Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-03-2020, 09:18 AM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,880,599 times
Reputation: 3601

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by landlock View Post
Seems like there's no simple answer. It's not about "sit padlocked in your places, with a National Guard soldier near every door taking your temperature every few minutes" versus "open up everything immediately and exactly to pre-COVID state". There're many transition states. I'd draw a line where restrictions to access nature start: there's no valid logic behind this and it also cuts people off from very fundamental and essential things and their own land, which is what public lands are. They can require to wear a mask on the beach (though it'd be unnecessary considering all the wind and open air), just like they require one to wear some clothing, but cutting off all access or not allowing one to sit on their towel on the sand is not right.
If it were that simple to get people to wear masks on the beach, that would be the solution. Since in the summer it ranges between uncomfortable and impractical, beach closures will happen instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2020, 09:26 AM
 
460 posts, read 232,236 times
Reputation: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodheathen View Post
If it were that simple to get people to wear masks on the beach, that would be the solution. Since in the summer it ranges between uncomfortable and impractical, beach closures will happen instead.
Well unreasonable closures only will lead to mass violations, disobedience and deliberate touting of social distancing. Not a win even for control nuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2020, 09:32 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,727 posts, read 26,806,307 times
Reputation: 24790
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodheathen View Post
If it were that simple to get people to wear masks on the beach, that would be the solution. Since in the summer it ranges between uncomfortable and impractical, beach closures will happen instead.
Exactly. We can't even rely on people sitting or standing 6 ft apart at the beaches. If we could have, there would've been no need for the closures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2020, 09:56 AM
 
14,308 posts, read 11,697,976 times
Reputation: 39117
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
Exactly. We can't even rely on people sitting or standing 6 ft apart at the beaches. If we could have, there would've been no need for the closures.
There WAS no need for the closures. There is no evidence that people on the beach are spreading the virus. None. Orange County with its (up until now) open beaches has a Covid rate 7.5 times less than Los Angeles with its month-long beach closure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2020, 10:06 AM
 
Location: On the water.
21,737 posts, read 16,346,385 times
Reputation: 19830
Quote:
Originally Posted by saibot View Post
There WAS no need for the closures. There is no evidence that people on the beach are spreading the virus. None. Orange County with its (up until now) open beaches has a Covid rate 7.5 times less than Los Angeles with its month-long beach closure.
There isn’t enough known yet about CV19 to draw such simplistic parallels. The Indonesian island of Bali has a population of 4 million and is a strong destination for Chinese tourists at a rate of ½ million per month. Bali remained open to travel until late March. Yet they have had fewer than 400 cases of CV19. Meanwhile, Gallup NM has a population of less than 25,000, is not a tourist destination, and is one of America’s hot spots for the virus - so much so that roads into the city are now closed to travel.

How come?

We don’t have the data and studies yet to know. That’s why broad policies are put in place until we do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2020, 10:27 AM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,880,599 times
Reputation: 3601
Yeah, Tulemutt (can't rep now). This pandemic calls for proactive behavior, not waiting until things worsen.

As for California beaches specifically, they weren't crowded during the cooler months. Now is the time for a potential hot spot. If I were governor, I personally would have left the Orange County beaches open on some weekdays, with restrictions, but I'm not Newsom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2020, 10:48 AM
 
14,308 posts, read 11,697,976 times
Reputation: 39117
Newsom didn't base his decision to close OC beaches on science or data; he based it on emotion. He saw a few misleading photographs and reacted by "spanking" Orange County. It's not just me saying that. If you are actually interested, you should google and read the readily available statements from the law enforcement, sheriff, and mayors of the towns involved. Those who were actually on the ground at the time observing what was happening at the beaches, not sitting in an office hundreds of miles away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2020, 10:51 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,727 posts, read 26,806,307 times
Reputation: 24790
Quote:
Originally Posted by saibot View Post
Newsom didn't base his decision to close OC beaches on science or data; he based it on emotion. He saw a few misleading photographs and reacted by "spanking" Orange County.
You really believe that the governor of a state with 40,000,000 people bases his decisions on emotion and by viewing a couple of photographs? Come on.

Last edited by CA4Now; 05-03-2020 at 12:00 PM.. Reason: forgot the extra 0s, as someone pointed out to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2020, 11:13 AM
 
Location: On the water.
21,737 posts, read 16,346,385 times
Reputation: 19830
Quote:
Originally Posted by saibot View Post
Newsom didn't base his decision to close OC beaches on science or data; he based it on emotion. He saw a few misleading photographs and reacted by "spanking" Orange County. It's not just me saying that. If you are actually interested, you should google and read the readily available statements from the law enforcement, sheriff, and mayors of the towns involved. Those who were actually on the ground at the time observing what was happening at the beaches, not sitting in an office hundreds of miles away.
How do you know what he based his decision on?

And that others think the same as you means what? How do they know? Just a lot of speculation masquerading as insider knowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2020, 11:20 AM
 
Location: all over the place (figuratively)
6,616 posts, read 4,880,599 times
Reputation: 3601
Many more than 40,000.
It was just a few beaches in Orange County. Newsom said that. It's safe to assume he talked to them about doing more to prevent problems before deciding on closure. If only some beaches in the county had been closed, people would have crowded the open beaches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top