Outside Magazine's Best Towns 2013

[chet everett]

Originally Posted by nearnorth

Quite possibly the truest words ever spoken on this forum.

If I were to condense all the helpfulness you've added to these boards I might say that you've loaded a toilet but that would insult Sir Crapper's invention....

Strangely the same could be said for the low quality of the Outside article that is the topic of this thread -- no doubt the same low standards are what means that even on tablet such a completely valueless article would do one less good than a paper magazine, as the latter could at least be used productively should one find themselve using a commode...

[Lookout Kid]

Originally Posted by chet everett

Strangely the same could be said for the low quality of the Outside article that is the topic of this thread -- no doubt the same low standards are what means that even on tablet such a completely valueless article would do one less good than a paper magazine, as the latter could at least be used productively should one find themselve using a commode...

I find it hard to believe that a poorly researched article in a fluff magazine that no one reads could illicit such an emotional response from anyone. Who cares? Someone wrote that Chicago was great for outdoor activities. Cool. The article was bad. Boo. Move on.

[Plzeň]

Originally Posted by Lookout Kid

I find it hard to believe that a poorly researched article in a fluff magazine that no one reads could illicit such an emotional response from anyone.

We all do, LK. We all do.