Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2012, 08:50 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts

Advertisements

Quote:
Congrats in Apple for winning what is a shoddy case to begin with..
Apparently the jury disagreed.
Quote:
I hope they take comfort in knowing that after their obnoxious corporate behavior not much people will be interested in the upcoming iPhone
I assume the evidence you have to support this claim is about the same as the evidence you have that people are flocking away from the iPhone (I notice you never responded to the sales figures I posted several days ago).
Quote:
All this says to us that Apple was scared from Samsung..
Or they decided to make use of the patents they amassed while developing the iPhone and iOS...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2012, 09:15 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
4,472 posts, read 17,699,609 times
Reputation: 4095
Quote:
Originally Posted by yowps3 View Post
Congrats in Apple for winning what is a shoddy case to begin with..

I hope they take comfort in knowing that after their obnoxious corporate behavior not much people will be interested in the upcoming iPhone

All this says to us that Apple was scared from Samsung.. And what ever Samsung pays now to apple they will get back when apple comes back like a dog to Samsung demanding hardware..
Obnoxious corporate behavior?? Nothing obnoxious about suing for stolen intellectual property. And do you really think ANYONE, besides each company, care about the verdict to the point where it'll sway a decision to purchase a phone from either Apple or Samsung?

Apple doesn't use Samsung hardware...

Where the heck are you getting your information at? Good grief, you're so far out of the realm of reality it's laughable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2012, 09:23 PM
 
1,868 posts, read 3,068,288 times
Reputation: 1627
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonF View Post
Apparently the jury disagreed.
I assume the evidence you have to support this claim is about the same as the evidence you have that people are flocking away from the iPhone (I notice you never responded to the sales figures I posted several days ago).
Or they decided to make use of the patents they amassed while developing the iPhone and iOS...
I'm glad you brought that up.

I remember Steve Jobs saying to the crowd at the very first iPhone event that they had amassed quite a number of patents developing the device and they "intend to protect them."

He wasn't kidding!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2012, 09:29 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Apple doesn't use Samsung hardware...
Actually they do.

http://9to5mac.com/2011/10/11/iphone...-bom-analysis/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 01:32 AM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,671,195 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedyAZ View Post
Apple doesn't use Samsung hardware...

Where the heck are you getting your information at? Good grief, you're so far out of the realm of reality it's laughable.
Really? Perhaps you should learn to keep before you stick your nose up in the air.
Apple and Samsung's symbiotic relationship: Slicing an Apple | The Economist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
16,548 posts, read 19,698,509 times
Reputation: 13331
Quote:
Originally Posted by yowps3 View Post

I hope they take comfort in knowing that after their obnoxious corporate behavior not much people will be interested in the upcoming iPhone
Seriously? No one cares about this except Sammy and Apple.

Some of the patents that Apple claims were infringed are pretty weak. Like "Square icons with rounded edges" Seriously?
Patenet Law needs to be updated for the modern age...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
4,472 posts, read 17,699,609 times
Reputation: 4095
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdm2008 View Post
Really? Perhaps you should learn to keep before you stick your nose up in the air.
Apple and Samsung's symbiotic relationship: Slicing an Apple | The Economist
I was wrong, good God. Talk about sticking my nose up in the air...especially when the previous poster pointed the same thing out? Seems like the pot is calling the kettle black.

Regardless, the verdict isn't going to influence consumers to purchase one over the other. And I'm still convinced Apple's iPhone 5 is going to sell like hotcakes when released.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 10:03 AM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,671,195 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedyAZ View Post
I was wrong, good God. Talk about sticking my nose up in the air...especially when the previous poster pointed the same thing out? Seems like the pot is calling the kettle black.

Regardless, the verdict isn't going to influence consumers to purchase one over the other. And I'm still convinced Apple's iPhone 5 is going to sell like hotcakes when released.
Hey. Perhaps keep your insults to yourself until you know what you are talking about and people will simply politely point out you are incorrect. It's not the same thing, because what I posted is factually correct and you posted is not. That's the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
4,472 posts, read 17,699,609 times
Reputation: 4095
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdm2008 View Post
Hey. Perhaps keep your insults to yourself until you know what you are talking about and people will simply politely point out you are incorrect. It's not the same thing, because what I posted is factually correct and you posted is not. That's the difference.
Someone already pointed out that something I was not aware of, you simply restated the information except with a snotty comment attached.

If you think I insulted anyone, you're one of the thinnest-skinned people I've ever come across.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2012, 04:10 PM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,671,195 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedyAZ View Post
Someone already pointed out that something I was not aware of, you simply restated the information except with a snotty comment attached.

If you think I insulted anyone, you're one of the thinnest-skinned people I've ever come across.
Thats correct. I restated the information with a snotty comment attached because your obnoxious ignorant post deserved it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top