U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: ?
Conejo Valley 10 50.00%
San Ramon Valley 10 50.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-06-2015, 12:32 PM
 
4,285 posts, read 5,745,124 times
Reputation: 5991

Advertisements

Very tough one. I think these places both possess similar characteristics (scenery, affluence, weather, etc). I live in the SRV and have for a year or so. I really enjoy it here.

I do think the SRV tends to be a little lusher, at least on the west side. I think it is a little prettier because there are more trees, but both are nice in their own right.

I give a slight edge to the San Ramon Valley for the following reasons:

-In general, I just prefer the Bay Area to LA
-Some of the towns have a downtown area, so it doesn't feel completely suburban
-A little bit more in terms of seasons (although this is subtle)
-Better access to public transportation (BART)

Having said this, if I were to live in LA, I think that the Conejo Valley would be a top choice of mine (assuming I worked on the westside). I probably would be able to adjust easier.

I also agree that it is nice to be close to Malibu, which beats any Bay Area beach community hands down. Then again, the Bay Area really isn't about the beach culture, as is LA.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2015, 04:48 PM
 
3,956 posts, read 3,890,125 times
Reputation: 1807
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadwarrior101 View Post
Very tough one. I think these places both possess similar characteristics (scenery, affluence, weather, etc). I live in the SRV and have for a year or so. I really enjoy it here.

I do think the SRV tends to be a little lusher, at least on the west side. I think it is a little prettier because there are more trees, but both are nice in their own right.


Both areas seem to have Oak doted grasslands.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2015, 08:02 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,817 posts, read 3,656,667 times
Reputation: 3284
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
That's not really true, if you can afford to live in the San Ramon Valley you can afford to live closer to Silicon Valley. There are plenty of good paying jobs closer to the SRV. You clearly don't know the area well at all.
LOL, no you can't. Real Estate in Palo Alto and Saratoga costs way more than it does in San Ramon, LOL SRV is the 'bang for yourb buck' east bay, LOL

Oh ya so many good paying jobs there, that's why the Sunol grade and Caldecott are packed every morning going the other way.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2015, 11:11 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,511 posts, read 30,475,967 times
Reputation: 12743
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizardOfRadical View Post
LOL, no you can't. Real Estate in Palo Alto and Saratoga costs way more than it does in San Ramon, LOL SRV is the 'bang for yourb buck' east bay, LOL

Oh ya so many good paying jobs there, that's why the Sunol grade and Caldecott are packed every morning going the other way.
I said you could get closer to Silicon Valley, not buy in the heart of it. Danville and Alamo have median home prices from $1-1.5 million+ while San Ramon is closer to $900K, there are certainly communities closer to SV you could buy a home for those prices. SF is commutable as well, by public transit too unlike SV.

While some people do commute to SV for jobs it's not the primary job center for that region. It's hard to say what is really, you have Bishop Ranch with 30K jobs plus all of the offices off Hopyard and Hacienda in Pleasanton that provide jobs locally for that area.

The Sunol Grade and Caldecott Tunnel are bottlenecks (a steep grade and a tunnel) and much of the traffic is from commuters outside the SRV too (Diablo, Amador, and Livermore Valleys).
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2015, 11:27 AM
 
4,285 posts, read 5,745,124 times
Reputation: 5991
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I said you could get closer to Silicon Valley, not buy in the heart of it. Danville and Alamo have median home prices from $1-1.5 million+ while San Ramon is closer to $900K, there are certainly communities closer to SV you could buy a home for those prices. SF is commutable as well, by public transit too unlike SV.
Yes, you can get closer to the Silicon Valley. However, if you are also looking at schools, you honestly cannot get closer to the Silicon Valley and really be more affordable. Something has to give, per the below:

1. Quality/size of house
2. Quality of schools
3. Commute distance

Some people will choose to live closer to have more mediocre schools (or send their kids to private schools).

Some folks will choose to live closer and get a smaller/older place or possibly a townhouse/condo.

We chose to brave the longer commute, to be in a better community with superior schools and have a nice home.

Unfortunately, you cannot have it all in the Bay Area unless you are independently wealthy.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2015, 01:14 PM
 
3,956 posts, read 3,890,125 times
Reputation: 1807
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I said you could get closer to Silicon Valley, not buy in the heart of it. Danville and Alamo have median home prices from $1-1.5 million+ while San Ramon is closer to $900K, there are certainly communities closer to SV you could buy a home for those prices. SF is commutable as well, by public transit too unlike SV.

While some people do commute to SV for jobs it's not the primary job center for that region. It's hard to say what is really, you have Bishop Ranch with 30K jobs plus all of the offices off Hopyard and Hacienda in Pleasanton that provide jobs locally for that area.

The Sunol Grade and Caldecott Tunnel are bottlenecks (a steep grade and a tunnel) and much of the traffic is from commuters outside the SRV too (Diablo, Amador, and Livermore Valleys).
Most of the commuters to the Silicon Valley come from Pleasonton and Dublin. Walnu Creek, Alamo, and Danville are nicer but also further to commute. I would guess the commute would be well over an hour.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2015, 01:32 PM
 
3,956 posts, read 3,890,125 times
Reputation: 1807
Which area is more expensive?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2015, 05:43 PM
 
3,956 posts, read 3,890,125 times
Reputation: 1807
I was just past the Conejo Valley. Yeah it's scenic but other that it lacks any real sense of place.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2015, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Piedmont, CA
36,008 posts, read 63,811,514 times
Reputation: 20101
Quality of life: San Ramon Valley has one of the most enviable QOLs in the state.

Access to cities and entertainment: San Ramon Valley is closer to a better city environment, Conejo Valley has more entertainment in it's proximity I guess.

Natural Beauty: Tied

Weather: Tied, but I suspect the Conejo Valley is warmer in the winter which is good imo.

San Ramon Valley Cities, Average Family Income, Population
Diablo, CA $388,847...969
Norris Canyon, CA $249,411...1,227
Alamo, CA $241,271...15,639
Blackhawk, CA $236,785...9,297
Camino Tassajara, CA $209,250...1,789
Danville, CA $201,709...42,891
San Ramon, CA $165,897...73,826
Population: 145,638...$192,785 Average Family Income

Conejo Valley, Average Family Income, Population
Lake Sherwood, CA $376,518...1,526
Westlake Village, CA $185,198...8,393
Calabasas, CA $184,070...23,956
Oak Park, CA $173,260...14,512
Agoura Hills, CA $151,500...20,630
Thousand Oaks, CA $145,081...128,126
Population: 197,143...$156,520 Average Family Income
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2015, 09:17 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,817 posts, read 3,656,667 times
Reputation: 3284
Conejo Valley is probably farther from decent entertainment than the San Ramon Valley. But overall The Southland offers more entertainment than the bay. For the most part, they are culturally similar.

Conejo Valley is the white collared white flight area from The San Fernando Valley.

The San Ramon Valley is pretty much inner east bay white flight.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top