Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-14-2019, 11:44 AM
 
19 posts, read 7,180 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

Copy and pasted from FB page

Here’s a tip Harry Osterman, when pretending you’re against the Lincoln Yard TIF try not to compare it to Schaumburg. Schaumburg is a cheaper place to live than Chicago. Clearly you haven’t traveled outside of Chicago much? This is why people think midwesterners are ignorant.

“This is super-sized. This is Schaumburg Yards — not Lincoln Yards,” Osterman said.
“This is the rich getting richer. This is the North Side getting norther.”

https://www.facebook.com/40479267293...582650?sfns=mo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2019, 11:26 PM
 
Location: ✶✶✶✶
15,216 posts, read 30,545,629 times
Reputation: 10851
As a non-Illinoisian (well, for the time being) and a photographer, I assumed "TIF" probably wasn't a type of digital photo file and is some sort of tax deal. And, well, looks like I was right.

If this project really did create 24,000 jobs, it seems like a pretty good deal compared to the packages Amazon has been getting offered for their "HQ2" that I'm not convinced will ever exist at this point, plus ostensibly more of the money would stay in Chicago. Also, increasing values expand the tax base in an older industrial area that isn't as productive as it used to be, therefore offsetting at least some of the cost.

I've lived in Dayton and Detroit, where a lot of this stuff is sitting around empty or underused and being nonproductive. That's not doing anybody any good, and it's pretty clear by now that the MAGA promises aren't going to scrape the rust off the belt. Time to try something else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2019, 07:33 AM
 
Location: IL
529 posts, read 646,818 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoldAndrew78 View Post
Copy and pasted from FB page

Here’s a tip Harry Osterman, when pretending you’re against the Lincoln Yard TIF try not to compare it to Schaumburg. Schaumburg is a cheaper place to live than Chicago. Clearly you haven’t traveled outside of Chicago much? This is why people think midwesterners are ignorant.

“This is super-sized. This is Schaumburg Yards — not Lincoln Yards,” Osterman said.
“This is the rich getting richer. This is the North Side getting norther.”

https://www.facebook.com/40479267293...582650?sfns=mo
I mean if this place gets built and you asked me what the most similar Chicago area most similar to Schaumburg, I'd say Lincoln Yards, don't @ me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top