Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-30-2009, 02:38 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,564,755 times
Reputation: 21249

Advertisements

Interesting.

Interactive Map: Water Use Per Capita in California - Sacramento News - Local and Breaking Sacramento News | Sacramento Bee (http://www.sacbee.com/1098/story/1431106.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-30-2009, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,793,178 times
Reputation: 17831
From the article "Counties along the coast tend to use much less water per resident than inland counties."

Before I read that and after I looked at the map, I was thinking population density is inversely proportional to per capita water use. Or, agricultural areas have more water use per capita.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 10:01 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,677,908 times
Reputation: 13635
I wonder if weed growing operations are part of the reason Humboldt County is so high b/c it's one of the wettest areas of CA in addition to it being foggy and cool much of the year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Escondido, CA
1,504 posts, read 6,154,139 times
Reputation: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
From the article "Counties along the coast tend to use much less water per resident than inland counties."

Before I read that and after I looked at the map, I was thinking population density is inversely proportional to per capita water use. Or, agricultural areas have more water use per capita.
I think that's it. Even in coastal counties, agriculture consumes two thirds or more of all water. 250 gallons/resident/day is quite a lot, it's hard for an urban dweller to spend that much (one 10-min shower = 30-50 gallons, one toilet flush - 1.5 gallons).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,112 posts, read 30,640,756 times
Reputation: 16395
Quote:
Originally Posted by esmith143 View Post
I think that's it. Even in coastal counties, agriculture consumes two thirds or more of all water. 250 gallons/resident/day is quite a lot, it's hard for an urban dweller to spend that much (one 10-min shower = 30-50 gallons, one toilet flush - 1.5 gallons).
They didn't count agricultural water use.

I know that in SLO county there has been a big push to use less water over the last few years. I've also noticed there are less lawns and more drought resistant landscaping (with native plants) than in many other areas.

I wonder if lawn and landscaping watering has a large part in this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 10:17 AM
 
1,687 posts, read 6,075,690 times
Reputation: 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by esmith143 View Post
I think that's it. Even in coastal counties, agriculture consumes two thirds or more of all water. 250 gallons/resident/day is quite a lot, it's hard for an urban dweller to spend that much (one 10-min shower = 30-50 gallons, one toilet flush - 1.5 gallons).
Agriculture and industrial uses are left out.

From the bottom of the map page:
Note: Figures show water usage from public water supply, minus use for industry and irrigation, divided by population taking public water (no well water included).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 10:30 AM
 
Location: CA
371 posts, read 1,823,564 times
Reputation: 306
Notice that counties with a lot of large-lot, single family homes have the highest water usages--mainly Central Valley cities like Bakersfield, Modesto, Fresno, etc. and Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.
Also, Central Valley was built on easily obtainable water from the enormous groundwater supply. That groundwater has been drastically reduced, but their water needs were met by the Central Valley water projects due to the importance of water being available for all that government-subsidized agriculture. Low cost, high-water-consuming development piggy-backed on water for ag land. Also, a lot of central valley cities do not meter their water use for residential customers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 10:32 AM
 
Location: 38°14′45″N 122°37′53″W
4,156 posts, read 11,014,110 times
Reputation: 3439
Are Indian Gaming Casinos considered industrial use? I doubt it, and the counties and the casinos seem to line up well....just a thought.

California Casinos SuperSite also Maps, Photos!

California State Association of Counties CA County Map
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2009, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Mokelumne Hill, CA & El Pescadero, BCS MX.
6,957 posts, read 22,319,080 times
Reputation: 6471
I think the data is skewed a bit in rural counties. I'll bet at least 1/3 of my county residents are on well water which is not metered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2009, 01:49 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,413,624 times
Reputation: 11042
Coastal urban county properties are generally lots of house and little land (I realize there are exceptions, but this is the general trend). To boot, lots of folks pave substantial portions of that small land. There you have it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top