Will Chicago possibly become more populated then Los Angeles (new construction, private school)

[moneylova]

Since it's a lot cheaper to live and is more attractive. And forgive me for not putting "than" instead of "then".

[ccjarider]

No- too cold for most Mexicans.

[Alacran]

Not in the near future.

And nothing to do with Mexicans.

[DADASGIRL]

The city limits - at least the desireable parts - will keep its steady population, but its the "chicago-land area" that will see the most growth. Nearby burbs did their fare share of "building like there was no tomorrow". Tons of new subdivisions give potential residents more than enough to choose from. There's something for everyone - in ALL price ranges outside the city. Being actually in the city may present its problems for many wanting a suburban setting in the city. Public schools arent that great and if you factor in private school costs into the overall cost of living that may be too much for some family budgets.

Sure the cost of living here is cheaper than NY or L.A. - but what a person saves on housing may be eaten up by Chicago taxes.

Not sure if your question is rudely geared towards a Hispanic influx - but Chicago's Latino population rivals that of any big city - and will continue to be so. Depending on income - Latinos will flock to areas in and around the city. Thats the way it is EVERYWHERE.

[Visvaldis]

All residential buildings within the city limits should be at least 10 floors.

[hxcobd]

More populated? that is years, if not decades away.

But as long as Chicago is more affordable than NYC and LA, yes, it will see growth.

[Irishtom29]

After the collapse of American society Chicago's position on a prime intracontinental trade route will stand it in good stead. Not to mention Chicago's proximity to timber, fertile farmlands and abundant water; always good things to have around, especially after a societal collapse.

San Francisco with it's natural harbor will once again become the largest west coast city when the artificial harbors of Los Angeles deteriorate along with that city's ability to exist on water taken from other places. LA is a kind of artificial city; there's not much done there that HAS to be done there unlike the case with cities on natural trade routes, cities with natural harbors and cities near abundant resources.

[Tex?Il?]

Originally Posted by moneylova

Since it's a lot cheaper to live and is more attractive. And forgive me for not putting "than" instead of "then".

Matter of opinion. Chicago may have a more attractive core/downtown/lakefront. But I will dare to say that Chicagos west and south side ghettos are physically much more depressing and run-down looking than LAs bad areas. Though they may be equally as dangerous.

No, Chicago will not pass up LA. If cheap is all someone is looking for, they will look to many other cities other than Chicago.

[Tex?Il?]

Originally Posted by Visvaldis

All residential buildings within the city limits should be at least 10 floors.

??? And tear down perfectly good existing housing?? Or are you talking about new construction?

[Avengerfire]

What is with all of these population speculations lately?