes when they can grab a franchise like Jacksonville or St Louis right now. Jacksonville is losing serious money & everyone of their home games has been blacked out in the Jacksonville area due to poor attendance. The Rams are currently for sale to the highest bidder with no pre sale conditions attached to the sale (which means a new owner can potentially buy the team for the sole purpose of relocating it ..... with league approval of course).

The Chargers might consider it as they have been trying (to no avail) to get a new stadium for years. The fact that they would likely still be able to keep a hold on the San Diego market even if they move to LA has to be a positive for them.

The Vikings & 49ers might flirt with the idea but only to get new stadiums built in Minneapolis & San Fran (though the Vikings & Niners both bring in less revenue & are worth less than the Bills ..... which kind of amazes me).

I think there is too much bad blood between Al Davis & LA for him to even consider moving the Raiders back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2009, 07:45 PM
 
744 posts, read 1,760,000 times
Reputation: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by jblake78728 View Post
Looks like LA got the go ahead for a new stadium ..........





Schwarzenegger Signs L.A. Football Stadium Bill to Lure NFL - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News - FOXNews.com

I don't think the Bills are going to be the team because Ralph has said he isn't moving or selling the team as long as he is alive & I doubt the LA group is going to wait until he passes when they can grab a franchise like Jacksonville or St Louis right now. Jacksonville is losing serious money & everyone of their home games has been blacked out in the Jacksonville area due to poor attendance. The Rams are currently for sale to the highest bidder with no pre sale conditions attached to the sale (which means a new owner can potentially buy the team for the sole purpose of relocating it ..... with league approval of course).

The Chargers might consider it as they have been trying (to no avail) to get a new stadium for years. The fact that they would likely still be able to keep a hold on the San Diego market even if they move to LA has to be a positive for them.

The Vikings & 49ers might flirt with the idea but only to get new stadiums built in Minneapolis & San Fran (though the Vikings & Niners both bring in less revenue & are worth less than the Bills ..... which kind of amazes me).

I think there is too much bad blood between Al Davis & LA for him to even consider moving the Raiders back.
The Rams sem the logical choice to go home, just like the Raiders did when they went back to Oakland. Jacksonville is pathetic - 10,000 covered seats and still no sellouts. They also have smallest number of people living within 2 hours of their stadium - the only team in the league under 2 million
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2013, 10:47 AM
 
1,420 posts, read 3,171,802 times
Reputation: 2257
Is Jon Bon Jovi angling to buy the Buffalo Bills? - latimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2014, 10:51 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
271 posts, read 530,616 times
Reputation: 268
Been a few years now, and I think the Toronto experiment wasn't successful. Toronto just won't support a NFL team.

A few things working against the Bills moving to Toronto...

1. Our liquor laws make tailgaiting illegal (and it would be a logistical nightmare to arrange due to the density near the Skydome should these laws be altered for tailgating).

2. High transient population... very few Torontonians, especially those who have arrived in the last twenty years, have a connection to the Bills or Buffalo.... the city itself is unfairly considered a declining, boring, gritty, ugly place deserving of ridicule and absolutely not deserving of any kind of positivity. If a Torontonian follows NFL, he/she is more likely to be a fan of recently successful teams that are often in the public eye, the Cowboys, the Pats, etc.

3. Those that do follow the Bills like heading down south for a game or two a year and making a weekend out of it. Even better if the Sabres are at home on Saturday night (Leafs tix are $$$$$). It costs more sometimes to head in from the Toronto suburbs to go to a Leafs game and grab dinner than it does to drive and house yourself in Buffalo for a weekend and see both a Bills and Sabres game.

4. No appropriate football-only stadium is in the cards. With Ontario's finances in the crapper, the public won't be paying for it.

5. CFL loyalty. This is minor, though. It's more popular out west.

An outside shot is Rogers redeveloping the Skydome and building a football facility slightly outside the city, but the dome is an accessible location right downtown and they've had trouble filling seats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Buffalo area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top