Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, and GMC
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2009, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,764,742 times
Reputation: 39453

Advertisements

If the new base Camaro (not SS) is 300 horsepower, why is it slower (6.0 0-60) than the 275 Horsepower 1995 Z-28? (5.7 0-60). I do not think that the new one is significantly heavier. Emissions control should be about the same. Just curious. I am sure that someone on here knows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2009, 05:16 PM
 
Location: WI
3,961 posts, read 11,016,490 times
Reputation: 2503
not comparing stats, the new one is a v6, old one v8. As torque gets ya rolling; i'd put it there for some of the difference. Plus probably higher gears for mpg's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2009, 06:57 PM
 
8,777 posts, read 19,852,893 times
Reputation: 5291
The '10 Camaro is at least 400 pounds heavier than the '93-'02. Also, i'm sure gearing on the '10 V6 will be less aggressive than the gearing was on the '95 V8 performance model.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2009, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Fly-over country.
1,763 posts, read 7,332,123 times
Reputation: 922
don't you think driver ability and conditions such as the environment, the surface, etc make .3 of a second a non issue here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2009, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,138,905 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldjensens View Post
If the new base Camaro (not SS) is 300 horsepower, why is it slower (6.0 0-60) than the 275 Horsepower 1995 Z-28? (5.7 0-60). I do not think that the new one is significantly heavier. Emissions control should be about the same. Just curious. I am sure that someone on here knows.
To get your answer, look at the differences between the two cars in the following specs:

1) torque
2) weight

Despite your suspicions, the difference in weight is pretty substantial, to the tune of about 400 lbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2009, 08:52 PM
 
3,743 posts, read 13,697,007 times
Reputation: 2787
Where are you getting your numbers from? .3 sec is basically identical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2009, 08:07 PM
 
151 posts, read 525,426 times
Reputation: 139
0-60 is not the best way to make conclusions about their power, since their traction off the line is crucial for such a short run. 1/4 mile times and speeds would be much better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2009, 04:20 AM
 
Location: Cold Frozen North
1,928 posts, read 5,164,677 times
Reputation: 1307
Anyone know yet when the new Camaro will hit the showroom floor? I heard this month, but I'm skeptical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2009, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Fly-over country.
1,763 posts, read 7,332,123 times
Reputation: 922
Head out to a car show if there's one near you. I was told GM has several of them making the rounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2009, 07:04 AM
 
Location: WI
3,961 posts, read 11,016,490 times
Reputation: 2503
i'd be leary of buying from the first round of cars coming thru. I'm pretty excited about this generation of Camaro; but I may wait a bit to make sure any bugs are worked out before I go look at one. No disrespect meant to any line worker, but with all the black couds hanging over their shoulders in the auto biz, one would wonder how focused they can be on doing the best job possible in a build process ( so please don't take this wrong; I know there is a lot of pride in what they do and seeing Janesville WI plant get closed up you can see how hard it is for workers and their communities ).
It's human nature; many of us on this forum are either dealing with a job issue or know ones who have in this economy; and it is very difficult to put your best foot forward not knowing what tomorrow may bring.
I do hope the Camaro hits the floor soon and initial reviews are strong for it. That car won't save Chevy, but should draw interest back to the sales floors which for once would be a positive for them.
I also wonder if the roll out will be limited at first--Chevy may not send these to dealers who may not make the cut if they go thru bankrupcy, though hopefully that's not the case.
just my .02
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, and GMC
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top