Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2014, 03:21 PM
 
Location: O.C.
2,821 posts, read 3,536,119 times
Reputation: 2102

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nslander View Post
Or we could stop bleeding 80% of our water supply to sustain largely corporate interests which comprise a tiny portion to our state GDP so they can grow things like cotton in semi-arid land and sell it on the global market!
Or we could take some of that $10 BILLION a year given to illegals....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2014, 03:43 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,558,208 times
Reputation: 3594
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbell75 View Post
Or we could take some of that $10 BILLION a year given to illegals....
Well, you are consistent. If we stopped the groundwater gravy-train to an agri-business that's also dependent on cheap labor, both our goals could largely be met.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2014, 06:48 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,183 posts, read 107,774,599 times
Reputation: 116077
Quote:
Originally Posted by nslander View Post
Well, you are consistent. If we stopped the groundwater gravy-train to an agri-business that's also dependent on cheap labor, both our goals could largely be met.


I just read that some of that groundwater, which is getting depleted, so farmers have to drill into ever-deeper aquifers, is being used for especially thirsty crops, like almonds. Now come on, people, we can live without almonds in order to safe some groundwater, can't we? Imagine all those candies and baked goods without almonds (the chocolate industry would pitch a fit), we can manage without that, can't we? Or would we rather keep the juggernaut going until its collapse?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2014, 07:20 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
37 posts, read 52,391 times
Reputation: 58
The America's locomotive is getting back on track.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2014, 07:20 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,724 posts, read 16,323,643 times
Reputation: 19794
I have posted on this almond /water thing before. Too lazy to look up the actual stats again, but it's something like California is supplying most of the world's almonds as well as America's. About 90%? Anyway, about 85% of our production goes out of the country. More to China than any other place. The Chinese have developed a passion for our almonds. And, apparently, thus our water. Because it takes about 10% of our state's water to produce those almonds. So we are sending our water to China. Cleverly disguised as almonds. Because the people of California would never put up with just sending our water there in bottles. Right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2014, 09:11 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,183 posts, read 107,774,599 times
Reputation: 116077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
I have posted on this almond /water thing before. Too lazy to look up the actual stats again, but it's something like California is supplying most of the world's almonds as well as America's. About 90%? Anyway, about 85% of our production goes out of the country. More to China than any other place. The Chinese have developed a passion for our almonds. And, apparently, thus our water. Because it takes about 10% of our state's water to produce those almonds. So we are sending our water to China. Cleverly disguised as almonds. Because the people of California would never put up with just sending our water there in bottles. Right?
I'm sure China can find someplace with the right climate conditions at home to grow their own almonds. But now that you mention it, almond-flavored deserts are big in China and Taiwan. I suppose it helps even out the balance of trade between China and the US. Not sure it's worth all that groundwater, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2014, 09:29 PM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,451,396 times
Reputation: 6670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
I have posted on this almond /water thing before. Too lazy to look up the actual stats again, but it's something like California is supplying most of the world's almonds as well as America's. About 90%? Anyway, about 85% of our production goes out of the country. More to China than any other place. The Chinese have developed a passion for our almonds. And, apparently, thus our water. Because it takes about 10% of our state's water to produce those almonds. So we are sending our water to China. Cleverly disguised as almonds. Because the people of California would never put up with just sending our water there in bottles. Right?
Good point. Also overlooked is the role of industrialized almond production in the increasing disappearance of bees thru Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). Basically most of the nation's bee supply is shipped out here for the pollination season, and then they get shipped back home again, often ending up either dead or heavily infected with mites and other pathogens which they pass on.

Are California Almonds Destroying the U.S. Bee Supply?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2014, 11:41 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,183 posts, read 107,774,599 times
Reputation: 116077
Back to the state's new surplus, I discovered that during his first governorship, he also left the state with an enormous surplus. I also found this, about his stint as Sec'y of State. This Moonbeam guy sounds ok!


In 1970, Brown was elected California Secretary of State. Brown argued before the California Supreme Court and won cases against Standard Oil of California, International Telephone and Telegraph, Gulf Oil, and Mobil for election law violations.[7] In addition, he forced legislators to comply with campaign disclosure laws. While holding this office, he discovered the use of falsely notarized documents to earn a tax deduction by then-President Richard Nixon. Brown also drafted and helped to pass the California Political Reform Act of 1974, Proposition 9, passed by 70% of California's voters in June, 1974. Among other provisions, it established the California Fair Political Practices Commission.

I'd sure like to know what those election law violations were! Sounds like Big Oil was rigging politics in their favor. It's amazing what goes on that you don't know about until someone bothers to investigate.

GO, JER-RY! JER-RY! JER-RY!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2014, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
9,197 posts, read 16,836,094 times
Reputation: 6373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post

GO, JER-RY! JER-RY! JER-RY!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2014, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,537,472 times
Reputation: 16453
Quote:
Originally Posted by nslander View Post
Or we could stop bleeding 80% of our water supply to sustain largely corporate interests which comprise a tiny portion to our state GDP so they can grow things like cotton in semi-arid land and sell it on the global market!
Idea!

Let's kill a business sector of CA that produces income and jobs (not to mention feeds the world) so folks in LA can have grass lawns and full swimming pools!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top