Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-01-2007, 07:48 PM
 
1,755 posts, read 5,332,744 times
Reputation: 241

Advertisements

In 1970 Xerox was in position to become Microsoft, Google, and Apple, all rolled in to one. They were in the perfect position, a company worth $85,000,000,000 and at the mecca of technology at PARC. What happened? Why did this mega-power worth 85bil in 1970 become a flat-liner worth 15bil today? Yes, it's not often a company can claim the title of "Under-preformer" of ALL time. I don't know, maybe they didn't really think getting the numbers right was important. I know this isn't really a LV issue, but maybe someone here can help me understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:07 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,204,096 times
Reputation: 2661
You had to be there Greg...one of the wild rides of the second half of the twentieth century. Second only to the semiconductor biz.

But you really had to be there with a reasonable degree and talent. Was not your scene Greg.

They might have let you fix the machines in the 70s though. They got quite hard up for people and hired almost anyone for a few years then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:09 PM
 
1,755 posts, read 5,332,744 times
Reputation: 241
Quite a businesss model---85bil in 1970---15 bil in 2007.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:15 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,204,096 times
Reputation: 2661
I joined in 1963 and retired in 1995..Dig those numbers up would you?

Too bad you had no capabilities. It was a fun ride. And you were about the right age were you not? Too bad... I always regretted not jumping to the semiconductor industry in the mid 70s. But it was a singularly nice tour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:17 PM
 
1,755 posts, read 5,332,744 times
Reputation: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by olecapt View Post
I joined in 1963 and retired in 1995..Dig those numbers up would you?

Too bad you had no capabilities. It was a fun ride. And you were about the right age were you not? Too bad... I always regretted not jumping to the semiconductor industry in the mid 70s. But it was a singularly nice tour.
So, did Xerox provide you with a retirement package?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:19 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,204,096 times
Reputation: 2661
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheriff View Post
So, did Xerox provide you with a retirement package?
MYOB .........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:25 PM
 
1,755 posts, read 5,332,744 times
Reputation: 241
I just find it to be one of the most incredible business stories of all time how such a powerhouse company in the right place at the right time with huge capitalization could shrink to a "has been" over thirty-five years, or so. Boggles the mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:31 PM
 
1,755 posts, read 5,332,744 times
Reputation: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by olecapt View Post
I joined in 1963 and retired in 1995..Dig those numbers up would you?

Too bad you had no capabilities. It was a fun ride. And you were about the right age were you not? Too bad... I always regretted not jumping to the semiconductor industry in the mid 70s. But it was a singularly nice tour.
32 years with Xerox. Wow. Now I'm really curious to why Xerox is perhaps the worst company modern history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:38 PM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,204,096 times
Reputation: 2661
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheriff View Post
32 years with Xerox. Wow. Now I'm really curious to why Xerox is perhaps the worst company modern history.
No you are not. You are simply a mean old man who looks back and realizes that you missed all the good stuff. Hurts doesn't it.

You really do need counseling Greg. This jealousy is just eating at you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2007, 08:43 PM
 
1,755 posts, read 5,332,744 times
Reputation: 241
In 1970, Hp, Apple and Microsoft were "pipe" dreams. Xerox was clearly the leader in digital tech, with a huge worth. For some reason, Xerox must have decided that copy machines were more important than future digital options, in both hardware and software. Xerox is truly an icon, a sample of close-minded R&D, and stubborn management that has resulted in the WORST COMPANY of ALL TIME. How strange, that you, a @realtor that can't get an address correct was there for the fall of a once great company.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top