Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2018, 01:11 PM
 
Location: S-E Michigan
4,278 posts, read 5,936,083 times
Reputation: 10879

Advertisements

I am not arguing that GM is not facing formidable challenges, only that logic and history have proven many times over that it is impossible to grow by reducing. If cars are not profitable, then determine why and fix the problems! Abandoning an entire large market segment to their competition just because GM is inefficient in that segment will not save GM in the long term. If they can't find and fix the problems in the car segment, these problems will only haunt them in the Truck & SUV segments.


I am glad I voluntarily left GM while still young enough, age 56, to find secure alternative employment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2018, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Frisco, TX
1,879 posts, read 1,554,029 times
Reputation: 3060
Quote:
Originally Posted by MI-Roger View Post
I am not arguing that GM is not facing formidable challenges, only that logic and history have proven many times over that it is impossible to grow by reducing. If cars are not profitable, then determine why and fix the problems! Abandoning an entire large market segment to their competition just because GM is inefficient in that segment will not save GM in the long term. If they can't find and fix the problems in the car segment, these problems will only haunt them in the Truck & SUV segments.


I am glad I voluntarily left GM while still young enough, age 56, to find secure alternative employment.
Honestly, it makes sense that they’re axing several cars and possibly several plants. I believe places like Hamtramck and Fairfax are producing two or three low volume vehicles at them. That doesn’t really make for good business.

I always see tons of Cruzes around. You can get thousands off of MSRP and that’s what is attractive even if their reliable and quality are spotty. Japanese and Korean manufacturers make better small vehicles, and Chrysler, Ford, and now GM have acknowledged that by ceding the market to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2018, 02:42 PM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,429,920 times
Reputation: 13442
It’s a very sad day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2018, 04:27 PM
 
Location: S-E Michigan
4,278 posts, read 5,936,083 times
Reputation: 10879
Who was the last auto manufacturer who existed only on light trucks and SUV's?


Oh, that's right. International Harvester!


GM should be identifying and fixing their car production profitability problems before these same problems destroy their truck business. Or, they can become the next I-H.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2018, 02:40 AM
 
725 posts, read 805,370 times
Reputation: 1697
Cutting out unprofitable business lines is a no brainer. Let the Japanese and Koreans build unprofitable or barely profitable cars and let GM focus on building higher margin pickups, SUVs and crossovers. GM isn’t permenantly reducing their product lines either. They are getting rid of things that don’t sell to allocate billions in capital in electric vehicles which they are poised to be a leader in with Cruise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2018, 07:25 AM
 
7,343 posts, read 4,366,656 times
Reputation: 7659
Quote:
Originally Posted by MI-Roger View Post
I am not arguing that GM is not facing formidable challenges, only that logic and history have proven many times over that it is impossible to grow by reducing. If cars are not profitable, then determine why and fix the problems! Abandoning an entire large market segment to their competition just because GM is inefficient in that segment will not save GM in the long term. If they can't find and fix the problems in the car segment, these problems will only haunt them in the Truck & SUV segments.


I am glad I voluntarily left GM while still young enough, age 56, to find secure alternative employment.
By that logic horse breeders should be trying to fix horses so they can compete with cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2018, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Fort Payne Alabama
2,558 posts, read 2,903,941 times
Reputation: 5014
Quote:
Originally Posted by john620 View Post
They are getting rid of things that don’t sell to allocate billions in capital in electric vehicles which they are poised to be a leader in with Cruise.
Like the Volt? Oh wait they are killing that too!
The Silverado is fixing to drop behind the Ram in sales, it's not even a race anymore with the Ford F150.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2018, 10:30 PM
 
725 posts, read 805,370 times
Reputation: 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreggT View Post
Like the Volt? Oh wait they are killing that too!
The Silverado is fixing to drop behind the Ram in sales, it's not even a race anymore with the Ford F150.

Volt is a hybrid. It is a great car and I personally loved the ability to charge the battery on gas while driving but it is too expensive for the market and people aren’t buying enough to make a profit. GM is getting rid of the Volt so it can eventually make a profitable all electric car that is 5-10k cheaper than the dual gas-electric.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2018, 01:01 PM
 
Location: S-E Michigan
4,278 posts, read 5,936,083 times
Reputation: 10879
Below is the list of Assembly Plants GM has closed since 2000, in no particular order:
  • New United Motors Manufacturing Inc (now Tesla site)
  • Oklahoma City, OK
  • Shreveport LA
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Linden, NJ
  • Wilmington, DE
  • Baltimore, MD
  • Janesville, WI
  • Lansing #2, MI
  • Pontiac Truck, MI
  • 1/3 of Oshawa Auto-plex, ONT (Oshawa had three Assembly plants)
  • St Therese, Quebec
  • Moraine, OH
With the latest round of announcements GM will be closing the additional assembly plants:
  • Lordstown, OH
  • Hamtramck, MI
  • Remaining 2/3's of the Oshawa Auto-plex, ONT
Since 2000 GM has only opened one new Assembly Plant in US or Canada
  • Lansing Delta Twp, MI
The above is based on my memory only, I managed construction projects at all of these sites with the lone exception of St Therese, and it does not include any of the Engine, Transmission, and Stamping plants which have also been closed since 2000.


GM keeps loping off the infected limbs, but I see no evidence they have found and cured the underlying disease yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2018, 01:49 PM
 
Location: moved
13,650 posts, read 9,708,585 times
Reputation: 23480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soccernerd View Post
I always see tons of Cruzes around. You can get thousands off of MSRP and that’s what is attractive even if their reliable and quality are spotty. Japanese and Korean manufacturers make better small vehicles, and Chrysler, Ford, and now GM have acknowledged that by ceding the market to them.
I see "tons" of Cruzes, and even Darts and Fusions, here in Ohio. But in DC or Los Angeles, these cars are rarities. Instead one sees Civics and Sentras, or upmarket alternatives.

All of the domestic Big 3 have decided that conventional passenger cars lack sufficient business-case. This is sorely disappointing to the portion of the buy-American crowd, which still wants a sedan or coupe. But how large is that market? I would love to have a new car with a carburetor and a hand-crank (in lieu of electric starter), but how large is that market?

GM is infamous for cancelling its more memorable cars, just as they were beginning to become good (Pontiac Fiero, Chevy Caprice, Pontiac G8, Chevy SS). But this time, one suppose that their hard-nosed business-decision is quite rational.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top