Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2014, 08:21 PM
 
Location: zooland 1
3,744 posts, read 4,063,619 times
Reputation: 5531

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DMenscha View Post
Oh please. I'm very well acquainted with both the Sheriff, the head of the Narcotics Enforcement Unit, and at least a half dozen deputies. The county does collect money from the DEA for a few helicopter flights and raids on large grows on public land. Should they? Doesn't seem to stop anyone from growing every season. They also use the money to keep one or two deputies on the payroll that we might not be able to afford. They are largely successful in locating big grows. The SO knows the best spots and it's not hard to find them using aerial assets.

Given prop 215, nobody cares about growers on private land so long as they stay within the prop 215 guidelines. I mean Nobody.


By your response I would take it that you are a dope user.. grower.. or supporter?.. or all of the above?

And plenty of people "care".. We care about an ulitmately destructive force in our country... and all narcotics are harmful (again.. to those who are dying or have a true documented illness with demonstrable ailments where narco helps.. ok)

If you really wanted to see.. you would.. you choose blinders by default or by design.. which makes you little different than the dirtbag grower

Very few growers are staying within the guildelines where I live.. how about your county.. have any stats on compliance? I think the S.O. stated that 90 percent of the grows are OUT of compliance here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2014, 08:44 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,578 posts, read 16,084,754 times
Reputation: 19606
Quote:
Originally Posted by notmeofficer View Post
And plenty of people "care".. We care about an ulitmately destructive force in our country... and all narcotics are harmful (again.. to those who are dying or have a true documented illness with demonstrable ailments where narco helps.. ok)

If you really wanted to see.. you would.. you choose blinders by default or by design.. which makes you little different than the dirtbag grower
"If you cared - you'd see it MY way!" Sounds like a catchy title for a tune, don't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top