U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2008, 02:56 PM
 
Location: where you sip the tea of the breasts of the spinsters of Utica
8,299 posts, read 13,600,756 times
Reputation: 8084

Advertisements

One of the main causes of homelessness (aside from mental illness) is the simple fact that there isn't enough cheap housing that's easy to get into. There wasn't much homelessness back in the days when cities had many SROs (single room occupancies or flophouses), which didn't really go through some interminable references check, didn't need huge deposits, and cost a pittance compared to today's prices. It wasn't unusual 40 years ago for such a room to cost $60 per month. Even corrected for inflation, that's a lot less than now.

People often mention public housing, but did any of you realize that middle class people with decent incomes are just as qualified to get into those apartments as poor and homeless people (in fact mentally ill homeless people are much less likely to get into such housing due to the extensive application process and the background checks). That's why you see so many new cars parked outside those buildings .... sure some of them are drug dealers, but most of them are owned by people with a relatively high income from good jobs.

If the requirements were a low income, perhaps no more than would be received from social security, that would open up a tremendous number of apartments for the genuinely needy. Together with partly subsidized SROs and outreach for the mentally ill, the problem of homelessness would be mostly solved.
Rate this post positively

 
Old 03-01-2008, 03:23 PM
 
Location: California
11,464 posts, read 18,706,575 times
Reputation: 12702
One things for sure, allowing the homeless to sleep and pollute the public streets is not the answer to the problem, massive homeless shelters, education, rehabilitation and teaching self worth would be much better to turn their lives around and make areas cleaner and safer for everyone.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 03-01-2008, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, WA
7,477 posts, read 15,302,864 times
Reputation: 8648
Roaddog,

I agree with you. But unfortunately many towns like Santa Cruz will simply take a 'path of least resistance' approach IMO. The quickest, easiest way to 'attempt' to solve the problem is to just try and drive them out by force if necessary.

Of course there are always two sides to every story. I'm sure local residents don't necessarily want homeless folks sleeping in their parks and neighborhoods. And as grand as many of the ideas are about alternative solutions, what will the city do in the mean time without also these new shelters, rehab programs, etc...? It really is a complex socioeconomic public issue - one that won't be solved overnight no matter how many new laws or programs are started.

The real question is does Santa Cruz have the moral fiber to actually take a proactive approach and work on long term solutions. Or will they just attempt to brush them under the carpet and 'clean up' the streets by force.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 03-01-2008, 09:28 PM
 
Location: zooland 1
3,744 posts, read 3,891,705 times
Reputation: 5531
clean up the street by force? youve got to be on another planet...

does anyone here really believe that a policeman wants to go screw with some homeless person... no way... we dont.. not unless that person is a criminal

If people dont like the laws.. theres process.. your leaders made them.. vote em out
Rate this post positively
 
Old 03-02-2008, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, WA
7,477 posts, read 15,302,864 times
Reputation: 8648
Well,

I think the police officer is just doing his job. So no I really don't think he 'wants' to screw with homeless people. But if that becomes law he 'will' do it.

So it really is an issue of local legislation. And that is my point. The officer is just along for the ride - a pawn in the politcal process in a similar way that the homeless guy/gal is. And of course he ends up looking like the bad guy when people observe him performing 'the bust' or chasing them off.

But again as I stated above, the real question is "does Santa Cruz have the moral fiber to actually take a proactive approach and work on long term solutions?" While touted as a liberal, open minded town, what will they do about a real societal problem beyond the path of least resistance?

Last edited by MtnSurfer; 03-02-2008 at 01:59 PM..
Rate this post positively
 
Old 03-02-2008, 04:12 PM
 
Location: where you sip the tea of the breasts of the spinsters of Utica
8,299 posts, read 13,600,756 times
Reputation: 8084
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnSurfer View Post
....But again as I stated above, the real question is "does Santa Cruz have the moral fiber to actually take a proactive approach and work on long term solutions?" While touted as a liberal, open minded town, what will they do about a real societal problem beyond the path of least resistance?
Well, I've been homeless in Santa Cruz, so I can tell you that there are a remarkable number of resources for a city that size - I think about 75,000 population?

There's a city homeless resource center down on Coral St, it serves breakfast and supper, has showers, toilets, mail, nurses station, a shelter there on the grounds which houses a few people, and busing to other shelters - church and armory. In another place the Catholics serve a very good lunch and also have showers.

I think there might be some sort of counselling, but in general Santa Cruz is very lacking in good mental health care. There's no outreach whatsoever, and the mentally ill who can't tolerate being around other people are a large percentage of the homeless who choose not to sleep at the shelters. But there are others like some drunks and drug addicts who don't want to do without their drug at night, and these are probably the biggest source of trouble with thefts, robberies, and panhandling.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 03-02-2008, 09:09 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, WA
7,477 posts, read 15,302,864 times
Reputation: 8648
I am glad to hear about some of the resources currently available there. And I appreciate you sharing your story. I have a cousin who was homeless up there and so I can sympathize with the problem. Obviously it is a complex one.

As you mentioned there are different reasons for people being homeless. The mental health issue is a big one which sounds like still goes largely unaddressed. Many of these folks are not 'bad' people but rather just down on there luck or have mental issues that need real intervention. Its good to hear that some of the churches are stepping up.
Rate this post positively
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top