U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Old 05-13-2009, 01:14 AM
2 posts, read 15,215 times
Reputation: 15


Hi everyone,

Last year, I almost purchased a home in California. I got to the point of making an offer, signing a contract, and putting down a deposit. Eventually, however, I ended up backing out amicably.

During the contract process, I signed a DISCLOSURE REGARDING REAL ESTATE AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS form. The exact form in question can be found at:


Is this form binding like a Buyer/Broker agreement? I know there are true Buyer/Broker agreements, such as a Buyer Broker Agreement -- Non-Exclusive/Not for Compensation" (Form BRNN), Buyer Broker Agreement -- Non-Exclusive Right to Represent" (Form BRNE), or a Buyer Broker Agreement -- Exclusive Right to Represent" (Form BRE). The agency disclosure form seems not to have wording that binds me to my buyer's agent at the time.

I ask because the buyer's agent I was working with did not meet my expectations, and I want to work with someone else. I don't want to be stuck in a situation where the old agent is entitled to a commission as a result of this form. I have seen advice that says a buyer should get a written statement releasing them from a Buyer/Broker agreement. I don't see any wording to support this being a Buyer/Broker agreement (I am sure it would state that on the title of the form), but I just wanted to make sure.

Bottom line... my 2 questions:

2) Do I need any written confirmation of being released if I change agents?

Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-13-2009, 12:00 PM
27,778 posts, read 58,425,030 times
Reputation: 22428
I've had to sign those many times when the Listing Agent is also my Agent as Buyer...

Normally, an Agent can only represent one side in a business deal... however, in Real Estate, it's not uncommon for an Agent to represent both buyer and seller and this is a huge potential conflict of interest and that is my understanding of why Dual Agency Disclosure is required in CA...

The idea is that all parties need to be made aware.

I personally like dealing with listing agents because they are often able to answer questions quickly and often are more knowledgeable about the listing... my offer is my offer in either case... I won't make an offer unless it says everything I want it to say with the terms I specify.

I think Dual Agents are more motivated because they keep a larger percentage of the sales commission... although I know my favorite agent discounts her commission if she has both sides of the deal...
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2021, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top