Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-23-2014, 03:09 PM
 
1,089 posts, read 1,861,166 times
Reputation: 1156

Advertisements

I see some development coming along. I expect it will get gentrified over time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2014, 02:21 AM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,913,630 times
Reputation: 8743
The policies followed in Uptown are an object lesson in how to turn a great city into another Detroit. Chicago's north side has been so economically vibrant that Uptown has not been completely destroyed and is showing signs of a revival, but one should never underestimate what bad policy can do over a prolonged period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2014, 06:29 AM
 
4,006 posts, read 6,036,023 times
Reputation: 3897
Wow....just wow. I'm flummoxed! I can't disagree with what anyone has contributed to this topic. Everyone is spot on with their comments and assessment of Shiller.
This is difficult for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2014, 06:44 AM
 
Location: Uptown
1,520 posts, read 2,573,940 times
Reputation: 1236
shiller was garbage BUT the neighborhood got better and saw greater percentage drops in violent crime under shiller than it has under cappleman...who is also awful, just a different variety.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2014, 07:04 AM
 
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
4,619 posts, read 8,165,755 times
Reputation: 6321
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightlysparrow View Post
Well, the FedGov under HUD gave massive grants and loans to both individual homeowners (who did renovations), landlords (who did few renovations) and the City to clean up Uptown way back in the late 1960's. They did get the college built, but the rest of the money went??? Many blocks look exactly the same 50 years later; it's eerie.
Yep, and it doesn't look like Englewood or Garfield Park or North Lawndale, so sometimes stasis isn't so bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2014, 07:58 AM
 
28,455 posts, read 85,332,804 times
Reputation: 18728
Default In Chicago ?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nightlysparrow View Post
Well, the FedGov under HUD gave massive grants and loans to both individual homeowners (who did renovations), landlords (who did few renovations) and the City to clean up Uptown way back in the late 1960's. They did get the college built, but the rest of the money went??? Many blocks look exactly the same 50 years later; it's eerie.
Are you suggesting that corruption and misguided do-gooders that aligned themselves with self interested polticians actually held back progress for decades? Why we've never seen that before...

Certainly no one that has learned the lessons of how destructive these things are to real efforts at economic progress would do other that reject efforts to allow poltical forces to stand in the way of real improvements...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2014, 08:09 AM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,182,626 times
Reputation: 11355
The neighborhood certainly HAS gotten better. Everything south of Montrose is basically gentrified and great, although that's obviously not the area people think of when they think "Uptown".

I think the new alderman has been pretty good, at least he's very active and trying hard to improve the neighborhood while at the same time involving the community input much more than some other wards.

Closing down the large Somerset Nursing Home which was more a massive pit of crime and mistreatment than a nursing home helped a lot, as well as the new Target, the increase in businesses in the area, the revamping of Broadway, quite a few new condos and apartments actually went up during the 2000's. Salvation Army that had a lot of issues is closed, FLATS is building out dozens of apartments geared towards people in their 20's with a healthy income. Lawrence House is the new controversy, as the very notorious building is being completely revamped into a few hundred new apartments for $14M that will rent for up to $3,000 a month. At a loss are the building mostly impoverished residents who are on fixed incomes. Unfortunately the building has housed and is the center of a lot of crime in the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2014, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Uptown
1,520 posts, read 2,573,940 times
Reputation: 1236
by far the best part of uptown and one of the largest sections is the area north of lawrence and west of broadway...much nicer than Buena Park IMO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2014, 08:44 AM
 
11,975 posts, read 31,776,941 times
Reputation: 4644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleking View Post
by far the best part of uptown and one of the largest sections is the area north of lawrence and west of broadway...much nicer than Buena Park IMO
It's basically an extension of Andersonville! I think Clark has some potential to be awesome south of Lawrence and north of Montrose. There are some really great storefronts there, but many are abandoned or have marginal uses now. But it can draw from Ravenswood and Sheridan Park, so there's definitely potential there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2014, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Uptown
1,520 posts, read 2,573,940 times
Reputation: 1236
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
^ Yep (and Buena Park is perfectly fine) while it probably won't see full scale gentrification fast, it will see a little. There's a new, nice 15 story apartment/condo high rise just completed on its southern edge, a new-ish building near the Sheridan stop, a proposal across the street from it and next to the Sheridan stop. New-ish Target near the Wilson stop, and the Wilson stop was OK'd for a large $200+ million rehab. If the entertainment center near the Lawrence stop took off and got funding, you'd probably see more gentrification. I think FLATS has a handful of properties in the area too.

FLATS doesn't have a single tenant in Uptown despite taking over something like half a dozen large properties...they smell like the same type of scam artists that were all over Uptown from 2000-2006.

I just wish we had an alderman that could succesfully steer some dense market rate developments to the numerous underused/surface lots surrounding the Lawrence/Wilson stops...instead we got another drive thru fast food joint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top