U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2014, 06:55 PM
 
4,235 posts, read 7,545,088 times
Reputation: 10176

Advertisements

Does this mean we can stop wasting water on the Salton Sewer?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2014, 09:55 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, originally from SF Bay Area
40,670 posts, read 72,578,400 times
Reputation: 50109
Having been one of the people implementing drought rationing programs at EBMUD in the Bay Area in 1976-77, I think it might be wise to take this seriously. With the main reservoirs serving the by are still fairly full, it may not be too bad this summer, especially if there is any early spring rain and snow. If you get a second year of drought, though, 2015 will be a nightmare. This is starting off just as id did back then. You now have lower per-capita water use due to conservation measures and some alternative water sources, but you also have many more homes, and some of them with extensive landscaping. I remember even in 1977 people in the San Ramon Valley paying $3,000/month for water with penalty charges because their landscaping was worth $50,000 or more. I'm still in utilities in Seattle, and while our ski resorts are barely open with a small percentage of normal snowfall, we don't depend on it as much because we get so much rain all year. The storms are just missing the west coast, and the result is the huge snowstorms hitting the east.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2014, 01:52 AM
 
Location: McKinleyville, California
6,413 posts, read 10,127,735 times
Reputation: 4285
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeauCharles View Post
Checked the thermometer on my patio - 62F at 1AM in the Sacramento Valley in late January. LOL- amazing.
I live on the coast 90 miles from the Oregon border, usually we would be in the mid 40's to low 50's in the daytime and if it was not raining, we would be having morning frost. It was 62º at 1 am here on the coast and 66º at 7 am. It only got to 68º today.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2014, 01:06 PM
509
 
5,484 posts, read 5,995,728 times
Reputation: 7953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Having been one of the people implementing drought rationing programs at EBMUD in the Bay Area in 1976-77, I think it might be wise to take this seriously. With the main reservoirs serving the by are still fairly full, it may not be too bad this summer, especially if there is any early spring rain and snow. If you get a second year of drought, though, 2015 will be a nightmare. This is starting off just as id did back then. You now have lower per-capita water use due to conservation measures and some alternative water sources, but you also have many more homes, and some of them with extensive landscaping. I remember even in 1977 people in the San Ramon Valley paying $3,000/month for water with penalty charges because their landscaping was worth $50,000 or more. I'm still in utilities in Seattle, and while our ski resorts are barely open with a small percentage of normal snowfall, we don't depend on it as much because we get so much rain all year. The storms are just missing the west coast, and the result is the huge snowstorms hitting the east.
It will be much worse this time for water.

Looks like power generation will be ok due to all the natural gas turbine plants sited in California the past few years. So much for wind and solar!!

Anyway...you would enjoy reading this paper. Interesting to see if there is a more current policy paper on drought management in California.

http://www.water.ca.gov/waterconditi...port_87-92.pdf
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2014, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,341 posts, read 3,060,196 times
Reputation: 5346
LOL @ the Salton sewer.

True it's an environmental disaster even if a picturesque and sublime area. The fact is that letting it dry up would be an even bigger catastrophe on account of what's at the bottom of it and the prevailing wind patterns. Multiply Owens Lake about a hundredfold and you'll see why letting the Salton Dry up would be the worse of two evils.

Personally, I'd like to see it reconnected to the Gulf Of California as it once was. There are water marks still clearly visible on many of the hillsides in and around Indio, Coachella, etc. That would involve a few sticks of TNT and some bulldozers in Mexico, but it can be theoretically done. After all, almost all of the Imperial/Coachella Valleys are at or below sea level. Remember that the valley that holds the Salton Sea is really a landward extension of the Gulf.

The down side to that of course would be in order to re-submerge that basin and bring it up to sea level would mean that Indio, Mecca, Brawley, El Central, Calexico, and Mexicali-as well as countless acres of prime farmland, not to mention much of Anza-Borrego park would all be under water.

