Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Cancer
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-05-2012, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, N.C.
36,499 posts, read 54,263,826 times
Reputation: 47922

Advertisements

I ran across this video when reading about Sharon Osborne's recent mastectomy. Does anybody know how this courageous Tamp woman is now doing? i find it alarming that she tested negative for the genetic marker yet got breast cancer anyway.


Anchorwoman's On-Air Cancer Disclosure [10-12-2011] - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2012, 11:43 AM
 
18,969 posts, read 11,634,692 times
Reputation: 69906
Most women who are diagnosed with breast cancer test negative for the BRCA genetic markers. Although they've isolated certain genetic markers, those women with the markers who develop breast cancer represent a smaller percentage of the overall population of women with breast cancers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2012, 01:34 PM
 
18,969 posts, read 11,634,692 times
Reputation: 69906
BTW, here's an update from April 2012 on her condition: Three months after last breast cancer surgery, Linda Hurtado wonders how to remain a survivor.

It surprised me in the video you posted that she, a health reporter, who went through genetic counseling, wasn't better informed about the various risks associated with breast cancer. It shocks me that she still thought, after genetic counseling/testing, that a negative result eliminated her risk. It would have been horrible if she'd shared that kind of advice with her many viewers. You can think of it as three kinds of people who get breast cancer: those with a genetic risk factor, those with familial risk factors, and all others. Those with genetic risk factors who get breast cancer represent the smallest of those three segments. By far, most women who contract breast cancer have no genetic risk. The important thing to know about genetic risk is that those women who do test positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2, have a considerably higher risk of getting breast or ovarian cancer than women (or men) in the general population do.

In any case, this woman in particular had a precancerous atypical hyperplasia and cancerous DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ). They caught it early, she opted for a double mastectomy to reduce her risk of a recurrence to almost 0, and seems to be doing well.

ETA: another story link from april - http://www.yourbreastoptions.com/en-...es.aspx?id=421
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Cancer

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top