Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2013, 06:38 AM
 
1,320 posts, read 2,698,608 times
Reputation: 1323

Advertisements

Saw this and wanted to share it.

The article states that prisons were sterilizing women, ant that California in particular is guilty of this practice.

Anyone have any further info on this? Is this old news? According to the article, this was happening fairly recently.

This will surely lead to lawsuits against the state, won't it?

Here's the link:

California Prisons Were Illegally Sterilizing Female Inmates
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2013, 11:51 AM
 
Location: in a galaxy far far away
19,208 posts, read 16,689,350 times
Reputation: 33346
Lawsuits? Probably. But doggonit, finally someone had the good sense to stop these people from spawning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Carmichael, CA
2,410 posts, read 4,454,794 times
Reputation: 4379
Slippery slope issue. The women did sign consent forms, whether they were talked into it or at their own request, so lawsuits might not be likely.

One comment was made that doctors routinely suggest this after a difficult C-section birth. Maybe some doctors do, but I don't think that's an industry standard.

However, the really tacky remark by the doctor about the cost savings over lifetime welfare payments will probably get people upset.

Oregon was actively engaged in eugenics up until 1983, not sure about laws in other states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
9,197 posts, read 16,839,999 times
Reputation: 6373
Dr. Heinrich seems to be harkening back to a rather diabolical sort of German "medicine" practiced many decades ago...

Quote:
One doctor, Dr. James Heinrich, who used to work at Valley State, defended the procedure as cost efficient:
Quote:
The 69-year-old Bay Area physician denied pressuring anyone and expressed surprise that local contract doctors had charged for the surgeries. He described the $147,460 total as minimal.


“Over a 10-year period, that isn’t a huge amount of money,” Heinrich said, “compared to what you save in welfare paying for these unwanted children – as they procreated more.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 02:55 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,819,598 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb73 View Post
Slippery slope issue. The women did sign consent forms, whether they were talked into it or at their own request, so lawsuits might not be likely.

One comment was made that doctors routinely suggest this after a difficult C-section birth. Maybe some doctors do, but I don't think that's an industry standard.

However, the really tacky remark by the doctor about the cost savings over lifetime welfare payments will probably get people upset.

Oregon was actively engaged in eugenics up until 1983, not sure about laws in other states.
The same thing can be said about the cost savings and crime reduction because of leagalizing abortion. It is the same principle, just at a different juncture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
9,197 posts, read 16,839,999 times
Reputation: 6373
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
The same thing can be said about the cost savings and crime reduction because of leagalizing abortion. It is the same principle, just at a different juncture.
Legalized abortion and eugenics are the same principle?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 03:18 PM
 
Location: the illegal immigrant state
767 posts, read 1,743,421 times
Reputation: 1057
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereOnMars View Post
Lawsuits? Probably. But doggonit, finally someone had the good sense to stop these people from spawning.
LOL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdumbgod View Post
Dr. Heinrich seems to be harkening back to a rather diabolical sort of German "medicine" practiced many decades ago...
Good thing he doesn't have a German surname or else there would be some irony here!!

More generally replying to the topic, this is for the better. Just imagine (1) how many more children those women would have had, (2) what kind of a life those women would have given those children and (3) how big of a burden those children would have been to the taxpayers not only for their childhood living expenses but for their incarceration in their teens and beyond.

This program should be expanded from the prison system to all emergency rooms giving taxpayer-subsidized child deliveries to people who can't afford to raise those children.

Just imagine what CA would be like in the years ahead if people had only as many children as (1) they could actually provide for and (2) whose social services they could fund with their contributions to the tax base. This might actually be a good place for the middle class to raise children!

Until this fantasy is realized, we'll have... what we have now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 03:29 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,819,598 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdumbgod View Post
Legalized abortion and eugenics are the same principle?
When it is optional (like at the prison) it serves the same purpose, just as handing out condoms, to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
9,197 posts, read 16,839,999 times
Reputation: 6373
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
When it is optional (like at the prison) it serves the same purpose, just as handing out condoms, to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Except, the OP was discussing an article that suggested that the prison program, in practice, may not necessarily have been "optional".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 03:37 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,819,598 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdumbgod View Post
Except, the OP was discussing an article that suggested that the prison program, in practice, may not necessarily have been "optional".
Except the article the OP linked says people are not forced, just explained their options. Much like if you are overweight and go to your doctor the doctor explains to you why being overweight is bad and options on how to correct it. You are not forced to go on a diet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top