Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-18-2012, 09:02 AM
 
Location: Mississippi Delta!
468 posts, read 786,135 times
Reputation: 268

Advertisements

Did Jerry Brown's father Pat lay the groundwork for making California the "progressive" haven it is today?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-18-2012, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Balducci View Post
Did Jerry Brown's father Pat lay the groundwork for making California the "progressive" haven it is today?
He expanded upon policies put forth by the two moderate Republican governors who preceded him. His education policies and his view of infrastructure and development to help build up the state were merely furthering efforts by Warren and Knight to help build up the state. West Coast governors of that time regardless of party shared in that pro-development consensus ; Washington's Democratic Governor Al Rossellini and Oregon's Republican governor Mark Hatfield followed similar policies.

California still possesses the infrastructure - the highways, roads, aqueducts, and schools - that the elder Brown built, but his California seems lost now. CA under the elder Brown - and the two Republicans who preceded him - today seems like a lost paradise, almost a mirage that from today's standpoint seems "too good to be true". While Jerry played some role in shaping policy as an adviser to his father, he is a very different man. He has fiscally conservative instincts his dad did not have, and an environmental consciousness his dad did not have. His father was the last governor to have the old part time legislature to deal with, and the old part time legislature managed to get much more done than the current broken full time legislature despite the frat house, boys' club atmosphere in Sacramento at the time. Politicians of both parties back then, whatever their personal failings, had more of a desire to serve the state and their constituents. Even compared to the legislature that Jerry had to deal with when he was governor the first time around, the current legislature is a dysfunctional hyperpartisan mess scared of taking any measures to save the state.

Most importantly, Pat Brown (and his GOP predecessors and successor) did not have Prop 13 as a shackle. If he did, he could never have gotten anything done and California would have declined much earlier than it did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 12:47 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,471,872 times
Reputation: 29337
Not to mention he seemed smarter than his son!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 12:52 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,397,340 times
Reputation: 11042
He laid the groundwork for a progressive place (in the late 19th century sense of the word) that has long since vanished. Replaced by a crazed, millenarian, quasi Trotskyite / quasi Democratic Republic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 01:21 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,446,365 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
California still possesses the infrastructure - the highways, roads, aqueducts, and schools - that the elder Brown built, but his California seems lost now.
Pat Brown built those for 15M people. Jerry pretty much put an end to capital investment in his first stint as governor. Now we have 37M people working with an aging infrastructure designed for less than half that. Jerry also allowed government workers to unionize during his first governorship. So instead of our taxes going to build things we can all benefit from, they go to pay people $100k/yr to not work for 25 years. I'd say Jerry is the father of California's present reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,339,531 times
Reputation: 21891
How many of us remember things that lived here during the time are the Elder Brown spent all our money and put us into debt.

We were able to climb out of debt and had a reserve when Ronald Reagan started running things.

When the younger Brown took office (the first time) he was able to spend all that money in the reserve fund.

When Deukmeigan (spelling) took office he was left with no money and left office with a reserve.

Not sure what the Browns have done for the state, other than to spend all the money and tax us to death.

Sure does make a case for reading history now doesn't it. Then again I am sure many of you will actually vote for the tax increases that Brown is pushing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
Pat Brown built those for 15M people. Jerry pretty much put an end to capital investment in his first stint as governor. Now we have 37M people working with an aging infrastructure designed for less than half that. Jerry also allowed government workers to unionize during his first governorship. So instead of our taxes going to build things we can all benefit from, they go to pay people $100k/yr to not work for 25 years. I'd say Jerry is the father of California's present reality.
Given the state's population growth, perhaps Pat's policies were too successful in that they created other problems. Pat himself said that his biggest mistake as governor was supporting the building of the California Aqueduct, given that it alienated his Northern Californian supporters while it did not get him support in Southern California.

Not only was collective bargaining for state workers - a mistake which occurred under Jerry's governorship in the '70s - a mistake, but Proposition 13 occurred right in the middle of Jerry's governorship - which has damaged the state more than anything else. Young Moonbeam IMO was a good governor but he had his flaws. Sadly, Old Moonbeam has to deal with a state whose politics and economy are totally broken, and it is beyond his ability to put it back together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
How many of us remember things that lived here during the time are the Elder Brown spent all our money and put us into debt.

We were able to climb out of debt and had a reserve when Ronald Reagan started running things.
Via the largest tax hike in the state's history coupled with budget cuts to demonstrate to fiscal conservatives that he was serious about dealing with the state's budget.

As for Jerry now - as I predicted what would happen, John Perez is much more difficult for him to work with than Leo McCarthy or Willie Brown were when they were Speakers, due to Prop 13, term limits and the special interest takeover.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaHillbilly View Post
He laid the groundwork for a progressive place (in the late 19th century sense of the word) that has long since vanished. Replaced by a crazed, millenarian, quasi Trotskyite / quasi Democratic Republic.
Rather than the first of his kind, in a way he was the last of his kind in Sacramento.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2012, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
The passage of Prop 13 did far more damage than anything Pat Brown did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top