Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-13-2013, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Spokane, WA
231 posts, read 590,729 times
Reputation: 242

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senno View Post
I second this. I've paid a few claims that included gym memberships for life so the injured worker could swim or do gentler exercises in the pool. It's a lot easier on the ol bod.

The constant pain, even if relatively manageable is quite wearing I'm told.

Hope your wife gets some improvement OGTSO.
Thanks Senno!
The cumulative effect of constant pain is surprising. She handles it the best she can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2013, 11:38 PM
 
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
9,197 posts, read 16,843,125 times
Reputation: 6373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
Thank you. Keepin' my fingers crossed.
As are we.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 12:42 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,766,452 times
Reputation: 22087
An interesting article, based on Census Data.

Californians Moving: Census Survey Shows Californians Moving To Texas, Arizona, Washington, Nevada And Other States
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 12:52 PM
 
6,802 posts, read 6,715,308 times
Reputation: 1911
Interesting article. The movement is the lowest rate recorded since the census started. Not so great an exodus really.

And we do seem to be swapping with Texas 2 to 1 about, hehe.

Quote:
The Most Common State-to-State Moves
According to the 2010 American Community Survey, 45.3 million people lived in a different house within the United States one year earlier. Of these movers, 6.7 million lived in a different state. The most common state-to-state moves in 2010 were:
  • California to Texas (68,959 movers)
  • New York to Florida (55,011)
  • Florida to Georgia (49,901)
  • California to Arizona (47,164)
  • New Jersey to Pennsylvania (42,456)
  • New York to New Jersey (41,374)
  • California to Washington (39,468)
  • Texas to California (36,582)
  • Georgia to Florida (35,615)
  • California to Nevada (35,472)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:02 PM
 
Location: in a galaxy far far away
19,209 posts, read 16,696,914 times
Reputation: 33347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senno View Post
Interesting article. The movement is the lowest rate recorded since the census started. Not so great an exodus really.

And we do seem to be swapping with Texas 2 to 1 about, hehe.

Quote:
The Most Common State-to-State Moves


According to the 2010 American Community Survey, 45.3 million people lived in a different house within the United States one year earlier. Of these movers, 6.7 million lived in a different state. The most common state-to-state moves in 2010 were:
  • California to Texas (68,959 movers)
  • New York to Florida (55,011)
  • Florida to Georgia (49,901)
  • California to Arizona (47,164)
  • New Jersey to Pennsylvania (42,456)
  • New York to New Jersey (41,374)
  • California to Washington (39,468)
  • Texas to California (36,582)
  • Georgia to Florida (35,615)
  • California to Nevada (35,472)
Interesting that more people are moving to Georgia from Florida than the opposite, too. I notice people moving to Nevada from California but not many moving back.

Thanks. Not only interesting, it's a current article. Too many links to old articles sometimes. Keep it current.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:07 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,736 posts, read 16,350,818 times
Reputation: 19831
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtrader View Post
Good for California. Too bad for Arizona, Washington, Nevada etc.
Can't happen fast enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:11 PM
 
Location: in a galaxy far far away
19,209 posts, read 16,696,914 times
Reputation: 33347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
Good for California. Too bad for Arizona, Washington, Nevada etc.
Can't happen fast enough.
Why is it too bad for the other states? Don't the Californians bring their income with them? Isn't that good for the other states' economy? Seems like you don't like Californians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:22 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,736 posts, read 16,350,818 times
Reputation: 19831
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereOnMars View Post
Why is it too bad for the other states? Don't the Californians bring their income with them? Isn't that good for the other states' economy? Seems like you don't like Californians.
Good for California to empty out. Too bad for the others -- they have to fill up -- with anybody. Income doesn't create space between bodies. Seems like just the opposite. I am a Californian, since 1966.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 01:28 PM
 
Location: in a galaxy far far away
19,209 posts, read 16,696,914 times
Reputation: 33347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
Good for California to empty out. Too bad for the others -- they have to fill up -- with anybody. Income doesn't create space between bodies. Seems like just the opposite. I am a Californian, since 1966.
Regarding that comment. California isn't going to empty out. It's just going to be replaced with people who won't or can't contribute to the tax revenue.

I got you beat, though. I've been in California since 1952
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:16 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,766,452 times
Reputation: 22087
Quote:
COMMENT 1
Good for California to empty out. Too bad for the others -- they have to fill up -- with anybody. Income doesn't create space between bodies. Seems like just the opposite.
Quote:
COMMENT 2
Regarding that comment. California isn't going to empty out. It's just going to be replaced with people who won't or can't contribute to the tax revenue.
I agree with comment 2. What Comment #1 is not looking at, and Comment #2 is looking at, is that the ones that are leaving the state are the productive, earning money and paying taxes population. What is replacing them, is the people that are taking much lower jobs if they can find one (REMEMBER HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT), and are the ones that are causing California to have the highest poverty rate in the nation where nearly 25% of the population is living in poverty, and is causing California to be using up 1/3rd of all poverty funds in the nation which is far more than their share of the poverty funds in the nation.

The combination of falling tax receipts due to less higher and middle income people, and the poverty rolls growing, is why tax receipts are falling in California which contributes to it's huge budget deficit. As California has just proven, their leaders solutions is to raise the taxes on the people in the state who are the earners in the state. The more middle income and rich people leaving the state, the more they will have to raise the taxes on the earners to support the ones that are receiving, etc.

#Comment 1--Keep asking for more people to flee the state, and in effect beg the legislature and governor to raise your taxes in return which will be their only real option. Then the round robin effect begins again, as raising taxes will drive more companies and people from the state that are escaping paying taxes, which will get your taxes raised again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top