But it would solve the Salton Sea issue.....
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2014, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Vegas
1,789 posts, read 2,051,445 times
Reputation: 1788
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
And in the middle of what appears to be a reasonable post you insert this zinger, and yet cite no source for said claim, or what interference creates said unexpected crisis. Therefore, it discredits the entire post. If you're trying to tie this to your previous post about only allowing a certain amount of water to be diverted to not make fish extinct it would seem your point is backwards. Without diverting water to LA, and the central valley for agriculture which is a man made interference there would be no problem. So are you promoting that we kill off natural species before limiting water allotments to LA lawns, and central valley agriculture to assure profits are maintained even with a world wide resource available too easily make up for any shortages? Agriculture is no longer limited to the US.
Other than environmentalism, which is a form of politics, what reasons are there for diverting water from agricultural uses?

What reasons are there for building communities in environmentally sensitive areas?

This was not a "zinger" but a statement of fact.

I've long felt that the Kern River Project was nothing more than a fop to rich investors seeking to draw more people to Los Angeles so they could continue to get rich. Without that water, LA could never exist in its present entity.

It's late in the day for me and I deal badly with confrontational posts at this point in time.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2014, 02:36 PM
 
Location: US
77 posts, read 98,388 times
Reputation: 261
I feel weird-- both empathetic and scared at the same time-- when I see reports of the stormy weather most of the rest of the country is getting right now.

Empathetic because getting blasted by weather you're unused to enduring isn't fun, to say the least.

Scared, because we're getting ZERO of it around here.

I've been seeing Twitter posts with #overit tags in regard to crappy winter weather. It hasn't even started here; it's being very hard to enjoy what appears to be a ludicrously-extended spring because you just know the upcoming summer is going to suck even bigger balls than usual.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 03:13 PM
 
Location: O.C.
2,821 posts, read 3,294,698 times
Reputation: 2099
This is just another example of how shockingly stupid the people who run this state are. We live next to a giant body of water called the PACIFIC OCEAN and we have a DROUGHT?! Anyone ever heard of a "desalination plant"? Build a few, problem solved. Idiots.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,572 posts, read 11,616,293 times
Reputation: 5106
Quote:
Originally Posted by sargentodiaz View Post
Other than environmentalism, which is a form of politics, what reasons are there for diverting water from agricultural uses?
I would think people are more important, but rashing should be in effect.
Quote:
What reasons are there for building communities in environmentally sensitive areas?
Construction has feed me my entire life and is part of growth, but I'm not sure of your angle. I'm never anti growth though except in areas set aside like Yosemite maybe.
Quote:

This was not a "zinger" but a statement of fact.

I've long felt that the Kern River Project was nothing more than a fop to rich investors seeking to draw more people to Los Angeles so they could continue to get rich. Without that water, LA could never exist in its present entity.
You got me on this. I thought the California aqueduct, Parker dam (Colorado), and Owens valley was the LA source, and they were stopped from draining Mono lake. They get 50% of the US allocation from the 5 state agreement.

Honestly, the fish in California have suffered due to mans impact, and is now affecting Washington and all rivers North. As long as we like too eat it should be a consideration in how we treat water allocation in dry years. To think just screw the fish in favor of agriculture would be very short sighted.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2014, 09:35 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 23,163,046 times
Reputation: 11002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Having been one of the people implementing drought rationing programs at EBMUD in the Bay Area in 1976-77, I think it might be wise to take this seriously. With the main reservoirs serving the by are still fairly full, it may not be too bad this summer, especially if there is any early spring rain and snow. If you get a second year of drought, though, 2015 will be a nightmare. This is starting off just as id did back then. You now have lower per-capita water use due to conservation measures and some alternative water sources, but you also have many more homes, and some of them with extensive landscaping. I remember even in 1977 people in the San Ramon Valley paying $3,000/month for water with penalty charges because their landscaping was worth $50,000 or more. I'm still in utilities in Seattle, and while our ski resorts are barely open with a small percentage of normal snowfall, we don't depend on it as much because we get so much rain all year. The storms are just missing the west coast, and the result is the huge snowstorms hitting the east.
Technically, from a water year standpoint, the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 water years were deficient. If the 2013- 2014 water year ends up deficient that would make this the 3rd year of drought.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top