Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago Suburbs
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2013, 02:15 PM
 
11,975 posts, read 31,776,941 times
Reputation: 4644

Advertisements

The BNSF is faster train service. I'm not sure why. I live on the Union Pacific West, and my morning express train would stop only stop at Elmhurst and then Ogilvie, and for some reason it just always seems to get stalled in that huge switching yard in Berkely or the other one on the West Side of Chicago.

However, Ogilvie is convenient to a lot more offices than Union Station (the UP-W goes in to Ogilvie, and the BNSF goes in to Union Station). If you use the suburban concourse to exit the station at Ogilvie, you are already as far north as Washington or Randolph. It really depends on where your office is downtown. I worked on the north side of the Loop, so I could make up the train difference with a shorter walk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2013, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Chicago
3,339 posts, read 5,985,828 times
Reputation: 4242
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lookout Kid View Post
The BNSF is faster train service. I'm not sure why. I live on the Union Pacific West, and my morning express train would stop only stop at Elmhurst and then Ogilvie, and for some reason it just always seems to get stalled in that huge switching yard in Berkely or the other one on the West Side of Chicago.

However, Ogilvie is convenient to a lot more offices than Union Station (the UP-W goes in to Ogilvie, and the BNSF goes in to Union Station). If you use the suburban concourse to exit the station at Ogilvie, you are already as far north as Washington or Randolph. It really depends on where your office is downtown. I worked on the north side of the Loop, so I could make up the train difference with a shorter walk.
I agree with everything Lookout Kid said. I think whether La Grange or Elmhurst is more convenient depends on exactly where your office is downtown (assuming it even is downtown) and where you travel to in the region regularly. I go north much more often than south because of where my friends and family are, so Elmhurst is more convenient for me. Ogilvie is also more convenient to my office than Union. If you end up going to the south suburbs more often and your work is closer to Union Station, then La Grange may be the way to go.

When we were looking for our house (we moved in April) I considered La Grange as well as Elmhurst in addition to about 10 other towns. Ultimately, we found the right house in Elmhurst. I really like living there though, if that means anything to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 03:08 PM
 
768 posts, read 1,102,864 times
Reputation: 370
Monroe/Wacker - so I think either works fine?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2013, 12:38 PM
 
11,975 posts, read 31,776,941 times
Reputation: 4644
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJski View Post
Monroe/Wacker - so I think either works fine?
Yeah, that's basically an ideal commuting location for most Metra lines. You are almost exactly between the two largest stations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2013, 08:18 PM
 
4 posts, read 4,148 times
Reputation: 10
Google is telling me it's a 40 min ride on the Elmhurst train to downtown. Is that a low estimate? How consistent is it?

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2013, 08:34 PM
 
Location: Chicago
3,339 posts, read 5,985,828 times
Reputation: 4242
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmergentX View Post
Google is telling me it's a 40 min ride on the Elmhurst train to downtown. Is that a low estimate? How consistent is it?

Thanks in advance!
The train is pretty consistent, but it depends on whether you take an express train or not. You can get from Elmhurst to Chicago in as little as 27 minutes, or it can take as long as 36 minutes if the train makes every stop. The only reason it would take longer than that is if there's some sort of delay, which luckily, delays of more than a couple minutes are pretty rare.

Union Pacific / West (UP-W) Schedule
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago Suburbs
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top