Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-10-2011, 10:55 AM
 
841 posts, read 1,432,419 times
Reputation: 454

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
They are marching in washington too... Wall St. and Congress are in bed together. I have no problem if people march on both.

I have this strange feeling if the march started in Washington you would tell them to go to the reserve or wall st. In my honest opinion I think you aren't a fan of those who are protesting so it really doesn't matter where they go...
I have a strange feeling you don't know me very well.

I also think you believe the protestors can not be wrong at all.

We are going to agree to disagree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-10-2011, 11:01 AM
 
Location: State of Being
35,879 posts, read 77,483,478 times
Reputation: 22752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus View Post
well, brian, here's the problem that puzzles me:

the people who say, "It's not Wall Street's fault", don't seem to have any interest in these at-fault entities (Congress, the President, or anyone they vote for) actually regulating Wall Street.
Respectfully, Cletus, perhaps you missed my posts where I clearly stated, several times, that the problem is with regs and legislation and in Congress and the White House . . .

Folks do what they do b/c they are legally able to do it. So go to the governance source: legislators.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,515,926 times
Reputation: 3899
Disgusting......absolutely disgusting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 11:40 AM
 
841 posts, read 1,432,419 times
Reputation: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
Disgusting......absolutely disgusting.
I'd be curious to know exactly why you believe so. Not being argumentative. I genuinely want to know the answer since there are a lot of different directions one could go with that point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Lake Norman area
763 posts, read 822,171 times
Reputation: 337
Banking executives study hard all their loves, go to college and spend big bucks to obtain their MBAs. Then they start out as apprentices making peanuts. Then they work 80 hours a week in various intern programs for their institutions. Finally, they have very stressful lives, still working 60-80 hours a week, can only take 'working' vacations, and push employees to work hard and produce as they are the main source of their sometimes exhuberabt salaries. High ranking bank executives get $5-$7million annually.

Football players generally do poorly in high school. Get a scholarship only because they can play football well, have no asperations except to play ball. Have lives void of real stresses or pressure. Better players get up to $10 million annually. Some get $1 million per game. Some coaches get $5-$7 million annually.

Funny that people aren't out protesting football salaries and $100 plus tickets. Funny how people have set their priorities. They use their blind prejudices to set them. I would say that the banking executive performs the valuable service regardless of the salary he/she has negotiated for and receives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,515,926 times
Reputation: 3899
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowercountry View Post
I'd be curious to know exactly why you believe so. Not being argumentative. I genuinely want to know the answer since there are a lot of different directions one could go with that point.

For people who do and create nothing it is ridiculous. This bank is being propped up under the guise of buffett with tax payer money soon to follow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 12:00 PM
 
841 posts, read 1,432,419 times
Reputation: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
For people who do and create nothing it is ridiculous. This bank is being propped up under the guise of buffett with tax payer money soon to follow.

Banks are hardly guilty of "creating nothing." In fact, they help fund creation via loans, though admittedly lately they've been fearful of losing again. The irony is they are afraid to take risks now but some are complaining that they won't take the risks. Then if they take the risk and it's bad, everyone will complain that they were poorly run and failing, damaging the economy.

I disagree about tax payer money "soon to follow" but if it is I suspect it'll be just like TARP - repaid with interest. As much as I hated TARP it has turned out to be a loan and not a bail out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,515,926 times
Reputation: 3899
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowercountry View Post
Banks are hardly guilty of "creating nothing." In fact, they help fund creation via loans, though admittedly lately they've been fearful of losing again. The irony is they are afraid to take risks now but some are complaining that they won't take the risks. Then if they take the risk and it's bad, everyone will complain that they were poorly run and failing, damaging the economy.

I disagree about tax payer money "soon to follow" but if it is I suspect it'll be just like TARP - repaid with interest. As much as I hated TARP it has turned out to be a loan and not a bail out.
Banks create nothing, they provide a service. Now they are going to start ripping off consumers all the while padding the executives pockets.

Here is some reading material for you, the banks are just plain self serving and have become disgusting.

UPDATE 3-U.S. banks told they need to start lending again | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 12:18 PM
 
841 posts, read 1,432,419 times
Reputation: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
Banks create nothing, they provide a service. Now they are going to start ripping off consumers all the while padding the executives pockets.

Here is some reading material for you, the banks are just plain self serving and have become disgusting.

UPDATE 3-U.S. banks told they need to start lending again | Reuters

So we don't NEED any industry that doesn't create a tangible product? Interesting.

As far as ripping off customers? Vote with your feet... and your money. Change to a different bank or credit union. In the free market someone will take your business.

On the last point? I get a tad concerned when a federal entity begins pushing loans. While I agree to a point, the last time the feds got heavily involved in pushing loans we had the Fanny/Freddie meltdown that helped lead to the house bubble bursting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2011, 12:50 PM
 
2,668 posts, read 7,157,676 times
Reputation: 3570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stella Artois View Post
Banking executives study hard all their loves, go to college and spend big bucks to obtain their MBAs. Then they start out as apprentices making peanuts. Then they work 80 hours a week in various intern programs for their institutions. Finally, they have very stressful lives, still working 60-80 hours a week, can only take 'working' vacations, and push employees to work hard and produce as they are the main source of their sometimes exhuberabt salaries. High ranking bank executives get $5-$7million annually.
Hahahaha...I have to admit this is hilarious. Having worked a number of years in the banking industry, I can assure you there is no way those folks "earn" such exorbitant salaries. Many are borderline incompetent, and got where they are by being nothing more than Yes-men (and women). But I agree with lowcountry--we shouldn't blame the execs for taking all they're given. Blame the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top