Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2011, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Rock Hill
1,218 posts, read 2,990,071 times
Reputation: 391

Advertisements

Any reason for the constant traffic on I-77 north after exit 4 in the afternoon? Ill go through there at 3pm and have bumper to bumper traffic. I can understand traffic at rush hour, but, at 3pm? Has this always been like this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-05-2011, 12:18 AM
 
5,150 posts, read 7,762,588 times
Reputation: 1443
I-77 sold its soul to the devil several years back.

Last edited by GCharlotte; 02-05-2011 at 12:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 04:13 AM
 
1,826 posts, read 2,494,871 times
Reputation: 1811
I-77 needs to be widened pretty badly. 85 is eight lanes all the way through Mecklenburg County and is only really congested at Concord Mills in the afternoon.

I went to SC and noticed that 77 is eight lanes from the border all the way through Rock Hill but contracts to six through Uptown Charlotte (its busiest part). NC needs to get on the ball.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
7,041 posts, read 15,036,775 times
Reputation: 2335
psst...77 doesn't GO to Concord Mills....(that would be 85 north)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Mooresville, NC
1,619 posts, read 3,872,762 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagocubs View Post
psst...77 doesn't GO to Concord Mills....(that would be 85 north)
psst....who said that 77 goes to Concord Mills?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Rock Hill
1,218 posts, read 2,990,071 times
Reputation: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagocubs View Post
psst...77 doesn't GO to Concord Mills....(that would be 85 north)
The poster was saying 77 needed to take 85's example and widen the highway, and the only flaw is the bottleneck at the Concord Mills exit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 01:44 PM
 
3,071 posts, read 9,138,312 times
Reputation: 1660
This is normal. It is caused by all of the day workers who live outside of charlotte trying to get a head start home on the traffic that gets worse later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Fort Mill, SC
2,532 posts, read 3,451,326 times
Reputation: 1366
Plus being Friday everyone seems to leave work early.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 07:31 PM
 
1,826 posts, read 2,494,871 times
Reputation: 1811
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagocubs View Post
psst...77 doesn't GO to Concord Mills....(that would be 85 north)
I was saying that since 85 is eight lanes, its only major bottleneck is Concord Mills in the afternoon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 07:08 AM
 
1,661 posts, read 3,288,138 times
Reputation: 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaysofThundr46 View Post
Any reason for the constant traffic on I-77 north after exit 4 in the afternoon? Ill go through there at 3pm and have bumper to bumper traffic. I can understand traffic at rush hour, but, at 3pm? Has this always been like this?
Yes, for a long time. The simple answer is the road is carrying more traffic than it was designed for. The part of I-77 from Nations Ford to uptown Charlotte was originally built as a 4 lane divided highway with a grass medium between the sets of lanes. As Charlotte boomed in the 70s and 80s the road became very congested and the NCDOT solution to the problem was to add an additional lane in each direction by paving over the grassy medium. This is the road we have today.

The problem with adding additional lanes now is that it will require the purchase of what has become very expensive property on both sides of the road, and almost every bridge over the highway will have to be torn down and rebuilt to handle the extra lane. The NCDOT simply doesn't have the money to do this so it's not likely to be fixed in the forseeable future. The situation is further complicated politically because part of the justification of the NCDOT paying for 25% of Lynx, was that it would take traffic off I-77.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top