Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-11-2018, 06:36 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,294 posts, read 47,056,299 times
Reputation: 34079

Advertisements

I read the entire thing and only agreed with 2 of them. So ya, probably voting against almost all of their choices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2018, 06:54 PM
 
Location: 912 feet above sea level
2,264 posts, read 1,484,575 times
Reputation: 12668
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidt1 View Post
Me too. I think I have posted about this. Whether the LA Times did the research and analysis, or they were paid to shill, I vote against their recommendations mostly because it's fun to **** off people who think they are better voters because they take the time to "read" the ballots.
Voting as would-be spite. Brilliant....

[Don't mistake my combination of pity and contempt as being 'pissed off']
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2018, 06:59 PM
 
8,943 posts, read 11,786,454 times
Reputation: 10871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulsker 1856 View Post
Voting as would-be spite. Brilliant....

[Don't mistake my combination of pity and contempt as being 'pissed off']
Oh no, I am so hurt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2018, 07:18 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,738 posts, read 16,350,818 times
Reputation: 19831
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman1 View Post
Yes. California was just humming along before.

Now there are naked people running around Starbucks and homeless in the streets.

Help! Help! Anyone? Where can we find some liberals to fix this mess?
This just started in your mind? Where were you in the 60’s? I was in San Francisco ... watching naked people run around Golden Gate Park. Plenty of homeless then too.

What is it with people only being capable of subscribing to partisan ideology ... as opposed to, say ... thinking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2018, 07:50 PM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,403,105 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
Lots of sarcasm here from all points of sail ... kinda a comment in itself on the polarization the whole nation has drifted into as de rigueur!
And it will only get worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2018, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,505,733 times
Reputation: 38576
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo666 View Post
I really don't understand any of the "I vote the opposite way" positions - even as jokes.

If you don't bother reading the ACTUAL proposed text (no, not just the summary), don't bother to vote on that issue.

I immediately throw out ads and "you should vote for .." (or against) crap I get in the mail - I can make up my own mind without any help from glossy mailers, thanks.
I agree 100%. I read the actual texts of propositions and do my own research. If I don't understand an issue, and haven't had the time to research it, I don't vote on it.

I do admit that this time around, I'll probably vote straight party line Democrat, even if I don't love the candidates. It will stick in my craw, but I'll do it - this time. For instance, I REALLY wish someone would run against Anna Eshoo on the dem ticket in my district for congress. I'd love to vote for anyone else but her. She's a joke, in my opinion. I wouldn't be surprised if she's the one who leaked Dr. Ford's letter. She's the one who got it and if you've ever watched any of her interviews or her behavior as far on the congressional floor, such as when congress was conducting hearings with Equifax CEO on the data breach, and she showed up late and was the last person to question him, and made a total mockery of the hearing and embarrassed the stuffing out of me, as far as her being a congressperson from CA - you'll understand why I'd LOVE to vote for anyone else but her - who also happens to be a Democrat.

Any Dem takers? Please, run against Anna Eshoo next term and you'll have my vote.

I also don't vote on things that don't affect me, personally - like school superintendent. I don't have kids in school now, so don't feel like I should vote on those types of things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 12:59 AM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,011,395 times
Reputation: 3284
Everyone who actually read this has lost about 5 IQ points.

J+K are such toolbags
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,350,015 times
Reputation: 21891
I listen to John and Ken and for the most part they are spot on when it comes to saving the State from the Socialist that are in office. These people show their blatant disregard for the rule of law and the Constitution of the United States. Nearly everyone of the Liberal Establishment should be placed in Prison for the remainder of their life.

Prop 6 yes yes yes.

To any Bond issue in California you should always vote NO. These people can not figure out how to manage any budget. It has been reported that California with its "5th largest economy" in the world, is anywhere from $1 trillion to $2.3 Trillion in debt. Some people have mentioned that the state may be closer to $5 trillion in debt. That is Trillion with a T.

Why give them more money to play with when they can not figure out how to manage what they have.

Prop 7: I am all for getting rid of Changing the clocks ever. Arizona, Hawaii, most of our Island protectorates, do not follow Day Light Savings time. It does nothing for anyone. You don't gain a thing from moving a clock one hour forward or turning it back.

Prop 10: No, NO, NO. Rent Control does not fix anything at all ever. It would take rental units off the market. Imagine all the people that rent a room out and will now be regulated. I would never rent in those conditions and I don't know any that will. This will take places off the market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 10:17 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,731 posts, read 26,820,948 times
Reputation: 24795
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
Prop 10: No, NO, NO. Rent Control does not fix anything at all ever. It would take rental units off the market...
I disagree. If you vote no on 10, don't complain about the increasing number of homeless in California.

Rent control isn't the answer to California's housing crisis, but it could help. Yes on Prop 10:
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/endor...915-story.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 10:22 AM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,403,105 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
I disagree. If you vote no on 10, don't complain about the increasing number of homeless in California.

Rent control isn't the answer to California's housing crisis, but it could help. Yes on Prop 10:
Rent control isn't the answer to California's housing crisis, but it could help. Yes on Prop 10 - Los Angeles Times
Rent control will not fix the problem, just exacerbate it. People will sell the building or house, etc and the new owners will raise the cost and that drives people out who cannot afford it. The solution, which is impossible, is to fix why they are homeless to begin with; jobs, medical aid, removal to a controlled area when they will not change. Never happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top