Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Where would it be?
Death Valley 0 0%
Yosemite 15 57.69%
Mt. Jacinto Peak 1 3.85%
Big Sur Coast 1 3.85%
Those really tall trees by NorCal's Coast (Redwoods?) 7 26.92%
Lake Tahoe 2 7.69%
South San Diego Wetlands 0 0%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-29-2016, 01:49 PM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,383,240 times
Reputation: 9059

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RosieSD View Post
The reason that San Diegans don't grow Torrey Pines is that they ONLY survive in the very small micro-climate immediately surrounding Torrey Pines State Park (i.e. parts of Del Mar, La Jolla). Plant one in downtown, in Mission Valley, or El Cajon and it'll be dead in a year.

San Diegans don't have much choice when it comes to native trees that grow widely. Most of San Diego county is chapparal, and really our only native trees in the chaparral area are oaks. Thus, we supplement with trees like Eucalyptus, Palms, Calif. Peppers, and a thousand other trees.

Have a great weekend enjoying our state's beauty!
This is total nonsense. Torrey Pines have been planted in Australia, New Zealand and Kenya but they can't be grown with a little extra care in other parts of the climate in the area they are native to? Come on.

They can only grow NATURALLY in their native range but we are talking about landscaping which is never on it's own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2016, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Carpinteria
1,199 posts, read 1,648,438 times
Reputation: 1184
And they grow naturally on Santa Rosa Island….
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrey_pine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 05:00 PM
 
1,770 posts, read 1,662,124 times
Reputation: 1735
California has the biggest tree (and biggest single organism) in the world, the hottest desert in the world and arguably the most impressive glacial valley in the world. I think it would have to be either Sequoia NP, Death Valley NP or Yosemite NP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 08:33 PM
 
719 posts, read 987,178 times
Reputation: 1854
No Shasta love? *Frownie face.*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 09:15 PM
 
5,977 posts, read 13,118,780 times
Reputation: 4920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
That's a pretty tall statement. Are you sure about that? Remember the guy who posted here, who, as a ranger or guide in Yosemite handling groups of European tourists, said that it wasn't unusual for the visitors to comment that they didn't know what the fuss was about, Europe had much more spectacular scenery than Yosemite? ROFL! That just kills me! They thought Yosemite was just another example of overblown American marketing. Now granted, the Alps and the Norwegian fjords are quite breathtaking. But they don't have redwoods! And you're right about the waterfalls; tall waterfalls like that aren't common in Europe.
Neither does Yosemite. Sequoias yes, there is the Mariposa grove and I think another one.

I'm shocked, The Europeans I don't know think that. They think California and the West's natural wonders are like no place on earth.

I've been to the Alps. They are breathtaking but in a different way. Europe's landscape and environment even where beautiful and scenic at least compared with the American West is more modified and altered from centuries of dense and intense human presence. I think the Alps are certainly beautiful, but I felt in a lot of ways there was a rural (albeit very picturesque) village every five miles with the high country being more commercialized for skiing.

BTW: I voted Yosemite. California has endless natural wonders, but Yosemite is iconic in a way that few places are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 09:16 PM
 
5,977 posts, read 13,118,780 times
Reputation: 4920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gentoo View Post
Didn't see this addition. I think a couple of other California wetlands beat it out. In terms of being right next to the beach, I think Orange County, in particular Bolsa Chica win. In terms of wildlife, both in biomass and variety, the wetlands around San Francisco Bay win.
agreed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2016, 09:20 PM
 
5,977 posts, read 13,118,780 times
Reputation: 4920
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosieSD View Post
Gosh, you sure left out a lot of beautiful and awesome places. Off the top of my head, I can think of hundreds of places throughout California that you didn't mention that are state and national treasures. That includes quite a few that are ALREADY national parks, national monuments or national forests that you skipped over, like Sequoia National Park, King's Canyon National Park (you know, the places with those "other" big trees), Joshua Tree National Park, Channel Islands National Park, Lassen, Mohave, Shasta, etc. that you didn't mention.

And, of course, Yosemite and Death Valley are already national parks too, so it seems kind of odd to be debating whether they should be made into National Parks.

And while I love the Tijuana River Estuary National Wildlife Preserve (the name for the biggest part of that "wetlands" in IB, in San Diego County alone, there's Torrey Pines (rare pine trees that only grow there and in one other place on dramatic cliffs over looking the sea), Palomar Mountain, The Laguna Mountains, Anza Borrego State Park (the biggest state park in the U.S. acreage wise and awesomely beautiful), miles of beaches, Cleveland National Forest, etc.

But, pick any county in the state of California, and you can find a host of awesome places to list there too -- there really is no county in California that doesn't have some sort of scenic outdoor wonder of one kind or another that is worth a visit.

California is truly a beautiful place. No need to debate which places are "best" or "most scenic." Everyone has their personal favorites. You could spend a lifetime trying to take all of California's wonders in, regardless of whether they're national parks, national monuments, state parks, county parks, or just beautiful places in the middle of nowhere. I know I have.
Great post. I tell people this all the time. Its the top I love this state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top