Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-06-2014, 06:25 PM
 
Location: LONDON BABY
301 posts, read 521,234 times
Reputation: 283

Advertisements

America tried to annexe Canada once before, and it didn't end well for america

 
Old 04-06-2014, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Gatineau, QC, Canada
3,379 posts, read 5,534,995 times
Reputation: 4438
A truly terrifying idea to me. Canada is already resource exploit-happy as it is and I don't care to test what adding 200 million extra people, many of whom have a tendency to believe that the earth exists solely for human's consmption, will churn out in the name of 'a pretty cool economy, bro'.
 
Old 04-07-2014, 01:13 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,292,554 times
Reputation: 30999
Not much..While Canada would no doubt become an economic super power if we incorporated the USA as an 11th province we are happy with the way things are and really arent into the headspace that requires us to seek or need to be the worlds economic super power.
 
Old 04-07-2014, 01:51 AM
 
Location: Alberta, Canada
3,624 posts, read 3,409,476 times
Reputation: 5556
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Ya gotta love that bit about "this can be accomplished with American capital, know how and military protection."
To a degree, she is correct. The Alaska Highway was a joint project between the US and Canada, designed to get US troops to Alaska during WWII. To the best of my knowledge, the Americans contributed the lions' share of the money. The important thing to note, though, was that it was a bi-national project, incorporating both US and Canadian engineers, and workers.

Quote:
Strange to say the least, the slow but steady progress up there already done on an 'as needed' basis, has managed to be accomplished with none of the above being either offered or required.
I've long held that Canadians are great "makeshifters"; that is, people who can make do with what is available in order to make sure what needs doing, is done. Thus such things as ice roads in the north--not enough traffic to justify proper roads and bridges, but just enough to justify ice roads that get supplies to where they're needed in winter.
 
Old 04-07-2014, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Canada
14,735 posts, read 15,028,112 times
Reputation: 34871
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChevySpoons View Post
To a degree, she is correct. The Alaska Highway was a joint project between the US and Canada, designed to get US troops to Alaska during WWII. To the best of my knowledge, the Americans contributed the lions' share of the money. The important thing to note, though, was that it was a bi-national project, incorporating both US and Canadian engineers, and workers.

I've long held that Canadians are great "makeshifters"; that is, people who can make do with what is available in order to make sure what needs doing, is done. Thus such things as ice roads in the north--not enough traffic to justify proper roads and bridges, but just enough to justify ice roads that get supplies to where they're needed in winter.
Just a comment on the bolded part above. The Alaska Highway was built because America wanted it desperately after Pearl Harbour was bombed. They had actually been wanting it since the 1930's as they wanted a kitty-corner throughway that would bisect all of North America connecting Florida to Alaska. If American had not wanted it so urgently at the time, it would never have been built because Canada had no reason for there to be a highway going through there and were extremely leery and suspicious of giving over so much leeway to a foreign country building anything through Canadian territory. So America did pay more than the lion's share and contributed nearly all of the manpower and equipment. It was built after Pearl Harbour was bombed and the reason given for it being built then was that it was a military emergency and North America was at risk so it was needed to move troops, supplies and equipment to already existing military bases in Alaska. Because Alaska was so close to Russia it would also have been used as a staging area and to help Russia by delivering airplanes, ships and other war supplies to Russia if the need arose, thus bypassing the risk of German submarines in the Atlantic ocean.

It was built mostly by black regiments which is a very interesting story in itself because of the difficulties the blacks from the south had with the northern climate and with the racial obstacles of the time. The following link is really interesting, it features interviews with people who were involved with the project and explains why and how it was built and goes into some of the politics behind it.

Interview . Building the Alaska Highway . American Experience . WGBH | PBS

.

Last edited by Zoisite; 04-07-2014 at 01:08 PM..
 
Old 04-07-2014, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,321,575 times
Reputation: 9789
No thank you.
Canada has everything to lose and the US has everything to gain.
 
Old 04-07-2014, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,321,575 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lieneke View Post
It's hard to believe that a Canadian would think that Canada does not have the resources, manpower, capital, and know how to develop her own country. Something does not add up.
Controversy and book sales add up. Ka-ching!
 
Old 04-07-2014, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Somewhere flat in Mississippi
10,060 posts, read 12,806,906 times
Reputation: 7168
Does a merger mean I get to eat fancy pastries from Quebec?
 
Old 04-07-2014, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Hillsboro, OR
2,200 posts, read 4,421,810 times
Reputation: 1386
The northern US needs to join as new provinces into Canada if nothing else than to save the world from reckless US conservative ideology. A western economy led by Bay Street would be infinitely more responsible than one led by Wall Street.
 
Old 04-07-2014, 05:07 PM
509
 
6,321 posts, read 7,042,755 times
Reputation: 9444
Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
No thank you.
Canada has everything to lose and the US has everything to gain.
As an American who has lived in Canada.....NO thank you.

The two countries have very different cultures.

It is fine just the way it is......well, we would consider Alberta. Maybe we can just make them honorary Americans.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top