Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2015, 01:28 PM
 
14,299 posts, read 11,677,294 times
Reputation: 39059

Advertisements

Earthquakes can't be predicted. Scientists talk about the probability of earthquakes. The last I heard, they place the probability of a very large (8.0+) quake hitting somewhere in California (which is a very large state) over the next 30 years at about 7%.

That means about a 93% chance that such a earthquake will not occur within 30 years, according to these scientists. But that's all talk, as there is no way to predict a seismic event. A 8.0 in my particular area might occur today, or it might not happen for 200 years.

Almost certainly, smaller quakes will happen during the next few decades. And a 6.0 or 7.0 is not all that small, if you're close to the epicenter. (I was near the epicenter of the 5.9 Whittier Narrows quake, and it felt violent enough). But that type of quake is not "The Big One."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2015, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,804,566 times
Reputation: 40166
Quote:
Originally Posted by starfighter View Post
Or is it just another exaggerated prediction of a catastrophe? What do you think? Are you preparing? Tell me all about it!
What's there to think about?

It's a fact - not an opinion or a conjecture but a fact - that large (say, 8.0+) earthquakes have hit California in the past. As an aside, it's also a demonstrated fact that smaller but still substantial earthquakes (say, 7.0+) hit California, doing damage that is not catastrophic but still kills numbers in the double-digits and incurs costs into the tens of billions.

It's a fact that we know what causes these earthquakes: plate movement along faults.

It's a fact that these processes are ongoing and will periodically produce substantial (7.0+) and catastrophic (8.0+) earthquakes.

Seriously, where's even the smallest shred of logic in not thinking there will be such earthquakes in the future in California?

In the short-term, the 'when' is entirely unknown. Over the long-term (ie, measured in centuries), that they will occur is statistically certain.

This is not complicated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2015, 01:51 PM
 
14,299 posts, read 11,677,294 times
Reputation: 39059
Quote:
Originally Posted by genjy View Post
Non-Californians seem waayy too obsessed about CA and earthquakes for sure.
To be fair, it's not a phenomenon that is limited to non-Californians and earthquakes. When my sister moved from Long Beach to Oklahoma, she discovered that she was far more fixated on tornadoes than the natives were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2015, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Edmonds, WA
8,975 posts, read 10,201,315 times
Reputation: 14247
I lived in SD during the 6.9 magnitude "Easter Earthquake" of 2010 centered near Calexico. I can tell you that was one of the scariest things I'd ever experienced. It was surreal and it lasted about a minute, which, when it is happening, is a very very long time. But the damage, even near the epicenter, was comparatively minimal, especially when you look at places like Haiti which was devastated by an earthquake with a similar magnitude. I believe there was just one death from the Easter Earthquake, and that was because someone near the epicenter panicked and ran out of his house and into the street where he was struck by a vehicle.

Anyway - the greater risk to the average Californian from a large 7-8 magnitude centered in a major population area will be the possibility of no electricity / infrastructure / water / cell phone service for a period of maybe 24-96 hours afterward depending on the level of destruction. That's why it's good to have a plan and have your ducks in a row. Like a designated meeting spot for your family. And have an emergency backpack with food/water/water treatment/first aid/other essentials/etc. to cover at least 3-4 days if you have to "live off the grid".

Of course a lot of people ignore this advice. But I always kept one when I lived in CA. I kept it in my car. It's like insurance, except you only have to pay for it once.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2015, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Carpinteria
1,199 posts, read 1,647,948 times
Reputation: 1184
So, we are talking earthquakes. Check out Megaquake, Cascadia Subduction Zone….
The Earthquake That Will Devastate the Pacific Northwest - The New Yorker
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2015, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Edmonds, WA
8,975 posts, read 10,201,315 times
Reputation: 14247
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourdough View Post
So, we are talking earthquakes. Check out Megaquake, Cascadia Subduction Zone….
The Earthquake That Will Devastate the Pacific Northwest - The New Yorker
Yeah that IMO is the far bigger threat to the West Coast. In the hierarchy of natural disasters tsunami is king. The areas within the inundation zones will be completely erased and not a question of if but when.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2015, 03:18 PM
 
2,645 posts, read 3,328,007 times
Reputation: 7358
Yes. Will it devastate the region? No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2015, 03:22 PM
 
1,271 posts, read 2,593,052 times
Reputation: 642
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnSurfer View Post
When will the next alligator bite your leg off!?! Think about it. Better yet, create a thread about. How about the next super hurricane? When will it wipe out FL? It could happen, right?

Only difference is 1) Alligators are harmless as long as you don't go for a backstroke in a lake, it's not like they are walking around at 2AM waiting to rob or car jack you. 2) Hurricane's give enough warning to GTFO, only problem is and I thought about this when living in Miami, even with 95 and the FL turnpike having the southbound lanes turned into Northbound which is what the state would do, the traffic and traffic jams would be an epic nightmare with the population volume.

I think a lot of people were taken by shock during the 2011 Virginia Quake, also cannot forget New Madrid in Missouri and if what happened then happened now.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2015, 03:24 PM
 
2,645 posts, read 3,328,007 times
Reputation: 7358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefox View Post
But the damage, even near the epicenter, was comparatively minimal, especially when you look at places like Haiti which was devastated by an earthquake with a similar magnitude.
^^ This. People outside the state assume because earthquakes devastate third world countries, California will be equally doomed when the "big one" hits. I guess they don't know anything about construction and building standards. Even the big earthquake in Japan did minimal damage. It was the tsunami that did all the damage.

The people who really need to worry about earthquakes are the ones outside the state who don't have the building standards we do. Though rare, earthquakes can happen anywhere. Tragedy doesn't come from the earthquake, it comes from being unprepared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2015, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Washington state
7,027 posts, read 4,887,277 times
Reputation: 21892
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourdough View Post
So, we are talking earthquakes. Check out Megaquake, Cascadia Subduction Zone….
The Earthquake That Will Devastate the Pacific Northwest - The New Yorker
I'm more worried about Ranier going off, but I suppose one will follow the other.

Anyway, you all don't have to worry about California. Big quakes follow me around, and I don't live in California anymore. So the next big one will probably be here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top